Skip to content

· Public charity

Adult & Teen Challenge New England and New Jersey Inc

To provide adults and families with an effective and comprehensive christian faith-based solution to drug, alcohol, and other life-controlling problems in order to become productive members of society

$188k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$218kYouth Development$62kHealth$45kHuman Services$25kCrime & Legal$7k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $80,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $187,950 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $107,450 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $31k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$29M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE NYC$50,000
ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE USA$30,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 71% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMIRAH NEW ENGLAND: $7k → 8%NORTHPOINT BIBLE COLLEGE: $6k → 10%TEEN CHALLENGE INTL SOUTHERN CALIF: $12k → 11%ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE NYC: $50k → 7%NEW YORK ADULT AND TEEN CHALLENGE: $25k → 14%ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE USA: $31k → 8%UNMUTED: $7k → 14%GLOBAL TEEN CHALLENGE INC: $15k → 18%EASTERN EUROPE OUTREACH INC: $53k → 15%ADULT AND TEEN CHALLENGE VIRGINIA: $25k → 6%ADULT & TEECH CHALLENGE USA: $10k → 8%GLOBAL TEEN CHALLENGE INC: $12k → 18%EASTERN EUROPE OUTREACH INC: $48k → 15%GLOBAL TEEN CHALLENGE INC: $12k → 18%EASTERN EUROPE OUTREACH INC: $30k → 15%GLOBAL TEEN CHALLENGE INC: $7k → 18%EASTERN EUROPE OUTREACH INC: $24k → 15%EASTERN EUROPE OUTREACH INC: $23k → 15%EASTERN EUROPE OUTREACH INC: $12k → 15%EASTERN EUROPE OUTREACH INC: $12k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
GA

Grants abroad, by region: $107k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Netherlands$26k · 24% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: MISSION SUPPORT

Slovenia$18k · 17% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: MISSION SUPPORT

Georgia$18k · 17% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: MISSION SUPPORT

Jamacia$17k · 16% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: MISSION SUPPORT

Albania$13k · 12% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: MISSION SUPPORT

Austria$9k · 8% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: MISSION SUPPORT

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$6k · 5% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: MISSION SUPPORT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$304k · 3 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$304k
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-11%
+8%

Still filing today

67%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EE
    EASTERN EUROPE OUTREACH
    7× · 2017–2023 · $202k
  • GT
    GLOBAL TEEN CHALLENGE INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $62k · revenue -11%
  • AT
    ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE USA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $41k · revenue -18%

Funded once

  • AT
    ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE VIRGINIA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +8%
  • LI
    LONG ISLAND TEEN CHALLENGE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -39%
  • TC
    TEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTH CALIF INC
    one grant, 2020 · $12k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Teen Challenge Inc

The religious organization's mission is to help individuals who have life-controlling addictions and initiate the discipleship process to the point where the individual can function as a productive christian member of society.

—
2
Teen Challenge of the Mid-South Inc

The mission of teen challenge of the mid-south is to provide men and women over the age of 18 a christ-centered opportunity to overcome substance abuse or other life-controlling issues through residential long-term spiritual and clinical…

Health
3
Teen Challenge of Monterey Bay Inc

Promote the gospel of christ through christian discipleship to help people become mentally sound,emotionally balanced, socially adjusted, physically well, spiritually alive and employment ready.

Health
4
Northern Appalachian Teen Challenge Inc

None

Health
5
Teen Challenge Illinois

Adult & Teen Challenge of the Greater Midwest (ATCGM) is a residential, Christian, faith-based discipleship and recovery support program dedicated to rebuilding the lives of men (18 and older) who have been devastated by life controlling…

—
6
Adult & Teen Challenge New England and New Jersey Inc

To provide adults and families with an effective and comprehensive christian faith-based solution to drug, alcohol, and other life-controlling problems in order to become productive members of society

Health
7
Adult & Teen Challenge of New Inc

A faith-based residential recovery program to help individuals attain freedom form chemical addictions by addressing their spiritual, physical and emotional needs.

Health
8
Teen Challenge of Baltimore Inc

The mission of teen challenge of baltimore is to provide individuals and their families with an effective and comprehensive faith-based solution to substanceabuse and life-controlling issues in order for them to become productivemembers of…

Health
9
Adult & Teen Challenge of Sandhills North Carolina

Teen challenge is the home of the faith-based recovery program where lives are changed. we are committed to rekindling hope, renewing life, and restoring families by reaching out to men and women with life-controlling problems.

Arts & Culture
10
Minnesota Teen Challenge Inc

Our mission is to assist teens and adults in gaining freedom from chemical addictions and other life controlling problems by addressing their physical, emotional, and spiritual needs.

Health
11
Tri-State Teen Challenge

A 12-15 month residential program to help men ages 18-64 become free from life controlling addictions.

—
12
Teen Challenge of Nevada Inc

Providing successful recovery for men, women and teens with destructive, addictive and abusive lifestyles through mentoring, education, training and spiritual direction.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adult & Teen Challenge Usa; the most unlike its peers is Amirah Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EASTERN EUROPE OUTREACH: $201,515 · OtherEASTERN EUROPE OUTREACHADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE NYC: $50,000 · OtherADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE NYCADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE USA: $40,500 · OtherADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE USAGLOBAL TEEN CHALLENGE INC: $62,175 · HealthGLOBAL TEEN CHALLENGE INCADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE VIRGINIA INC: $25,000 · HealthADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE VIRGINIA IN…LONG ISLAND TEEN CHALLENGE INC: $25,000 · HealthLONG ISLAND TEEN CHALLENGE INCTEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTH CALIF INC: $12,400 · HealthTEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTH CALIF INCUNMUTED: $7,400 · HealthUNMUTEDAmirah Inc: $7,200 · Crime & LegalNORTHPOINT BIBLE COLLEGE: $6,000 · Education
Other$292,015Health$131,975Crime & Legal$7,200Education$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGLOBAL TEEN CHALLENGE INC: $62,175 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE USA: $40,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE VIRGINIA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetTEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTH CALIF INC: $12,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNMUTED: $7,400 over 1y, 16% of budgetAmirah Inc: $7,200 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHPOINT BIBLE COLLEGE: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Adult & Teen Challenge New England and New Jersey Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Adult & Teen Challenge New England and New Jersey Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Adult & Teen Challenge New England and New Jersey Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Adult & Teen Challenge New England and New Jersey Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Adult & Teen Challenge New England and New Jersey’s filings →

    More from the funding graph