Skip to content
Adventist Bolingbrook Hospital at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Adventist Bolingbrook Hospital

Adventist health system sunbelt healthcare corporation and all its subsidiary organizations were established by the seventh-day adventist church to bring a ministry of healing and health to the communities served.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Community Improvement$86kPhilanthropy$80kEducation$74kReligion$39kRecreation & Sports$37kHealth$32kHousing & Shelter$8k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $38,890, the rows itemized in this filing. The $46,440 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,550 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$26,890
Median grant
1
States reached
$297M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HINSDALE ADVENTIST ACADEMY$26,890
PLAINFIELD SHORWOOD AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%ANDREWS UNIVERSITY: $10k → 15%DUPAGE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $8k → 7%BOLINGBROOK SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH: $20k → 7%HINSDALE ADVENTIST ACADEMY: $27k → 7%BOLINGBROOK AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $16k → 7%HINSDALE ADVENTIST ACADEMY: $25k → 7%BOLINGBROOK AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $12k → 7%HINSDALE ADVENTIST ACADEMY: $13k → 7%BOLINGBROOK SEVENTH DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH: $10k → 7%BOLINGBROOK PARK DISTRICT: $10k → 7%BOLINGBROOK PARK DISTRICT: $9k → 7%BOLINGBROOK PARK DISTRICT: $9k → 7%BOLINGBROOK PARK DISTRICT: $9k → 7%BOLINGBROOK SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH: $9k → 7%UNITED WAY OF WILL COUNTY: $30k → 7%UNITED WAY OF WILL COUNTY: $20k → 7%WILL COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $16k → 7%WILL COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $15k → 7%WILL COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $15k → 7%UNITED WAY OF WILL COUNTY: $10k → 7%UNITED WAY OF WILL COUNTY: $10k → 7%UNITED WAY OF WILL COUNTY: $10k → 7%PLAINFIELD SHORWOOD AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $12k → 7%PRESENCE SENIOR SERVICES CHICAGOLAND DBA ASCENSION LIVING: $32k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$286k · 6 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$286k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+16%

Still filing today

50%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF WILL COUNTY
    5× · 2017–2023 · $80k · revenue -29%
  • HA
    HINSDALE ADVENTIST ACADEMY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $64k
  • WC
    WILL COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    3× · 2020–2024 · $46k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • PS
    PRESENCE SENIOR SERVICES CHICAGOLAND
    one grant, 2021 · $32k · revenue -46%
  • AU
    ANDREWS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +16%
  • BS
    BOLINGBROOK SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $9k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boone Area Chamber of Commerce

To enhance the economic vitality and quality of life in boone county

Community Improvement
2
Chamber of Commerce - Greater Beloit

Chamber of commerce to support, ancourage and engage in activities that make the greater Beloit area a better place to live and do business.

Education
3
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
4
Siouxland Chamber of Commerce

Improve the quality of the siouxland area

—
5
Cook County Chamber
Philanthropy
6
Chamber of Commerce of Columbia Cou

To be the leading voice of business in coumbia county providing advocacy, promotion, and benefit solutions to its members.

—
7
Howard County Chamber of Commerce

To represent the business community of howard county, maryland

—
8
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—
9
Highland Park Chamber of Commerce Inc

Local chamber of commerce

—
10
St Charles Chamber of Commerce

We advocate for our business community by developing opportunities and partnerships that strengthen the economic prosperity and sustainability of our region.

—
11
Harbor Country Chamber of Commerce

To promote business and economic development for eight towns in southwest michigan.

—
12
Lakeshore Chamber of Commerce

To be a voice for business and a forum for the exchange of ideas and through a variety of chamber programs and services, strengthen the economic vitality of east chicago, hammond, and northwest indiana.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Midwest Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Andrews University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HINSDALE ADVENTIST ACADEMY: $64,390 · OtherHINSDALE ADVENTIST ACADEMYWILL COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $46,250 · OtherWILL COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCEBOLINGBROOK PARK DISTRICT: $37,000 · OtherBOLINGBROOK PARK DISTRICTILLINOIS CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTS: $30,000 · OtherILLINOIS CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH DAY ADVENTISTSPLAINFIELD SHOREWOOD AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $12,000 · OtherPLAINFIELD SHOREWOOD AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCEBOLINGBROOK SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH: $8,851 · OtherDUPAGE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $7,500 · OtherUNITED WAY OF WILL COUNTY: $80,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF WILL COUNTYPRESENCE SENIOR SERVICES CHICAGOLAND: $32,029 · HealthPRESENCE S…BOLINGBROOK AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $28,000 · Community ImprovementANDREWS UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · Education
Other$205,991Philanthropy$80,000Health$32,029Community Improvement$28,000Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF WILL COUNTY: $80,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetWILL COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $46,250 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetPRESENCE SENIOR SERVICES CHICAGOLAND: $32,029 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOLINGBROOK AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $28,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetPLAINFIELD SHOREWOOD AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $12,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetANDREWS UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUPAGE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Adventist Midwest Hea…Adventist Health Syst…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Adventist Midwest HealthIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Adventist Midwest Health · Adventist Health System Sunbelt Healthcare Corporation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Adventist Bolingbrook Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Adventist Bolingbrook Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Adventist Bolingbrook Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home