· Private foundation
Aging in America
TO PROVIDE INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND CAREGIVERS, THE SUPPORT AND ASSISTANCE THEY NEED TO LIVE, WORK AND REMAIN A VITAL PART OF THEIR COMMUNITIES.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $6k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MCCLOSKEY WORKS CULINARY SKILLS PROGRAM | $100,000 |
| PACE UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER | $50,000 |
| WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES | $35,000 |
| HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| WARTBURG HOME FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| LEADING AGE DC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $103k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against -2% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $165k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCOMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC4× · 2019–2024 · $110k · revenue +269%
- PUPACE UNIVERSITY2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +5%
- HAHEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC5× · 2020–2024 · $75k · revenue +83%
Funded once
- NCNATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +45%
- IAINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOMES AND SERVICES FOR THE AGINGone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue -18% · 40% of their budget
- DCDIALYSIS CLINIC INCone grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Leadingage new york represents not-for-profit, mission-driven and public continuing care providers, including nursing homes, senior housing, adult care facilities, continuing care retirement communities, assisted living and community…
Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.
Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…
Driven by excellence, our caring professionals respect the dignity and diversity of individuals and families. through innovative programming, the agency responds to the evolving needs of the westchester community. the agency helps people…
Wesley community services, inc. is focused on providing services to older adults and those of low income. it was established in 2005 as a faith-based non-profit organization dedicated to providing services to people of all faiths in a…
Chatham place at mary wade (dba) is an 84 unit assisted living and memory care facility which provides high quality services which seek to maximize residents dignity and vitality.
Guided by christian compassion, wesleylife supports the independence, health, and well-being of older adults wherever they call home. as a non-profit organization, we understand our responsibility and obligation to operate with…
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
Lawrence home care of westchester promotes health; health for individuals, families and the community; prevents disease by teaching the principles of health, hygiene and sanitation and provides skilled nursing care for the sick in their…
Vna of hudson valley was formed to provide home health care to the people of westchester county. services include nursing; physical, occupational and speech therapy; medical social services; and home health aides. our mission is to provide…
To promote and enhance the quality and accessibility of health care and support at home.
Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Home for Aged Hebrews and the most unlike its peers is Collaborative for Palliative Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds PACE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CHURCH RESIDENCES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOMES AND SERVICES FOR THE AGING ↗
- Who funds CARDINAL MCCLOSKEY SCHOOL AND HOME FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR LONG TERM CARE INC ↗
- Who funds WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LEADINGAGE INC ↗
- Who funds DIALYSIS CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds COLLABORATIVE FOR PALLIATIVE CARE ↗
- Who funds VISITING NURSE SERVICES IN WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds VNSW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LIFTING UP WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE WARTBURG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED HOME FOR AGED HEBREWS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pcsb Community Foundation · Field Hall Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Aging in America funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Aging in America?
Find your warmest path to Aging in America through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.