Skip to content

· Public charity

AcruxKC

To provide short-term help for medical needs to promote health equity for individuals with low incomes, health-related grants to selected organizations, nursing scholarships, and access to medical education.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$2.1MEducation$875kHuman Services$56kInternational$27kRecreation & Sports$24kPhilanthropy$5k
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $403,475, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,041,950 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,638,475 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $222k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$14,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$64M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Vibrant Health$150,000
Kansas City Kansas Public Schools$26,000
Kansas City Missouri Public Schools$25,000
Shawnee Mission School District$25,000
Independence School District$25,000
Olathe School District$18,000
Turner USD 202$15,000
Raytown School District$14,000
Belton School District #124$14,000
Fort Osage R-1 School District$14,000
Hickman Mills School District$13,500
North Kansas City Schools$12,000
Center School District #58$10,250
Lee's Summit CARES$10,000
Frontier Schools$9,475
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Good Samaritan Center: $651 → 8%YMCA of Greater Kansas City: $27k → 15%El Centro: $5k → 16%Kansas City Hospice & Palliative Care: $10k → 15%Bishop Sullivan Center: $3k → 15%Academie Lafayette: $612 → 15%Metro Lutheran Ministries: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 26 repeat orgs$395k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
13

Total granted

$2.7M
$206k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
0%

Still filing today

54%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $189k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The Children's Mercy Hospital
    4× · 2017–2021 · $375k · revenue +67%
  • SU
    SAMUEL U RODGERS HEALTH CENTER INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $181k · revenue +57%
  • SC
    Seton Center Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $63k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • HP
    HEALTH PARTNERSHIP CLINIC INC
    one grant, 2023 · $85k · revenue -3%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY
    one grant, 2017 · $27k · revenue -11%
  • LS
    LEE'S SUMMIT R7 SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2017 · $22k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
2
University Health Physicians

University health physicians provides quality and compassionate healthcare in an environment of academic excellence.

Health
3
Healthcore Clinic Inc

The mission of healthcore clinic, inc is to provide quality family healthcare through improved access and a heightened and unrelenting focus on education and prevention.

Health
4
Regional Health Care Clinic Inc

Quality care + meaningful partnerships = healthy communities

Health
5
Kansas Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.

Health
6
Physicians Clinic Inc

Methodist physicians clinic provides accessible, quality medical care through its integrated team of health professionals, including specialists in family medicine, internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, surgery,…

Health
7
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
8
Heartland Medical Clinic Inc

Heartland offers high-quality, affordable, behavior ally-enhanced primary care to all community members regardless of income or insurance status. heartland is dedicated to practicing holistic, integrated health care in a model that focuses…

Health
9
Citizens Medical Center Inc

Enhancing the lives of those we serve.

—
10
Hunter Health Clinic

Hunter health (the center) operates three healthcare centers in wichita, ks. the center provides a broad range of health services to a largely medically underserved population. the us dept. of health and human services (dhhs) and indian…

—
11
Community Health Center of Se Kansas Inc

To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.

Health
12
Burnett Medical Center Inc

The mission of burnett medical center is to provide compassionate, comprehensive, community healthcare that exceeds our customer's expectations. our mission, as well as our vision and values, serves as a guideline for daily decision making…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas City Care Clinic; the most unlike its peers is Bishop Sullivan Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
16/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KANSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $215,200 · OtherKANSAS CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLSINDEPENDENCE 30 SCHOOL DISTRICT: $205,291 · OtherINDEPENDENCE 30 SCHOOL DISTRICTUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 500 KANSAS CITY KS PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $177,700 · OtherUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 500 KANSAS CITY KS PUBLIC SCHOOLSNORTH KANSAS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $175,736 · OtherNORTH KANSAS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICTShawnee Mission School District: $172,575 · OtherShawnee Mission School DistrictUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 233: $141,150 · OtherUNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 233USD 202 TURNER SCHOOL DISTRICT: $121,900 · OtherUSD 202 TURNER SCHOOL DISTRICTRAYTOWN C-2 PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT: $114,643 · OtherRAYTOWN C-2 PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTCENTER SCHOOL DISTRICT #58 AND #59: $104,750 · OtherCENTER SCHOOL DISTRICT #58 AND #59HICKMAN MILLS C-1SCHOOL DISTRICT: $102,000 · OtherHICKMAN MILLS C-1SCHOOL DISTRICTGRANDVIEW C-4 SCHOOL DISTRICT: $73,635 · OtherFort Osage R-1 School District: $65,900 · OtherSeton Center Inc: $62,770 · OtherKansas City CARE Clinic: $62,598 · Other+6 more: $66,064 · OtherThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $375,000 · HealthThe Children's Mercy HospitalSAMUEL U RODGERS HEALTH CENTER INC: $180,992 · HealthSAMUEL U RODGERS HEALTH CENTER INCTURNER HOUSE CLINIC INC: $150,000 · HealthTURNER HOUSE CLINIC INCARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $120,998 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INCHEALTH PARTNERSHIP CLINIC INC: $85,000 · HealthHEALTH PARTNERSHIP CLINIC INCSWOPE HEALTH SERVICES: $52,075 · HealthTRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $46,025 · Health+5 more: $65,137 · Health+5 moreINSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE: $34,245 · EducationFRONTIER SCHOOLS INC: $13,689 · EducationGUADALUPE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM INC: $12,100 · EducationUNIVERSITY ACADEMY: $9,000 · EducationBSDS INC BROOKSIDE CHARTER SCHOOL: $7,182 · EducationThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $6,250 · EducationYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $27,410 · Human ServicesKansas City Hospice Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesBishop Sullivan Center Inc: $9,860 · Human Services+1 more: $612 · Human ServicesVISITING NURSES FOUNDATION: $8,100 · PhilanthropyTHE WELLNESS CENTER INC: $7,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,861,912Health$1,075,227Education$82,466Human Services$47,882Philanthropy$8,100Recreation & Sports$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $375,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAMUEL U RODGERS HEALTH CENTER INC: $180,992 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $120,998 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH PARTNERSHIP CLINIC INC: $85,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSeton Center Inc: $62,770 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetKansas City CARE Clinic: $62,598 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSWOPE HEALTH SERVICES: $52,075 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $46,025 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE: $34,245 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $27,410 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE FAMILY CARE CENTER LLC: $22,837 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetRACHEL HOUSE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTERS INC: $19,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFRONTIER SCHOOLS INC: $13,689 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGUADALUPE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM INC: $12,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKansas City Hospice Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBishop Sullivan Center Inc: $9,860 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY ACADEMY: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPALESTINE SENIOR CITIZENS ACTIVITY CENTER INC: $9,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMISSION OF HOPE CLINIC: $8,368 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetVISITING NURSES FOUNDATION: $8,100 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBSDS INC BROOKSIDE CHARTER SCHOOL: $7,182 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WELLNESS CENTER INC: $7,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association: $6,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVNA CORPORATION: $5,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACADEMIE LAFAYETTE: $612 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Children's Mercy Hospital ↗
  • Who funds SAMUEL U RODGERS HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNER HOUSE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH PARTNERSHIP CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds Seton Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Kansas City CARE Clinic ↗
  • Who funds SWOPE HEALTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds TRUMAN MEDICAL CENTER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FAMILY CARE CENTER LLC ↗
  • Who funds RACHEL HOUSE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds FRONTIER SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds GUADALUPE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM INC ↗
  • Who funds LEE'S SUMMIT CARES ↗
  • Who funds Kansas City Hospice Inc ↗
  • Who funds Bishop Sullivan Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds PALESTINE SENIOR CITIZENS ACTIVITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION OF HOPE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds VISITING NURSES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BSDS INC BROOKSIDE CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE WELLNESS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Kansas City IncMO47.5× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Health Forward Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · Jackson County Community Children's Services Fund · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation · Giving the Basics Inc · Heart to Heart International Inc · School Smart Kc Inc · Truman Heartland Community Foundation · Lena H Green Trust · The Reach Healthcare Foundation · Oppenstein Brothers Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization AcruxKC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from AcruxKC. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to AcruxKC?

    Find your warmest path to AcruxKC through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on AcruxKC’s filings →

    More from the funding graph