Skip to content

· Public charity

Advocates for Catholic Education & Organizations

Scholarships for education, clubs, and organizations

$353k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$1.1MRecreation & Sports$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $275,336, the rows itemized in this filing. The $352,997 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $77,661 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $174k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $52k
$11,161
Median grant
4
States reached
$177k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI$51,842
NORHTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY$45,479
SETON HIGH SCHOOL$36,057
ELDER HIGH SCHOOL$30,690
THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY$21,595
OHIO UNIVERSITY$15,011
Individual grant recipient$13,780
MIAMI UNIVERSITY$11,161
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$9,813
ST URSULA$8,490
CINCINNATI WEST SOCCER CLUB$7,840
ST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL$6,720
VILLA MADONNA$6,275
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA$5,383
CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY$5,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 86% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $5k → 17%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $21k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON: $6k → 14%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 15%ST URSULA: $8k → 16%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $15k → 22%DEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $6k → 14%COVINGTON CATHOLIC: $18k → 11%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $7k → 16%WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $6k → 18%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $18k → 12%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $9k → 15%CLAIRE SCHIBI MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $7k → 16%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $6k → 22%COVINGTON CATHOLIC: $14k → 11%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $6k → 16%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $11k → 12%ST URSULA: $8k → 16%THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY: $22k → 11%MIAMI UNIVERSITY: $10k → 12%CLARE SCHIBI MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $6k → 16%VILLA MADONNA: $17k → 11%ST URSULA ACADEMY: $8k → 16%VILLA MADONNA ACADEMY: $8k → 11%VILLA MADONNA: $11k → 11%ST URSULA: $7k → 16%THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 11%OUR LADY OF VISITATION: $6k → 16%VILLA MADONNA: $6k → 11%ST ANTONIUS: $8k → 16%ST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL: $7k → 16%ST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL: $7k → 16%ST XAVIER HIGH SCHOOL: $6k → 16%SETON HIGH SCHOOL: $72k → 16%SETON HIGH SCHOOL: $68k → 16%SETON HIGH SCHOOL: $61k → 16%ELDER HIGH SCHOOL: $54k → 16%ELDER HIGH SCHOOL: $37k → 16%SETON HIGH SCHOOL: $36k → 16%ELDER HIGH SCHOOL: $34k → 16%ELDER HIGH SCHOOL: $31k → 16%SETON HIGH SCHOOL: $12k → 16%MOUNT ST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY: $15k → 16%OUR LADY OF VICTORY: $9k → 16%OUR LADY OF VICTORY: $9k → 16%OUR LADY OF VICTORY: $8k → 16%CINCINNATI WEST SOCCER CLUB: $8k → 16%CINCINNATI WEST SOCCER CLUB: $6k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 17 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
7

Total granted

$1.2M
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+14%

Still filing today

24%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NK
    NORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $143k · revenue +53%
  • TM
    THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $33k · revenue +30%
  • The Ohio University Foundation
    2× · 2022–2024 · $21k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • MS
    MOUNT ST JOSEPH UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +25%
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF VICTORY
    one grant, 2021 · $9k
  • SA
    ST ANTONINUS CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
2
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
3
University of Notre Dame du Lac

See Schedule O. See explanation for Form 990, Part I, Line 1 - Organization's Mission above.

Education
4
Saint John's University

To foster the vitality of community through learning and the pursuit of wisdom.

—
5
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
6
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
7
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
8
Dominican University

Dominican University provides instruction to students seeking an Associates, Undergraduate or Graduate degree (some doctorate and certificates), and administers all of its programs without discrimination of race, color, gender, religion,…

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
Mount Saint Mary's University Inc

As a catholic university, mount st. mary's graduates ethical leaders who are inspired by a passion for learning and lead lives of significance in service to god and others.

Education
11
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
12
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thomas More University Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cincinnati West Soccer Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SETON HIGH SCHOOL: $249,132 · OtherSETON HIGH SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $173,022 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATIELDER HIGH SCHOOL: $155,973 · OtherELDER HIGH SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $136,041 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMIAMI UNIVERSITY: $59,638 · OtherMIAMI UNIVERSITYVILLA MADONNA ACADEMY: $42,255 · Other+11 more: $181,491 · Other+11 moreNORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $142,612 · EducationNORTHERN KENTUCKY UNI…THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC: $32,935 · EducationTHOMAS MORE UNIVERSIT…The Ohio University Foundation: $21,381 · EducationThe Ohio University F…MOUNT ST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY: $15,090 · EducationMOUNT ST JOSEPH UNIVE…+4 more: $22,106 · Education+4 moreCINCINNATI WEST SOCCER CLUB: $13,380 · Recreation & Sports
Other$997,552Education$234,124Recreation & Sports$13,380

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $142,612 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC: $32,935 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ohio University Foundation: $21,381 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT ST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY: $15,090 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI WEST SOCCER CLUB: $13,380 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetUniversity of Dayton: $6,061 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEPAUL UNIVERSITY: $5,710 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University: $5,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY: $5,135 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds The Ohio University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT ST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI WEST SOCCER CLUB ↗
  • Who funds University of Dayton ↗
  • Who funds DEPAUL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Creighton University ↗
  • Who funds SIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Johnson Charitable Gift FundOH25.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Horizon Community Funds of Northern Kentucky · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · The Scripps Howard Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Baird Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Advocates for Catholic Education & Organizations funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Advocates for Catholic Education & Organizations. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Advocates for Catholic Education & Organizations’ filings →

    More from the funding graph