Loading…
· Public charity
ACS OF PUERTO RICO INC
Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.
$1.0M
Granted FY2024
2
Grants
2
Communities
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Health$1.2MInternational$12kOther$64k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
health
2019
—
2020
—
2021
supplemental environmentalenvironmental healthhealth medicallymedically underservedambulatory supplementalcomprehensiveprimary care
2022
—
2023
—
2024
—
2025
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 2 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
- American Cancer Society Inc$50,000
- Liga Puertorriquena Contra el Cancer De PR$20,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8% — the area typically sits at 8%. 5% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 3 repeat orgs$98k to everyone else
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
3
7
Total granted
$1.2M
$98k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+6%
+130%
Still filing today
67%
86%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
HealthInternationalOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACAmerican Cancer Society Inc2× · 2022–2024 · $1.1M · revenue -8%
- LPLiga Puertorriquena Contra el Cancer De PR8× · 2017–2024 · $140k · revenue +6%
- SPServicios Preventivos de Salud2× · 2022–2023 · $25k
Funded once
- AMAtlantic Medical Centergraduatedone grant, 2021 · $16k · revenue +134%
- CSCorporacion Sanos Incgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $16k · revenue +297%
- CSCosta Salud CMTY Hlth CTR Incgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $16k · revenue +130%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Centro De Salud De Lares Inc
Centro de Salud de Lares, Inc., is a non-profit corporation who operates a comprehensive primary care program which provide medical services to low income families and medically underserved indigent populations in the municipalities of…
Health
2
Centro De Servicios Primarios De Sa Lud Inc
Centro de Servicios Primarios de Salud, Inc. (the Center) is a nonprofit corporation incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The Center is organized as Federally Qualified Health Center and operate under section 330…
—
3
Med Centro Inc
To provide primary health care services, specially to low income individuals and families, including agricultural workers in the Municipalities of Ponce, Peñuelas, Juana Diaz, Villalba and other adjacent areas.
—
4
Cossma Inc
To provide primary health care services to medically undeserved population, agricultural, migrant and seasonal farm workers as to their dependents.
Health
5
Morovis Community Health Center Inc
Public health services to provide primary ambulatory supplemental and environmental health services to medically underserved residents near to Municipalities of Morovis, Toa Baja and Vega Alta, Puerto Rico.
Health
6
Corp Serv Med Prim Y Prev De Hatillo
The Organization operates a comprehensive primary care program, which provide services to low-income families and medically underserved indigent population in the Municipality of Hatillo, Puerto Rico.
—
7
Concilio De Salud Integral De Loiza Inc
Community Health Center that provides primary ambulatory and supplemental health services to the medically under-served residents in the Municipalities of Loiza, Rio Grande, Luquillo and Ceiba, Puerto Rico.
—
8
Asociacion De Salud Primaria De Puerto Rico Inc
To serve as a liaison, representation, and support to the 330 primary care centers in Puerto Rico in achieving their goals of access to quality primary and preventive health services.
—
9
Centro De Servicios Primarios De Salud De Patillas Inc
To provide primary ambulatory, supplemental and environmental health services to the medically undeserved residents around the Municipalities of Patillas, Maunabo, Salinas and Santa Isabel, Puerto Rico.
—
10
Asociacion De Hospitales De Puerto Rico
An association committed to represent health care institutions and associates and to ensure the quality of the services offered
Health
11
Corporacion De Servicios De Salud Y Desarrollo Socioeconomico El Otoao
Primary health services center
Health
12
Puerto Rico College of Physicians and
The organization (PRCPS) was created by Act 77 of 1994 to promote the professional improvement of its members, implement community service programs and contribute to the advancement of medicine and public health of Puerto Rico, including…
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Costa Salud Community Health Centers Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Cancer Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$1,238,000Other$63,500International$11,900
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Direct ReliefCA19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Direct Relief · Asociacion de Salud Primaria de Puerto Rico Inc · Puerto Rico Community Foundation Inc · Hispanic Federation Inc · Americares Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ACS OF PUERTO RICO INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: American Cancer Society Inc.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~2 months of operating runway; revenue held over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 131788491 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on American Cancer Society Inc, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 2 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 0% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Acs of Puerto Rico Inc?
Find your warmest path to Acs of Puerto Rico Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines