Skip to content

· Private foundation

Adams Family Foundation II

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$294k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.3MRecreation & Sports$1.3MHealth$538kHuman Services$296kInternational$211kEducation$149kYouth Development$133kHousing & Shelter$125kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $95k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $135k
$6,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$70,000
Individual grant recipient$65,000
POSSIBILTY PLACE$20,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$15,000
WE REMEMBER YOU$10,000
SMILE TRAIN$10,000
ARCHIES PROMISE$10,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$10,000
OPERATION FINALLY HOME$10,000
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$10,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$9,000
BEESLEY ANIMAL FOUNDATI$6,500
STEWART CR HI SCH SPORT$6,000
JOURNEY HOME$5,000
GREENHOUSE MINISTRY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $288k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 10% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GREENHOUSE MINISTRIES: $50k → 9%ARCHIES PROMISE: $36k → 9%HOPE FOR JUSTICE: $30k → 14%GREENHOUSE MINISTRIES: $25k → 9%ARCHIES PROMISE: $17k → 9%ARCHIES PROMISE: $10k → 9%GREENHOUSE MINISTRIES: $10k → 9%ARCHIES PROMISE: $10k → 9%ARCHIES PROMISE: $5k → 9%ARCHIES PROMISE: $5k → 9%BARNABAS VISION: $20k → 9%BARNABAS VISION: $15k → 9%BARNABAS VISION: $15k → 9%BARNABAS VISION: $10k → 9%WE REMEMBER YOU: $10k → 9%BARNABAS VISION: $10k → 9%BARNABAS VISION: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
NJ
CA
CO
MD
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 39 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

39 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
57

Total granted

$3.6M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+57%

Still filing today

36%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $138k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalAnimalsYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BARNABAS VISION INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +257%
  • JH
    JOURNEY HOME INC
    5× · 2017–2025 · $71k · revenue +170%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $60k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • MT
    MID TENN CHRISTIAN SCHO
    one grant, 2020 · $157k
  • MT
    MD TN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $124k
  • SC
    SHILOH CAMP
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rahab House

Rahab House is deeply committed to the rescue, refuge, and restoration of human trafficking survivors. We provide comprehensive support that encompasses immediate safety and connections to long-term restorative care in alignment with the…

Human Services
2
Homes of Love Inc

Establishes and maintains small, permanent, family structured homes for orphaned and at-risk children in cambodia, vietnam, and zimbabwe. homes of love, inc. is committed to providing long-term care to these children emotionally,…

Housing & Shelter
3
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

Barrow County Habitat for Humanity is part of a global, nonprofit housing organization operated on Christian principles that seeks to put Gods love into action by building homes, communities and hope.

—
4
Hopehouse International Inc

Hopehouse international provides aid and housing to families adopting orphans in ukraine and adjacent european countries.

International
5
Misfit Mission

Misfits Mission purpose is to lead women to restoration in Christ through transitional living and godly counsel of Christian leaders.

Health
6
His Helping Hands Ministries

Provide safe housing and training to women who were victims of addiction,sex trafficking, abuse, homelesness or previously incarcerated.

Religion
7
Welcome House Knoxville

Our Mission at Welcome House Knoxville is to share the love of Jesus through the ministries of hospitality and friendship. We provide safe and loving homes for individuals and families in transition to permanent housing.

Housing & Shelter
8
Home International Inc

To build and support orphanages in foreign counties in order to assist needy children to have housing, clothihg, and food to eat.

International
9
Habitat for Humanity Williamson -Maury

Habitat for humanity of williamson-maury (hfhwm) seeks to put god's love into action by partnering with communites to build affordable housing, inspiring hope and life-changing stability for families through homeownership.

—
10
Love's Arm Outreach Ministries Inc

To engage in transformative christ-centered relatonships with persons in addiction-related prostitution.

Philanthropy
11
Friends House Ministries Inc

To assist former prisoners to transition into society successully

Housing & Shelter
12
Refuge for Women Inc

Refuge for women inc is a faith-based organization that provides housing, counseling, and life and work skills training for women who have escaped human trafficking or sexual exploitation.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Journey Home Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mary's Meals Usa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
12/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MTSU ATHLETIC ASSOC: $1,126,000 · OtherMTSU ATHLETIC ASSOCMIDDLE TN CHRISTIAN SCH: $247,895 · OtherMIDDLE TN CHRISTIAN SCHWORLD OUTREACH CHURCH OF MURFREESBORO TN INC: $235,000 · OtherWORLD OUTREACH CHURCH OF MURFREESBORO TN INCMID TENN CHRISTIAN SCHO: $157,245 · Other+87 more: $2,236,757 · Other+87 moreSPECIAL KIDS INC: $367,500 · Health+2 more: $12,500 · HealthGREENHOUSE MINISTRIES: $85,000 · Human ServicesARCHIES PROMISE: $83,000 · Human ServicesTHE BARNABAS VISION INC: $80,475 · Human ServicesHope for Justice Inc: $30,000 · Human ServicesPOSSIBILITY PLACE: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesMary's Meals USA Inc: $60,000 · International+1 more: $1,000 · InternationalJESSE C BEESLEY ANIMAL HUMANE FOUNDATION INC: $28,500 · AnimalsSIXTEEN HANDS HORSE SANCTUARY INC: $4,000 · AnimalsBLUE MONARCH: $30,000 · EmploymentSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $20,000 · Religion
Other$4,002,897Health$380,000Human Services$308,475International$61,000Animals$32,500Employment$30,000Religion$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPECIAL KIDS INC: $367,500 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetGREENHOUSE MINISTRIES: $85,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetARCHIES PROMISE: $83,000 over 6y, 30% of budgetTHE BARNABAS VISION INC: $80,475 over 6y, 12% of budgetJOURNEY HOME INC: $71,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $60,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMary's Meals USA Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBLUE MONARCH: $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHope for Justice Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetJESSE C BEESLEY ANIMAL HUMANE FOUNDATION INC: $28,500 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOSSIBILITY PLACE: $20,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetHabitat for Humanity: $19,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetWE REMEMBER YOU INC: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetPORTICO INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOPERATION FINALLY HOME: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 560 MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOORS OF HOPE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSIXTEEN HANDS HORSE SANCTUARY INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTELLURIDE AIDS BENEFIT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF TENNIS INC: $2,200 over 2y, 16% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPECIAL KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENHOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds ARCHIES PROMISE ↗
  • Who funds THE BARNABAS VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEY HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Mary's Meals USA Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLUE MONARCH ↗
  • Who funds Hope for Justice Inc ↗
  • Who funds JESSE C BEESLEY ANIMAL HUMANE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christy-Houston Foundation IncTN26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christy-Houston Foundation Inc · Adams Family Foundation I · John D Floyd Charitable Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Charity Circle of Murfreesboro · Burgess Family Charitable · Jennings & Rebecca Jones Foundation Inc · Nashville Predators Foundation · Laroche Family Foundation · The Richard Siegel Foundation · The Sixteen Foundation · Saint Thomas Rutherford Hospital

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Adams Family Foundation II funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Adams Family Foundation II. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Adams Family Foundation II?

    Find your warmest path to Adams Family Foundation II through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 106 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Adams Family Foundation II’s filings →

    More from the funding graph