Skip to content
Ahepa Affordable Housing Management Company Inc at a glance

· Public charity

Ahepa Affordable Housing Management Company Inc

To facilitate the development, construction, management, and operation of affordable housing facilities for low-income elderly and handicapped persons.

$530k
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$68k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$756kPhilanthropy$711kEducation$138kHuman Services$50kReligion$49kHealth$44kArts & Culture$42kRecreation & Sports$20k
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 36 grants below total $501,373, the rows itemized in this filing. The $529,813 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $28,440 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $116k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $318k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $68k
$10,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILLIAM G HELIS CHAPTER 310 ORDER OF AHEPA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$67,711
AHEPA 78 CHARITIES INC$32,976
KULTURECITY$30,000
DAUGHTERS OF PENELOPE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC$28,000
AHEPA 29 CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC$27,590
NATIONAL HELLENIC SOCIETY$25,000
AHEPA COLUMBIA FOUNDATION INC$20,655
HELLAS NATIONAL SOFTBALL TEAM$20,000
AHEPA 232 FOUNDATION INC$18,906
AHEPA 501 FOUNDATION INC$16,488
AHEPA 192 CHARITABLE TRUST$15,719
AHEPA NORWICH FOUNDATION INC$15,169
AHEPA ONE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$13,340
PENELOPE 54 CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$12,311
AHEPA ROCHESTER FOUNDATION$10,992
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KULTURECITY: $30k → 16%CINCINNATI AHEPA PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $11k → 16%CINCINNATI AHEPA PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $11k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
NM
NC
SC
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 31 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
2

Total granted

$1.7M
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+3%
+373%

Still filing today

35%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $109k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’23’24
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    PENELOPE HOUSE INC
    2× · 2020–2023 · $50k · revenue +3%
  • CA
    CINCINNATI AHEPA PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $22k · revenue +214% · 100% of their budget
  • AH
    AHEPA HAVERHILL FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $12k · revenue +129% · 99% of their budget

Funded once

  • OV
    ORTHODOX VOLUNTEER CORPSgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $24k · revenue +373%
  • HI
    HEALTH IMPERATIVES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $14k · revenue +67%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ahepa Hippocratic Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
2
Ahepa Family Charities Foundation Inc
Education
3
Alpha Phi Alpha Foundation of Akron
—
4
National Hellenic Invitational Basketball Tournament Inc
Recreation & Sports
5
Omicron Lambda Chapter Alpha Phi Alpha Education Foundation
—
6
Order of Ahepa

To promote the ancient Hellenic ideals of education philanthropy civic responsibility family and individual excellence through community service and volunteerism.

—
7
Ph Foundation
Philanthropy
8
The Athena Foundation
Philanthropy
9
AHUS Foundation Inc
Health
10
Ochino Foundation
—
11
Hellenic Hearts

Provide academic scholarships and community assistance

Education
12
Halpern Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cincinnati Ahepa Philanthropic Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Whiteman 4G Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AHEPA NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION: $708,737 · Housing & ShelterAHEPA NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATIONAHEPA CHAPTER NO 78 CHARITIES INC: $88,340 · OtherAHEPA CHAPTER NO 78 CHARITIES INCDAUGHTERS OF PENELOPE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $56,000 · OtherDAUGHTERS OF PENELOPE CHARITABLE FOUNDA…AHEPA COLUMBIA FOUNDATION INC: $55,350 · OtherAHEPA COLUMBIA FOUNDATION INCAHEPA 29 CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $46,321 · OtherAHEPA 29 CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONAHEPA 501 FOUNDATION INC: $44,170 · OtherAHEPA 501 FOUNDATION INCAHEPA 192 CHARITABLE TR: $42,110 · OtherAHEPA 192 CHARITABLE TRAHEPA NORWICH FOUNDATION INC: $40,637 · OtherAHEPA NORWICH FOUNDATION INCAHEPA 232 FOUNDATION: $37,812 · OtherAHEPA 232 FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM: $35,828 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAMPENELOPE 54 CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $32,980 · OtherNATIONAL HELLENIC SOCIETY: $25,000 · OtherAHEPA NEWPORT FOUNDATION INC: $24,145 · Other+8 more: $101,276 · Other+8 moreWILLIAM G HELIS CHAPTER 310 ORDER OF AHEPA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $181,392 · PhilanthropyWILLIAM G HELIS CH…ORTHODOX VOLUNTEER CORPS: $24,000 · PhilanthropyORTHODOX VOLUNTEER…AHEPA 302 Charitable Foundation: $19,786 · PhilanthropyAHEPA 302 Charitab…AHEPA 113 Charitable Fund: $12,750 · PhilanthropyAHEPA ROCHESTER FOUNDATION: $10,992 · PhilanthropyAHEPA CHAPTER NO 60 CHARITIES INC: $10,552 · PhilanthropyDAUGHTERS CHAPTER 120 CHARITY INC: $10,552 · PhilanthropyAHEPA GREENVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $10,552 · PhilanthropyWhiteman 4G Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropyPENELOPE HOUSE INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesKultureCity: $30,000 · Human ServicesCINCINNATI AHEPA PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION INC: $21,544 · Human ServicesPENELOPE 38 CHARITABLE TR: $11,652 · EducationAHEPA 408 PHILANTHROPIES INC: $10,992 · EducationAHEPA SYRACUSE FOUNDATION INC: $10,992 · EducationHELLAS NATIONAL SOFTBALL TEAM: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsHEALTH IMPERATIVES INC: $14,200 · HealthAHEPA HAVERHILL FOUNDATION INC: $11,870 · Arts & Culture
Housing & Shelter$708,737Other$629,969Philanthropy$290,576Human Services$101,544Education$33,636Recreation & Sports$20,000Health$14,200Arts & Culture$11,870

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWILLIAM G HELIS CHAPTER 310 ORDER OF AHEPA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $181,392 over 3y, 94% of budgetPENELOPE HOUSE INC: $50,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetKultureCity: $30,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetORTHODOX VOLUNTEER CORPS: $24,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetCINCINNATI AHEPA PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION INC: $21,544 over 2y, 100% of budgetHELLAS NATIONAL SOFTBALL TEAM: $20,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetHEALTH IMPERATIVES INC: $14,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAHEPA 113 Charitable Fund: $12,750 over 2y, 99% of budgetAHEPA HAVERHILL FOUNDATION INC: $11,870 over 2y, 99% of budgetPENELOPE 38 CHARITABLE TR: $11,652 over 2y, 100% of budgetAHEPA SYRACUSE FOUNDATION INC: $10,992 over 2y, 100% of budgetAHEPA CHAPTER NO 60 CHARITIES INC: $10,552 over 2y, 100% of budgetWhiteman 4G Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AHEPA NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAM G HELIS CHAPTER 310 ORDER OF AHEPA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PENELOPE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds KultureCity ↗
  • Who funds ORTHODOX VOLUNTEER CORPS ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI AHEPA PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HELLAS NATIONAL SOFTBALL TEAM ↗
  • Who funds AHEPA 302 Charitable Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH IMPERATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds AHEPA 113 Charitable Fund ↗
  • Who funds AHEPA HAVERHILL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PENELOPE 38 CHARITABLE TR ↗
  • Who funds AHEPA 408 PHILANTHROPIES INC ↗
  • Who funds AHEPA ROCHESTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AHEPA SYRACUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AHEPA CHAPTER NO 60 CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds AHEPA GREENVILLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Whiteman 4G Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments …
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA1.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ahepa Affordable Housing Management Company Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ahepa Affordable Housing Management Company Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 79%
  • Health Imperatives Inc: 79% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ahepa Affordable Housing Management Company’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home