Skip to content

· Private foundation

Adish and Asha Jain Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$275k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$117k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$702kEducation$644kYouth Development$254kReligion$230kHealth$199kHousing & Shelter$100kInternational$41kArts & Culture$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $262k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION$116,959
SRI RAM GOBURDHUN CHARITABLE TRUST$80,000
AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION$64,988
EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA$10,000
INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER$1,000
INDIA TEMPLE ASSOCIATION$1,000
YARD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$1,000
CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 87% of grant dollars ($1.9M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 13% that went abroad ($296k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION: $175k → 8%AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION: $250k → 14%SRI RAM GOBURDHUN CHARITABLE TRUST: $80k → 13%TEXAS HINDU CAMPSITE: $11k → 8%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $151k → 16%JAIN ACADEMIC FOUNDATION OF NORTH A: $15k → 17%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $40k → 7%CREC - ACADEMY OF SCIENCE AND INNOVATION: $4k → 11%KPSNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 7%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $3k → 13%ROUNDGLASS FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%JAINA: $1k → 7%INDIA TEMPLE ASSOCIATION: $50k → 12%AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%SRI RAM GOBURDHUN CHARITABLE TRUST: $80k → 13%THE TEXAS INDIA FORUM: $10k → 8%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $100k → 16%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $37k → 7%INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER: $100k → 7%AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION: $117k → 14%SRI RAM GOBURDHUN CHARITABLE TRUST: $54k → 13%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $100k → 16%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $16k → 7%INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER: $10k → 7%AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION: $103k → 14%SRI RAM GOBURDHUN CHARITABLE TRUST: $40k → 13%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $77k → 16%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $16k → 7%AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION: $65k → 14%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $50k → 16%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $16k → 7%PROJECT HOPE OF CAMDEN: $2k → 12%AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION: $12k → 14%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $50k → 16%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $12k → 7%AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $31k → 16%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $10k → 7%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $29k → 16%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $8k → 7%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $17k → 16%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $5k → 7%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $10k → 16%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $5k → 7%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $10k → 16%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $4k → 7%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $4k → 7%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
OH
NJ
CT
CA
NC
DC
GA
TX

Beyond the US: 13% of all-years giving ($296k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$296k · 9 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 54% of Adish and Asha Jain Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Adish and Asha Jain Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 53% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 7 repeat orgs$261k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against -52% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
15

Total granted

$1.9M
$260k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
-52%

Still filing today

43%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHealthFood & NutritionInternationalHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $701k · revenue +46%
  • EV
    EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $624k · revenue +41%
  • IT
    INDIA TEMPLE ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2020–2025 · $52k · revenue +126%

Funded once

  • SE
    SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA
    one grant, 2024 · $175k · revenue 0%
  • LE
    LIONS EYE HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2022 · $22k
  • JA
    JAIN ACADEMIC FOUNDATION OF NORTH A
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sai Spiritual Foundation

Help establish unity of faith and welcome all spiritual seekers of all religions; realize the Inherent Divinity within as per Sathya SaiBaba

Religion
2
Akhand Jyoti Usa

Eradicate cureable blindness, girls education, and women empowerment in the rural india

Health
3
India Foundation

Healthcare and education for the needy

Human Services
4
Anurag Society Dba Diya Social Services

Anurag Society exists to bring hope for a promising future to the lives of impoverished individuals and families in India.

International
5
The American India Foundation

The american india foundation(aif) is a nonprofit american development organization that is devoted to accelerating social and economic change in india.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Vedic Sadhana Foundation

Promoting well being of individuals through the education and assistance of mindful living, meditation, and education of vedic and indian practices.

Education
7
Indiaspora

Transforming the success of the indian diaspora into meaningful impact worldwide.

Human Services
8
Friends of Teach for India Inc

Empowering mobilizers like teach for india with intellectual, human, and financial resources to eliminate educational inequity in india.

Education
9
Ashra Charitable Fund Inc

Provide financial assistance to orphanages,old-age homes, provide educational scholarships to orphans, arrange health camps and food drives for orphanages and old-age homes.

International
10
4 S Foundation Inc

Educate, train, and provide assistance to create water systems and provide healthcare facilities for the poor population in india.

—
11
Blind Foundation for India

The Blind Foundation for India(BFI)Charter is to prevent and cure blindness and rehabilitate permanently blind people in India. BFI provides support for free cataract operations, Braille kits, Mobile Vans, Eye Hospital equipments, and…

International
12
Karuna-Shechen Usa

Karuna-shechen initiates and oversees projects that provide health care, education, and social services for the under-served populations of india, nepal, and tibet.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Akshaya Patra Foundation (Usa); the most unlike its peers is Texas Hindu Campsite Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $701,444 · Food & NutritionAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA)SRI RAM GOBURDHUN CHARITABLE TRUST: $254,200 · OtherSRI RAM GOBURDHUN CHARITABLE TRUSTCONNECTICUT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY INC THE: $176,328 · OtherCONNECTICUT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SO…INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER: $111,400 · OtherINDIAN CULTURAL CENTERINDIA TEMPLE ASSOCIATION: $52,000 · OtherINDIA TEMPLE ASSOCIATION+11 more: $77,182 · Other+11 moreEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $624,218 · InternationalEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USASANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $175,000 · HealthSANKARA E…+1 more: $2,500 · HealthKPSNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyROUNDGLASS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTEXAS HINDU CAMPSITE INC: $11,000 · Youth DevelopmentSewa International Inc: $501 · Human Services
Food & Nutrition$701,444Other$671,110International$624,218Health$177,500Philanthropy$15,000Youth Development$11,000Human Services$501

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $701,444 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $624,218 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $175,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetINDIA TEMPLE ASSOCIATION: $52,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetTEXAS HINDU CAMPSITE INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTEXAS INDIA FORUM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKPSNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetROUNDGLASS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF SOUTH JERSEY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
  • Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
  • Who funds SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds INDIA TEMPLE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS HINDU CAMPSITE INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS INDIA FORUM ↗
  • Who funds KPSNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROUNDGLASS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF SOUTH JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds Sewa International Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Adish and Asha Jain Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Adish and Asha Jain Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Food Bank of South Jersey Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Adish and Asha Jain Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Adish and Asha Jain Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Adish and Asha Jain’s filings →

More from the funding graph