· Private foundation
Advansix Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $70k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $168k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AICHE FOUNDATION | $168,000 |
| RECTOR AND VISITORS OF THE UNVERSITY OF VIRGINIA | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS | $20,000 |
| GLOBAL COMPACT NETWORK USA | $15,000 |
| REBUILDING TOGETHER NORTH JERSEY | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS | $6,816 |
| MANUFACTURERS ALLIANCE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| THE FRIENDS OF THE LOWER APPOMATTOX RIVER PARTNERSHIP | $3,000 |
| NRCC EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC | $2,500 |
| UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS | $2,500 |
| HOPEWELL DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP | $1,500 |
| JOHN RANDOLPH FOUNDATION INC | $1,200 |
| AMERICAN CIVIL WAR MUSEUM | $1,000 |
| BRIDESBURG FOOD PANTRY | $1,000 |
| VIRGINIA HOLOCAUST MUSEUM | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGlobal Compact Network USA Inc3× · 2022–2024 · $38k · revenue +17%
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches2× · 2022–2024 · $29k · revenue +23%
- MAMANUFACTURERS ALLIANCE FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +57%
Funded once
- RTREBUILDING TOGETHER OF RICHMONDone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -17%
- FEFERTILIZER EDUCATION RESEARCH AND TRAINING FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +30%
- HFHOPEWELL FOOD PANTRYgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +32%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The virginia association of museums is a statewide network serving the museum community. the association's mission statement is "the virginia association of museums helps our museum community succeed".
Trade association for electric cooperatives
GRP's mission is to aggressively generate economic opportunities that create quality jobs for residents in the region and increase the tax base for needed community services.
The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…
To assist rural virginians in developing and advancing their agricultural, economic and social interests to enhance their quality of life.
To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…
Promoting for the benefit of the general public, the preservation, protection and enjoyment of our natural resources, principally in the lower james, york, rappahannock and chowan rivers and surrounding watersheds.
The virginia capital trail foundation exists to protect, promote, and enhance the virginia capital trail and engage communities around it.
Chamberrva is the trusted voice for modern business in the richmond virginia region. we are change agents, rallying to do the hard things that will create a more connected, prosperous, health and equitable community.
The mission of the national museum of industrial history, in affiliation with the smithsonian institute is: to forge a connection between america's industrial past and the innovations of today by educating the public and inspiring the…
Our mission is to ensure the availability, access, and affordability of locally produced food by connecting local farmers and all members of the community through programs, awareness, and advocacy.
The Foundation implements programs and projects which support the goals of the Museum. The responsibilities include solicitation, receipt and disbursements
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is John Randolph Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Virginia Holocaust Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Global Compact Network USA Inc ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER NORTH JERSEY INC ↗
- Who funds MANUFACTURERS ALLIANCE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER OF RICHMOND ↗
- Who funds FERTILIZER EDUCATION RESEARCH AND TRAINING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOPEWELL FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE LOWER APPOMATTOX RIVER ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds JOHN RANDOLPH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Virginia Holocaust Museum ↗
- Who funds HOPEWELL DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds THE VALENTINE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FORKIDS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · The Cameron Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Advansix Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.