Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Agb Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Environment$431kHealth$95kArts & Culture$94kFood & Nutrition$66kHuman Services$37kPhilanthropy$30kHousing & Shelter$25kCommunity Improvement$10k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIVERKEEPER INC$25,000
HISTORIC HUDSON VALLEY$25,000
SCENIC HUDSON INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC: $15k → 17%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $12k → 9%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $10k → 9%OSSINING FOOD PANTRY: $10k → 9%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $10k → 9%OSSINING FOOD PANTRY: $10k → 9%OSSINING FOOD PANTRY: $6k → 9%OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$659k · 8 repeat orgs$129k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$659k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
0%

Still filing today

88%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEnvironmentPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    RIVERKEEPER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $366k · revenue +31%
  • HH
    HISTORIC HUDSON VALLEY
    3× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +28%
  • TL
    TEATOWN LAKE RESERVATION INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $55k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • OD
    OPEN DOOR FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $55k · revenue 0%
  • TB
    THE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -43%
  • OD
    OPEN DOOR FAMILY HEALTH CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Westchester Land Trust Inc

The primary mission of the Westchester Land Trust is to conserve, maintain and enhance the natural environment and resources of Westchester County and eastern Putnam County. The Trust acquires interests in land exhibiting important natural…

Environment
2
Northern Westchester Hospital Association

Northern westchester hospital association is an affiliate within northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care;…

Health
3
Hudson Highlands Fjord Trail Inc

To create and steward a 7.5-mile linear park along the Hudson River that solves existing safety concerns around visitation, provides welcoming access to people of all abilities, restores and protects natural resources, and enhances quality…

Environment
4
Dutchess Land Conservancy Inc

Dutchess land conservancy (dlc) is dedicated to preserving the scenic, agricultural and environmental resources of dutchess county, new york, and the surrounding area. dlc, as a private non-profit land conservation organization, carries…

Environment
5
Friends of Hudson River Park Inc

Fundraising, marketing and communication and public policy for the hudson river park.

Recreation & Sports
6
Visiting Nurse Association of Hudson Valley Inc

Vna of hudson valley was formed to provide home health care to the people of westchester county. services include nursing; physical, occupational and speech therapy; medical social services; and home health aides. our mission is to provide…

Health
7
Northwell Health Inc

Northwell health is the parent company of a fully integrated health system that is committed to promote clinical care, health education, conduct biomedical research, and caring for the community regardless of ability to pay.

Community Improvement
8
Regional Food Bank of Northeastern New York Inc

To lead a network of partners to alleviate hunger, prevent food waste, and nourish the communities we serve. our vision is that all people have the nutritious food they need to thrive.

Food & Nutrition
9
Wmc-New York Inc

Wmc new york, inc. shall at all times be operated exclusively for charitable, scientific, and educational purposes within the meaning of section 170(c)(2)(b) and 501(c)(3) of the code, and for the purpose of engaging in various activities…

Health
10
Hudson Valley Economic Development Corporation

Economic development and promotion of the hudson valley region in new york.

Community Improvement
11
Lenox Hill Hospital

Lenox hill hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future generations…

Health
12
Horsemans Harvest Neighborhood Pantry Inc

To provide food distributions at least monthly to persons in need in the villages of Sleepy Hollow and Tarrytown New York.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Groundwork Hudson Valley Inc and the most unlike its peers is Roundabout Theatre Company Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

RIVERKEEPER INC — $366,200 · EnvironmentRIVERKEEPER INC+1 more — $10,000 · EnvironmentHISTORIC HUDSON VALLEY — $90,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORIC HUDS…+2 more — $4,000 · Arts & CultureOPEN DOOR FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 · PhilanthropyOPEN DOOR FO…NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHERN WES…GROUNDWORK HUDSON VALLEY INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyGROUNDWORK H…FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC — $35,000 · OtherFEEDING WEST…BRIDGE FUND OF NY — $30,000 · OtherBRIDGE FUND …OPEN DOOR FAMILY HEALTH CENTER — $10,000 · OtherOPEN DOOR FA…OPEN DOOR MEDICAL CENTER'S — $10,000 · OtherOPEN DOOR ME…OSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $37,000 · Human ServicesOSSINING CH…Ossining Food Pantry — $26,000 · Human ServicesOssining Fo…THE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRIDGE …TEATOWN LAKE RESERVATION INC — $55,000 · Public BenefitTHE DOE FUND INC — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterCommunity Food Pantry of Sleepy Hollow Tarrytown — $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Environment$376,200Arts & Culture$94,000Philanthropy$85,000Other$85,000Human Services$78,000Public Benefit$55,000Housing & Shelter$10,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRIVERKEEPER INC — $366,200 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetHISTORIC HUDSON VALLEY — $90,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOPEN DOOR FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTEATOWN LAKE RESERVATION INC — $55,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOSSINING CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $37,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC — $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOssining Food Pantry — $26,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetNORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGROUNDWORK HUDSON VALLEY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE DOE FUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetScenic Hudson Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Food Pantry of Sleepy Hollow Tarrytown — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTCHESTER BALLET COMPANY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The New York Community TrustNY19.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Chapman Family Foundation · St Faith's House Foundation · Hudson Road Foundation Inc · Yvonne & Leslie Pollack Family Foundation Inc · Elkes Foundation III · Td Charitable Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Agb Fund Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Agb Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Agb Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph