Skip to content

· Private foundation

Adesso Nonprofit Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$121k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$262kArts & Culture$227kYouth Development$42kPhilanthropy$36kHuman Services$35kAnimals$20kPublic Benefit$12kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $53k
$4,895
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WVUSD$13,013
DBCAA$10,000
DIAMOND BAR HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
Community Foundation of Greenville co TD Synnex Share the Magic$10,000
Chinese American Parents Association of Walnut$10,000
DBCAA$9,998
WALNUT DIAMOND BAR STATION FUND$5,000
Chinese American Professionals Association$5,000
DIAMOND BAR HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
WVUSD$5,000
SACPAA$5,000
CAPADBHS$5,000
DIAMOND BAR HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
DBCAA$4,895
Chinese American Professionals Association$3,998
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Chinese American Parents Association of Walnut: $10k → 9%Community Foundation of Orange: $5k → 10%Various: $32k → 14%MAUI FOOD BANK: $10k → 9%Community Foundation of Greenville co TD Synnex Share the Magic: $10k → 10%WALNUT HIGH SCHOOL: $30k → 14%Community Foundation of Greenville co TD Synnex Share the Magic: $10k → 10%CIE USA: $20k → 14%WALNUT HIGH SCHOOL: $20k → 14%WVUSD: $13k → 14%Walnut High School: $10k → 14%Chinese American Parents Association of Walnut: $10k → 14%Walnut High School: $10k → 14%WVUSD: $10k → 14%WVUSD: $5k → 14%WALNUT DIAMOND BAR STATION FUND: $5k → 14%SAN MUSAE CULTURE CENTER: $64k → 14%SINO-AMERICAN CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTS ASSOCIATION: $12k → 14%San Musae Culture Center: $10k → 14%SAN MUSAE CULTURE CENTER: $10k → 14%SACPAA: $5k → 14%SACPAA: $5k → 14%SAN MUSAE CULTURE CENTER: $5k → 14%Chinese American Professionals Association: $5k → 14%TAIWAN CENTER FOUNDATION OF GREATER LOS ANGLES: $6k → 14%Pomona Economic Opportunity Center: $10k → 14%POMONA HOPE: $20k → 14%JU4Y: $10k → 14%POMONA HOPE: $10k → 14%JU4Y: $10k → 14%DBCAA: $34k → 14%DIAMOND BAR HIGH SCHOOL: $30k → 14%DIAMOND BAR HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 14%DIAMOND BAR HIGH SCHOOL WALNUT HIGH SCHOOL WALNUT POLICE STATION DBCAA: $22k → 14%Brahma Foundation: $20k → 14%Diamond Bar Chinese American Associ: $20k → 14%Walnut High School: $15k → 14%DBCAA: $10k → 14%DIAMOND BAR HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 14%DBCAA: $10k → 14%DBCAA: $10k → 14%TACF: $10k → 14%DBCAA: $10k → 14%DIAMOND BAR HIGH SCHOOL: $9k → 14%DBCAA: $7k → 14%DIAMOND BAR HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 14%DIAMOND BAR HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 14%Global Dynasty Lions Club: $12k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$463k · 9 repeat orgs$246k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +115% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
16

Total granted

$463k
$212k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+115%
0%

Still filing today

22%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyEmploymentAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • D
    DBCAA
    4× · 2022–2025 · $94k
  • DB
    DIAMOND BAR HIGH SCHOOL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $94k
  • SM
    SAN MUSAE CULTURE CENTER
    4× · 2021–2024 · $89k · revenue +115% · 39% of their budget

Funded once

  • V
    Various
    one grant, 2021 · $32k
  • DB
    Diamond Bar Chinese American Associ
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • DB
    DIAMOND BAR HIGH SCHOOL WALNUT HIGH SCHOOL WALNUT POLICE STATION DBCAA
    one grant, 2022 · $22k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Monterey Bay Chinese Association

Provide Chinese Culture and Help to Advance social, economic well-being of Chinese American at Monterey Bay, California.

Arts & Culture
2
Chinese American Womens Benevolent Association
Philanthropy
3
Chinese American Asso of West Covina

To unite the Chinese American community in promoting West Covina as a city of diversity, education, culture, art, and music. Sponsoring and creating new programs, encouraging the youth to follow our footsteps for future generations.…

Recreation & Sports
4
Uc Chinese Alumni Foundation
—
5
Chinese University Alumni Association of Southern California Center for Edu
Education
6
Japantown Cultural Society
Education
7
Central Ca Chinese Cultural Association

Raise the awareness of chinese culture, increase the understanding and appreciation the difference between the chinese and westerm cultures, and to enrich the daily life of the central valley's residents.

Community Improvement
8
Rose Pak Community Fund

To support projects affecting san francisco chinatown and chinese american community

Philanthropy
9
Joint Chinese University Alumni Association of Southern California

To promote chinese culture and community services.

—
10
Southern California Council of Chinese Schools

To promote, propagate and perpetuate chinese language and culture to assist and guide member chinese schools for their betterment to encourage cooperation and to facilitate the interchange of ideas and experiences among member chinese…

—
11
Chinese American Mutual Association

The organization's mission is to assist and support new immigrants in adapting to American life and to bridge communication gaps between different communities through educational, cultural and community programs.

Arts & Culture
12
Chinatown 808 Events

To perpetuate chinese culture in hawaii

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Taiwan Center Foundation of Greater Los Angeles; the most unlike its peers is Diamond Bar Friends of the Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
5/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DBCAA: $94,210 · OtherDBCAADIAMOND BAR HIGH SCHOOL: $93,996 · OtherDIAMOND BAR HIGH SCHOOLWALNUT HIGH SCHOOL: $84,800 · OtherWALNUT HIGH SCHOOLVarious: $32,080 · OtherVariousWVUSD: $29,898 · OtherWVUSDDiamond Bar Chinese American Associ: $24,560 · OtherDIAMOND BAR HIGH SCHOOL WALNUT HIGH SCHOOL WALNUT POLICE STATION DBCAA: $21,510 · OtherJU4Y: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · Other+14 more: $80,679 · Other+14 moreSAN MUSAE CULTURE CENTER: $88,500 · Arts & CultureSAN MUSAE CULTUR…CHINESE AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL ASSOC: $10,498 · Arts & CultureCHINESE AMERICAN…TAIWAN CENTER FOUNDATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $6,000 · Arts & CultureTAIWAN CENTER FO…+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyBRAHMA FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyCommunity Foundation of Orange: $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyPOMONA HOPE: $29,900 · EducationChinese American Parent Association of Walnut: $10,000 · EducationMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY: $20,000 · AnimalsMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionPOMONA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CENTER: $10,000 · Employment
Other$501,733Arts & Culture$106,998Philanthropy$46,000Education$39,900Animals$20,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Employment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN MUSAE CULTURE CENTER: $88,500 over 4y, 39% of budgetPOMONA HOPE: $29,900 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRAHMA FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPOMONA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetChinese American Parent Association of Walnut: $10,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetTAIWAN CENTER FOUNDATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Orange: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCHINESE MUSIC ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $2,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN MUSAE CULTURE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds POMONA HOPE ↗
  • Who funds MAUI HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREENVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds BRAHMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds POMONA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Chinese American Parent Association of Walnut ↗
  • Who funds TAIWAN CENTER FOUNDATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds Community Foundation of Orange ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE MUSIC ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds Diamond Bar Friends of The Library ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Adesso Nonprofit Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Adesso Nonprofit Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Adesso Nonprofit’s filings →

    More from the funding graph