Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Adish and Asha Jain Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$275k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$117k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Food & Nutrition$702kEducation$644kYouth Development$254kReligion$230kHealth$199kHousing & Shelter$100kInternational$41kArts & Culture$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $262k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION$116,959
SRI RAM GOBURDHUN CHARITABLE TRUST$80,000
AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION$64,988
EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA$10,000
INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER$1,000
INDIA TEMPLE ASSOCIATION$1,000
YARD EDUCATION FOUNDATION$1,000
CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

Your US giving87% of grant dollars ($1.9M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 13% that went abroad ($296k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION: $175k → 8%AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION: $250k → 14%SRI RAM GOBURDHUN CHARITABLE TRUST: $80k → 13%TEXAS HINDU CAMPSITE: $11k → 8%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $151k → 16%JAIN ACADEMIC FOUNDATION OF NORTH A: $15k → 17%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $40k → 7%CREC - ACADEMY OF SCIENCE AND INNOVATION: $4k → 11%KPSNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 7%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $3k → 13%ROUNDGLASS FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%JAINA: $1k → 7%INDIA TEMPLE ASSOCIATION: $50k → 12%AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%SRI RAM GOBURDHUN CHARITABLE TRUST: $80k → 13%THE TEXAS INDIA FORUM: $10k → 8%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $100k → 16%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $37k → 7%INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER: $100k → 7%AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION: $117k → 14%SRI RAM GOBURDHUN CHARITABLE TRUST: $54k → 13%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $100k → 16%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $16k → 7%INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER: $10k → 7%AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION: $103k → 14%SRI RAM GOBURDHUN CHARITABLE TRUST: $40k → 13%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $77k → 16%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $16k → 7%AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION: $65k → 14%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $50k → 16%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $16k → 7%PROJECT HOPE OF CAMDEN: $2k → 12%AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION: $12k → 14%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $50k → 16%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $12k → 7%AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $31k → 16%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $10k → 7%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $29k → 16%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $8k → 7%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $17k → 16%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $5k → 7%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $10k → 16%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $5k → 7%EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $10k → 16%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $4k → 7%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $4k → 7%CT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
OH
NJ
CT
CA
NC
DC
GA
TX

Beyond the US13% of all-years giving ($296k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$296k · 9 grants

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 54% of Adish and Asha Jain Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Adish and Asha Jain Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 53% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 7 repeat orgs$261k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
15

Total granted

$1.9M
$260k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
0%

Still filing today

43%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHealthFood & NutritionInternationalHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $701k · revenue +46%
  • EV
    EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $624k · revenue +41%
  • IT
    INDIA TEMPLE ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2020–2025 · $52k · revenue +126%

Funded once

  • SE
    SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA
    one grant, 2024 · $175k · revenue 0%
  • LE
    LIONS EYE HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2022 · $22k
  • JA
    JAIN ACADEMIC FOUNDATION OF NORTH A
    one grant, 2022 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sai Spiritual Foundation

Help establish unity of faith and welcome all spiritual seekers of all religions; realize the Inherent Divinity within as per Sathya SaiBaba

Religion
2
Akhand Jyoti Usa

Eradicate cureable blindness, girls education, and women empowerment in the rural india

Health
3
India Foundation

Healthcare and education for the needy

Human Services
4
Anurag Society Dba Diya Social Services

Anurag Society exists to bring hope for a promising future to the lives of impoverished individuals and families in India.

International
5
The American India Foundation

The american india foundation(aif) is a nonprofit american development organization that is devoted to accelerating social and economic change in india.

Public Safety & Disaster
6
Vedic Sadhana Foundation

Promoting well being of individuals through the education and assistance of mindful living, meditation, and education of vedic and indian practices.

Education
7
Indiaspora

Transforming the success of the indian diaspora into meaningful impact worldwide.

Human Services
8
Friends of Teach for India Inc

Empowering mobilizers like teach for india with intellectual, human, and financial resources to eliminate educational inequity in india.

Education
9
Ashra Charitable Fund Inc

Provide financial assistance to orphanages,old-age homes, provide educational scholarships to orphans, arrange health camps and food drives for orphanages and old-age homes.

International
10
4 S Foundation Inc

Educate, train, and provide assistance to create water systems and provide healthcare facilities for the poor population in india.

11
Blind Foundation for India

The Blind Foundation for India(BFI)Charter is to prevent and cure blindness and rehabilitate permanently blind people in India. BFI provides support for free cataract operations, Braille kits, Mobile Vans, Eye Hospital equipments, and…

International
12
Karuna-Shechen Usa

Karuna-shechen initiates and oversees projects that provide health care, education, and social services for the under-served populations of india, nepal, and tibet.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Akshaya Patra Foundation (Usa) and the most unlike its peers is Texas Hindu Campsite Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) — $701,444 · Food & NutritionAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA)SRI RAM GOBURDHUN CHARITABLE TRUST — $254,200 · OtherSRI RAM GOBURDHUN CHARITABLE TRUSTCONNECTICUT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SOCIETY INC THE — $176,328 · OtherCONNECTICUT VALLEY HINDU TEMPLE SO…INDIAN CULTURAL CENTER — $111,400 · OtherINDIAN CULTURAL CENTERINDIA TEMPLE ASSOCIATION — $52,000 · OtherINDIA TEMPLE ASSOCIATION+11 more — $77,182 · Other+11 moreEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA — $624,218 · InternationalEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USASANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA — $175,000 · HealthSANKARA E…+1 more — $2,500 · HealthKPSNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyROUNDGLASS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyTEXAS HINDU CAMPSITE INC — $11,000 · Youth DevelopmentSewa International Inc — $501 · Human Services
Food & Nutrition$701,444Other$671,110International$624,218Health$177,500Philanthropy$15,000Youth Development$11,000Human Services$501

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) — $701,444 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA — $624,218 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA — $175,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetINDIA TEMPLE ASSOCIATION — $52,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetTEXAS HINDU CAMPSITE INC — $11,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTEXAS INDIA FORUM — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKPSNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetROUNDGLASS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF SOUTH JERSEY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA)
  • Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA
  • Who funds SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA
  • Who funds INDIA TEMPLE ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds TEXAS HINDU CAMPSITE INC
  • Who funds TEXAS INDIA FORUM
  • Who funds KPSNA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ROUNDGLASS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF SOUTH JERSEY INC
  • Who funds Sewa International Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Adish and Asha Jain Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Food Bank of South Jersey Inc30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Adish and Asha Jain Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Adish and Asha Jain Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph