· Private foundation
Aeb Foundation Fka the Gail & Arthur Benjamin Fdtn
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 52% of AEB FOUNDATION FKA THE GAIL & ARTHUR BENJAMIN FDTN’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IMAGE REBORN FOUNDATION | $7,000 |
| AMERICAN DOG RESCUE | $6,425 |
| ISRAEL CANCER ASSOCIATION | $5,760 |
| ACTION TO END DROWNING INC | $3,650 |
| CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF UTAH | $2,715 |
| CANCER ALLIANCE OF PALM BEACH | $2,000 |
| VARIOUS CHARITIES | $1,300 |
| PALM BEACH SYMPHONY | $1,000 |
| PALM BEACH ROUND TABLE | $460 |
| FL LAW ENFORCEMENT CANINE ASSOC | $100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–23, $850) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TPTHE PALM BEACH SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC6× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +164%
- PBPALM BEACH ROUND TABLE8× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +11%
- ATACTION TO END DROWNING INC4× · 2021–2024 · $16k · revenue ×37 · 100% of their budget
Funded once
- CCCLAUDIA CRISTIANE DE MORAESone grant, 2017 · $18k
- ICISREAL CANCER ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2022 · $14k
- EFEW Foundation Incone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +35%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the breast cancer research foundation, inc. is to prevent and cure breast cancer by advancing the world's most promising research.
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.
Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…
Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.
Our mission is to help people make sense of the complex medical and personal information about breast health and breast cancer, so they can make the best decisions for their lives.
The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…
To inspire people to care for and protect our ocean planet through education and research.
Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.
Leading Citizen scientists to promote stewardship of sustainable reef communities worldwide.
To promote, encourage and enhance research activities at the university of south florida.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Breast Cancer Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Action to End Drowning Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN DOG RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds THE PALM BEACH SYMPHONY SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF PALM ↗
- Who funds PALM BEACH ROUND TABLE ↗
- Who funds ACTION TO END DROWNING INC ↗
- Who funds EW Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY FOR CANCER RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds The Palm Beach Police and Fire Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds KIDSANCTUARY CAMPUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL CANCER ASSOCIATION (USA) CORP ↗
- Who funds Defenders of Wildlife ↗
- Who funds THE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF THE PALM BEACHES INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BLUE & YOU INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BIG CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF UTAH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lois Pope Life Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Aeb Foundation Fka the Gail & Arthur Benjamin Fdtn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- 211 Palm BeachTreasure Coast Inc — 17% of income from government
- Shalom Orlando Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Palm Beach Symphony Society Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Aeb Foundation Fka the Gail & Arthur Benjamin Fdtn?
Find your warmest path to Aeb Foundation Fka the Gail & Arthur Benjamin Fdtn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.