Skip to content

· Public charity

Adventist Community Services North America Inc

Adventist community services north america (acsna) has been established as a humanitarian relief and individual/community development ministry to fulfill the mission of the seventh-day adventist church in the u.s., guam, and bermuda, which is to serve communities in christ's name.

$504k
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$3.0MCommunity Improvement$956kPublic Safety & Disaster$882kReligion$466kEnvironment$301kHousing & Shelter$294kHuman Services$214kCivil Rights$192kOther$0
02FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 29 grants below total $453,932, the rows itemized in this filing. The $504,083 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $50,151 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k24 grants · $421k
$15,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE$37,125
SOUTH CENTRAL CONFERENCE$30,000
MT VIEW CONFERENCE$30,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONFERENCE$25,000
PACIFIC UNION$20,000
NORTHEASTERN CONFERENCE$20,000
NORTH PACIFIC UNION$20,000
GEORGIA CUMBERLAND CONFERENCE$20,000
MID-AMERICA UNION$20,000
SOUTHWESTERN UNION$20,000
GUAM-MICRONESIA MISSION$20,000
SOUTH ATLANTIC CONFERENCE$18,700
SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE$15,000
ALLEGHENY EAST CONFERENCE$15,000
FLORIDA CONFERENCE$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHRISTIAN RECORDS: $50k → 13%CHRISTIAN RECORD SERVICES: $50k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NE
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 9% of Adventist Community Services North America Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Adventist Community Services North America Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.6% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.3M · 49 repeat orgs$548k to everyone else

49 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
21

Total granted

$6.3M
$548k

Still filing today

2%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NORTH AMERICAN DIVISION OF SEVENTH- DAY ADVENTISTS
    2× · 2017–2019 · $547k
  • SC
    SOUTH CENTRAL CONFERENCE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $488k
  • SA
    SOUTH ATLANTIC CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST
    7× · 2018–2024 · $364k

Funded once

  • GM
    GUAM-MICRONESIA MISSION
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • GC
    GENERAL CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST
    one grant, 2020 · $70k
  • GM
    GUAM MICRONESIA MISSION
    one grant, 2020 · $35k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
1/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NORTH AMERICAN DIVISION OF SEVENTH- DAY ADVENTISTS: $547,321 · OtherNORTH AMERICAN DIVISION OF SEVENTH- DAY ADVENTISTSSOUTH CENTRAL CONFERENCE: $488,200 · OtherSOUTH CENTRAL CONFERENCESOUTH ATLANTIC CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST: $364,414 · OtherSOUTH ATLANTIC CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTNORTHERN CALIFORNIA CONFERENCE: $265,918 · OtherBerean Seventhday Adventist Church: $264,550 · OtherCHESAPEAKE CONFERENCE: $247,000 · OtherGENERAL CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST: $236,125 · OtherNORTH PACIFIC UNION CONFERENCE: $230,000 · Other+61 more: $4,127,456 · Other+61 moreCHRISTIAN RECORD SERVICES INC: $100,000 · Human Services
Other$6,770,984Human Services$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHRISTIAN RECORD SERVICES INC: $100,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHRISTIAN RECORD SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Adventist Development & Relief Agency InternationalMD32.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Adventist Development & Relief Agency International · Winifred Stevens Foundation · Adventist Health System Sunbelt Healthcare Corporation · The Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc · Adventist Healthcare Inc · World Vision Inc · The National Association for the Exchange of Industrial Resources Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Adventist Community Services North America Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Adventist Community Services North America Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Adventist Community Services North America’s filings →

    More from the funding graph