Skip to content

· Public charity

Afcea Education Foundation

To offer annual scholarships and grants for students and teachers in science, technology, engineering and math (stem).

$303k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Education$792kEmployment$160kYouth Development$20k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $34k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $255k
$13,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO$75,000
SCRIPPS HOWARD FOUNDATION$65,000
PIKES PEAK ROBOTICS$65,000
GOODWILL OF COLORADO$50,000
COLORADO SPRINGS SCHOOL$13,500
HARRISON SCHOOL DISTRICT$10,199
COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP FOR$10,000
OTERO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$8,100
CARSON MIDDLE SCHOOL$5,923
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 27% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CARSON MIDDLE SCHOOL: $6k → 9%UC FOUNDATION: $125k → 12%SCRIPPS HOWARD FOUNDATION: $65k → 16%DISCOVERY CANYON CAMPUS: $9k → 9%SCRIPPS HOWARD FOUNDATION: $65k → 16%MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 9%SCRIPPS HOWARD FOUNDATION: $45k → 16%FALCON AEROLAB HOME SCHOOL: $6k → 9%SCRIPPS HOWARD FOUNDATION: $45k → 16%COLORADO SPRINGS SCHOOL: $14k → 9%SCHOOL DISTRICT 11: $7k → 9%WIDEFIELD HIGH SCHOOL: $9k → 9%PIKES PEAK ROBOTICS: $75k → 9%PIKES PEAK ROBOTICS: $65k → 9%PIKES PEAK ROBOTICS: $65k → 9%PIKES PEAK ROBOTICS: $65k → 9%GOODWILL OF COLORADO: $50k → 9%GOODWILL OF COLORADO: $50k → 9%GOODWILL OF COLORADO: $50k → 9%GOODWILL OF COLORADO: $50k → 9%CARSON MIDDLE SCHOOL: $6k → 9%SPARK MINDSET: $10k → 9%COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP FOR: $10k → 9%COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP FOR: $10k → 9%COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP FOR: $10k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $82k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $75k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $44k → 9%MITCHELL HIGH SCHOOL: $6k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $17k → 9%PIKES PEAK STATE COLLEGE: $50k → 9%HARRISON SCHOOL DISTRICT: $11k → 9%HARRISON SCHOOL DISTRICT: $10k → 9%OTERO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $8k → 9%ST PAUL CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $8k → 9%HARRISON HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 9%CALHAN HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 9%PIKES PEAK BUSINESS EDUCATION: $10k → 9%LEWIS PALMER MIDDLE SCHOOL: $5k → 9%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$983k · 7 repeat orgs$291k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
12

Total granted

$983k
$264k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+2%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyEmploymentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    Pikes Peak Best
    4× · 2022–2025 · $270k · revenue +39% · 72% of their budget
  • TS
    The Scripps Howard Foundation
    4× · 2022–2025 · $220k · revenue +79%
  • GO
    Goodwill of Colorado
    4× · 2022–2025 · $200k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $125k · revenue +2%
  • PP
    PIKES PEAK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +46%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pikes Peak School of Expeditionary Learning

Provide education for students in Pre-K through 8th grade, benefitting approximately 415 students.

Education
2
Pikes Peak Athletic Foundation
Recreation & Sports
3
Pta Colorado Congress
Education
4
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
5
Kipp Colorado Schools

Kipp colorado's mission is to equip our students with the academic skills and character strengths necessary to succeed in college and careers.

Education
6
Public Broadcasting of Colorado Inc

To deliver meaningful news, music, and cultural experiences to everyone in colorado using the power of the human voice in all its forms

Arts & Culture
7
Center for Nonprofit Excellence

The Center for Nonprofit Excellence strengthens Southern Colorado's nonprofit sector through leadership and resource development, advocacy and collaboration. Together, with our partners, we are co-creating a vibrant community in the Pikes…

—
8
Ascend College Prep

Ascend College Prep is a public high school for 10-12th grade students in Colorado Springs and the surrounding area. Our Mission is to "Prepare and inspire students to become lifelong learners and responsible citizens through rigorous…

Education
9
Education Commission of the States

The mission of education commission of the states is to advocate for attaining educational excellence for all and to help state leaders identify, develop and implement public policy for education that addresses current and future needs of…

Education
10
Public Education & Business Coalition

Every child deserves a great educator. pebc works across the nation to prepare outstanding new teachers, help practicing teachers and leaders become exceptional, and shape systems and policies in order to foster vibrant growth and lasting…

Education
11
Colorado Association of School Executives

Empower colorado education leaders through advocacy, professional learning and networking to deliver on the promise of public education

—
12
Colorado State University Foundation

See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Goodwill of Colorado; the most unlike its peers is The Scripps Howard Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Pikes Peak Best: $270,490 · EducationPikes Peak BestUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $125,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATIONPIKES PEAK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · EducationPIKES PEAK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCCommunity Partnership for Child Development: $30,000 · EducationCommunity Partnership for Child Development+2 more: $23,500 · EducationREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $218,020 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF …Harrison School District 2: $26,313 · OtherHarrison School District 2COLORADO SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT 11: $18,381 · OtherCOLORADO SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTR…+10 more: $72,720 · Other+10 moreThe Scripps Howard Foundation: $220,000 · PhilanthropyThe Scripps Howard …Goodwill of Colorado: $200,000 · EmploymentGoodwill of Color…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $20,000 · Youth Development
Education$498,990Other$335,434Philanthropy$220,000Employment$200,000Youth Development$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPikes Peak Best: $270,490 over 4y, 72% of budgetThe Scripps Howard Foundation: $220,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetGoodwill of Colorado: $200,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPIKES PEAK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCommunity Partnership for Child Development: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE COLORADO SPRINGS SCHOOL: $13,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Pikes Peak Best ↗
  • Who funds The Scripps Howard Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Goodwill of Colorado ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PIKES PEAK STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Partnership for Child Development ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PIKES PEAK REGION ↗
  • Who funds THE COLORADO SPRINGS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Business and Education Alliance ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El Pomar FoundationCO15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El Pomar Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Colorado Education Initiative · Pikes Peak United Way · Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · Pikes Peak Community Foundation · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Afcea Education Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Afcea Education Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Afcea Education Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Afcea Education Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Afcea Education’s filings →

    More from the funding graph