Skip to content

· Public charity

Advanced Education Research & Development Fund

Aerdf will conduct inclusive research and development programs so that diverse teams of educators, researchers and developers can tackle intractable teaching and learning challenges that disproportionately affect black and latino students, and (continued on schedule o) students of all races experiencing poverty.

$327k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$74k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$824kYouth Development$76kEmployment$11k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $297,367, the rows itemized in this filing. The $326,867 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $29,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $207k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $74k
$20,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$52M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JACKSON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT$74,000
TEJANO CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CONCERNS INC$48,000
DISTINCTIVE SCHOOLS$41,000
ALIQUIPPA SCHOOL DISTRICT$25,600
CHANGE THE TUNE INC$20,000
DIVERSE CHARTER SCHOOLS COALITION$20,000
ELITE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$19,000
CITIZENS OF THE WORLD CHARTER SCHOOLS - LOS ANGELES$12,600
THE URBAN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC$10,500
GOOD TUTORS$10,000
NEVADA RISE ACADEMY INC$8,667
CHICAGO MOBILE MAKERS$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ALIQUIPPA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $26k → 10%MILPITAS UNITED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $31k → 8%ELITE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $19k → 10%VISTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $117k → 11%CHANGE THE TUNE INC: $20k → 14%DIVERSE CHARTER SCHOOLS COALITION: $20k → 17%TEJANO CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CONCERNS INC: $48k → 16%THE URBAN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $11k → 14%MIDDLETOWN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $89k → 12%THE HARDY CENTER INC: $9k → 15%DISTINCTIVE SCHOOLS: $41k → 14%EAST JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $14k → 20%JACKSON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT: $74k → 23%NEWARK BOARD OF EDUCATION: $104k → 16%NEVADA RISE ACADEMY INC: $9k → 13%VISTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $58k → 11%GOOD TUTORS: $10k → 14%MIDDLETOWN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $44k → 12%CHICAGO MOBILE MAKERS: $8k → 14%NEWARK BOARD OF EDUCATION: $52k → 16%CITIZENS OF THE WORLD CHARTER SCHOOLS - LOS ANGELES: $13k → 14%MERIDIAN PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT: $38k → 12%MIDDLETOWN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $33k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CA
DC
MS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$560k · 3 repeat orgs$351k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
3

Total granted

$560k
$53k

Still filing today

0%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $297k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureEmploymentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MIDDLETOWN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
    3× · 2021–2023 · $203k
  • MX
    Malcolm X Shabazz High School
    3× · 2021–2023 · $181k
  • VU
    VISTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
    2× · 2021–2022 · $175k

Funded once

  • MU
    MILPITAS UNITED SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $31k
  • EJ
    EAST JASPER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2022 · $14k
  • TH
    THE HARDY CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $9k · revenue +134%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tomorrow's Leadership Collaborative Charter School

The mission of tlc is to educate diverse students through a rigorous, standards-based, collegepreparatory program to become conscientious, caring, and responsible 21st century citizens. tlc is grounded in an inclusive vision of teaching…

—
2
Chicago Collegiate Inc

To equip all students in grades six through twelve with the academic skills, intellectual habits and character traits to succeed in the college of their choice, strenghten their communities and change the world.

Education
3
Creative City Public Charter School Foundation Inc

Creative City Public Charter School's teachers, students and parents share governance and cooperate on curriculum and community decisions, building on the inquisitive nature of children to drive the project-based arts-integrated…

Education
4
Urban Discovery Schools

Urban discovery academy develops design thinkers who lead by example, making active, positive contributions to their local and global communities.

Education
5
Elevate Collegiate Inc dba Elevate Collegiate Charter School

To equip all students with the academic knowledge and character development necessary to set forth confidently on the path to college and life filled with success.

Education
6
Learning By Design Inc

Learning by design, a new tk/k-5 charter school in south los angeles, is designed to foster educational equity and cultivate diverse students becoming thoughtful and courageous change makers and problem solvers of tomorrow, through a…

Education
7
Carbon Valley Academy

To provide rich content and solid skills instruction in an environment that champions character and personal academic achievement. carbon valley provides a public eduction to students preschool through grade 8.

Education
8
Darnall Charter School

We are committed to academic excellence by vigorously engaging students in a rigorous, student-centered learning environment that will foster the development of global citizens.

Education
9
Vega Collegiate Academy

Vega Collegiate Academy is designed with an extended school day and a slightly longer school year focusing on developing strong skills in literacy and math. It executes an academically rigorous curriculum aligned with common core standards…

Education
10
West Ridge Academy Charter School

West Ridge Academy Charter School is a K-8 Public School with the vision to prepare each student with an exemplary educational experience allowing each student to meet his or her highest academic and character potential.

Education
11
Discovery Charter School

Dcs provides a high-quality education in a safe and supportive learning community for students and families, empowers students with diverse talents, delivers rigorous and culturally relevant instruction, and fosters creativity, inquiry,…

Education
12
City Neighbors Charter School Inc

To provide an extraordinary public school education with high academic achievement for all students. Our ultimate goal is that through Project Based Learning, arts integration, parental involvement and community outreach, the students…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Diverse Charter Schools Coalition Inc; the most unlike its peers is Chicago Mobile Makers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
3/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MIDDLETOWN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $203,400 · OtherMIDDLETOWN CITY SCHOOL DISTRICTMalcolm X Shabazz High School: $180,880 · OtherMalcolm X Shabazz High SchoolVISTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $175,422 · OtherVISTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTJACKSON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT: $74,000 · OtherJACKSON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTMILPITAS UNITED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $31,000 · OtherALIQUIPPA SCHOOL DISTRICT: $25,600 · Other+2 more: $23,947 · OtherDistinctive Schools of Illinois: $41,000 · EducationDistinctive …DIVERSE CHARTER SCHOOLS COALITION INC: $20,000 · EducationDIVERSE CHAR…ELITE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $19,000 · EducationELITE PUBLIC…Citizens of the World Charter Schools Los Angeles: $12,600 · EducationCitizens of …Nevada Rise Academy: $8,667 · EducationNevada Rise …TEJANO CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CONCERNS INC: $48,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHICAGO MOBILE MAKERS: $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHANGE THE TUNE INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureTHE URBAN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $10,500 · EmploymentTHE HARDY CENTER INC: $8,500 · Public Benefit
Other$714,249Education$101,267Youth Development$56,000Arts & Culture$20,000Employment$10,500Public Benefit$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTEJANO CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CONCERNS INC: $48,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDistinctive Schools of Illinois: $41,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHANGE THE TUNE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetDIVERSE CHARTER SCHOOLS COALITION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetELITE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $19,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCitizens of the World Charter Schools Los Angeles: $12,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE URBAN ALLIANCE FOUNDATION INC: $10,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNevada Rise Academy: $8,667 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HARDY CENTER INC: $8,500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCHICAGO MOBILE MAKERS: $8,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Schools FundCA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Schools Fund · Local Initiatives Support Corporation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Advanced Education Research & Development Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Advanced Education Research & Development Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Advanced Education Research & Development’s filings →

    More from the funding graph