· Private foundation
Adient Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k23 grants · $117k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $249k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $286k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY UNITED WAY | $185,903 |
| DETROIT POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE | $100,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HURON VALLEY | $40,000 |
| LIFE REMODELED | $34,000 |
| AUCC INC | $30,000 |
| CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY | $25,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE | $19,885 |
| UNITED WAY OF BLUEGRASS KY | $16,423 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHEASTERN | $12,500 |
| NATIONAL MERIT SCHOLARSHIP CORPORATION | $11,630 |
| GILDA'S CLUB OF METRO DETROIT | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $10,000 |
| SME EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE MICHIGAN | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
44 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $129k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PCPLYMOUTH COMMUNITY UNITED WAY5× · 2020–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +50% · 25% of their budget
DETROIT POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INCORPORATED3× · 2022–2024 · $900k · revenue +75%- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HURON VALLEY5× · 2020–2024 · $185k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- DPDETROIT PALone grant, 2021 · $400k
- DPDETROIT PAL FUNDRAISING FOUNDATIONone grant, 2020 · $400k · revenue -100% · 52% of their budget
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +39%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…
To unite the community by developing resources to meet the community needs.
Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.
United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…
Uniting our community to empower individuals and families to thrive.
United way of the midlands mission is "we unite our community's caring spirit to build a stronger tomorrow".
The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.
In order to mobilize community resources to help people measurably improve their lives - we work collaboratively with our community to identify priorities, and then decide which strategies, dollars, and partnerships should be used to bring…
To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.
United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…
United way's mission is to improve lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Washtenaw County and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
93 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 93 of the 143 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PLYMOUTH COMMUNITY UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds DETROIT POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds DETROIT PAL FUNDRAISING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HURON VALLEY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER MILWAUKEE & WAUKESHA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds FOCUSHOPE ↗
- Who funds DETROIT REGIONAL CHAMBER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RACQUET UP DETROIT ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds DETROIT REGIONAL CHAMBER ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE REMODELED ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
- Who funds MILWAUKEE REPERTORY THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds CAREHOUSE OF OAKLAND COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds THE VICTORY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CASA of Cannon and Dekalb Counties ↗
- Who funds National Merit Scholarship Corporation ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS LITERACY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Canines For Change Inc ↗
- Who funds SECUREFUTURES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dte Energy Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Ford Philanthropy · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · Jim and Ginger Jurries Foundation · The Kresge Foundation · The Barton Malow Foundation · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Adient Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.