Skip to content

· Private foundation

Adams Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
43
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$7.2MHousing & Shelter$5.0MInternational$3.3MHuman Services$1.4MHealth$1.1MArts & Culture$665kEducation$543kEnvironment$425kOther$0
02FY2024 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $375k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.0M
$50,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$58M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COVENANT HOUSE$500,000
VINCENTIAN SOLIDARITY OFFICE$290,000
CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD$253,000
UJA-FEDERATION OF NEW YORK$200,000
MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER$185,000
GRACE CENTER FOUNDATION$150,000
THE ALFRED E SMITH MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$150,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$100,000
OUR LADY OF VICTORY HOMES OF CHARITY$100,000
THE BOWERY MISSION$100,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$100,000
THE CARDINAL'S ANNUAL STEWARDSHIP APPEAL$100,000
DOMINICAN MISSIONS SECRETARIAT (BISHOP CHRIS)$100,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$100,000
FRANCISCAN FRIARS OF THE ATONEMENT$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOYS TOWN: $150k → 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII: $10k → 9%CARDINAL HAYES HOME FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 9%GOOD COUNSEL: $25k → 14%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $25k → 15%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $25k → 26%BOYS TOWN: $100k → 12%CARDINAL HAYES HOME FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 9%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $25k → 26%BOYS TOWN: $75k → 12%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $25k → 26%BOYS TOWN: $50k → 12%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $10k → 26%BOYS TOWN: $50k → 12%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $10k → 26%BOYS TOWN: $50k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $25k → 12%BOYS TOWN: $25k → 12%COVENANT HOUSE: $705k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $605k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $600k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $505k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $500k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $500k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $300k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $200k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
NE
MO
KY
VA
TN
NC
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Adams Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 3% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 0%.

Adams Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18M · 50 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

50 repeat relationships: 30 still active in FY2024, 20 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

50
23

Total granted

$18M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
0%

Still filing today

50%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $730k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsReligionHealthInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.9M · revenue +34%
  • FF
    Father Flanagan's Boys' Home
    8× · 2017–2024 · $525k · revenue +40%
  • CH
    Christian Herald Association Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $485k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • CO
    CONGREGATION OF THE MISSION MIDWEST PROVINCE
    one grant, 2022 · $300k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $150k
  • NY
    New York City Rescue Mission
    one grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue -93%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
2
Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christs healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
3
St Catherine of Siena Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
4
Good Shepherd Hospice

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
5
Mercy Medical Center Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities

—
6
St Francis Hospital

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
7
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
8
Saint Peter's University Hospital

Keeping faith with the teachings of the roman catholic church and guided by the bishop of metuchen, saint peter's university hospital is committed to humble service to humanity, especially the poor, through competence and good stewardship…

Health
9
Nursing Sisters Home Care Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
10
St Charles Hospital Corp

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
11
The Animal Medical Center

Dedicated to providing compassionate and collaborative care to animals and to leading the advancement of veterinary medicine through innovative clinical research and education.

Animals
12
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Humane Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
26/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY CROSS FAMILY MINISTRIES: $2,260,000 · OtherHOLY CROSS FAMILY MINISTRIESVINCENTIAN INTERNATIONAL MISSION SERVICES: $1,410,000 · OtherVINCENTIAN INTERNATIONAL MISSION SERVICESCONGREGATION OF THE MISSION (FR TOMAZ): $917,000 · OtherCONGREGATION OF THE MISSION (FR TOMAZ)FRANCISCAN FRIARS OF THE ATONEMENT: $850,000 · OtherFRANCISCAN FRIARS OF THE ATONEMENTOUR LADY OF VICTORY HOMES OF CHARITY INC: $770,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF VICTORY HOMES OF CHARITY INCTHE ALFRED E SMITH MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $544,500 · Other+58 more: $4,957,500 · Other+58 moreCOVENANT HOUSE: $3,915,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSEFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $525,000 · Human ServicesFather Flanagan's Boys' H…+4 more: $175,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $1,070,500 · InternationalCATHOLIC M…GRACE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $485,000 · InternationalGRACE CENT…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $275,000 · InternationalMEDECINS S…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $400,000 · HealthMAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER: $241,000 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $150,000 · HealthPROJECT ALS INC: $125,000 · HealthChristian Herald Association Inc: $485,000 · ReligionETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $175,000 · ReligionPADRE PIO FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $60,000 · ReligionAve Maria Communications: $50,000 · ReligionSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $193,000 · EducationCHRISTENDOM EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION: $150,000 · EducationSAN MIGUEL ACADEMY OF NEWBURGH: $50,000 · EducationUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $210,000 · PhilanthropyDAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS -BASED EDUCATION AND WORLD PEACE: $32,500 · Philanthropy
Other$11,709,000Human Services$4,615,000International$1,830,500Health$916,000Religion$770,000Education$393,000Philanthropy$242,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $3,915,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $1,070,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $525,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Herald Association Inc: $485,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetGRACE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $485,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $400,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $275,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER: $241,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $210,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $193,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC: $175,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities New York Metro Inc: $175,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetSEVERAL SOURCES SHELTERS INC: $150,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetCHRISTENDOM EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION: $150,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNew York City Rescue Mission: $150,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ALS INC: $125,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $120,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Haven Inc: $100,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $90,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCARDINAL NEWMAN SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF CATHOLIC HGR ED: $75,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetPADRE PIO FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSAN MIGUEL ACADEMY OF NEWBURGH: $50,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS -BASED EDUCATION AND WORLD PEACE: $32,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetANIMAL DEFENSE LEAGUE OF TEXAS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGOOD COUNSEL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCARDINAL HAYES HOME FOR CHILDREN: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES HAWAII: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds Christian Herald Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds GRACE CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities New York Metro Inc ↗
  • Who funds SEVERAL SOURCES SHELTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTENDOM EDUCATIONAL CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds New York City Rescue Mission ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ALS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Haven Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ge Aerospace FoundationCT13.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · Somos Healthcare Providers Inc · The Salem Foundation · Knights of Columbus · Koch Foundation Inc · Knights of Columbus Charitable Fund Inc · Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Express Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Adams Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Adams Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Adams Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Adams Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Adams Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph