· Public charity
Acm Lifting Lives
ACM LIFTING LIVES music dedicated to improving lives through the power of music.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $55k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $177k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $397k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE | $182,050 |
| PORTER'S CALL | $90,000 |
| VUMC DEVELOPMENT | $75,000 |
| MOMENTOUS INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
| HOPE DESK | $32,000 |
| TOURING CAREER WORKSHOP | $25,000 |
| ABE'S GARDEN | $20,491 |
| CARE DIMENSIONS | $10,000 |
| IRIS COLLECTIVE | $10,000 |
| COUNTRY MUSIC FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| TEXAS SUPREMACY OF MUSIC ARTS CONS | $10,000 |
| WEST FALL CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $10,000 |
| NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOC | $10,000 |
| MULTICARE HEALTH FOUNDATIONS | $10,000 |
| CHILDREN'S EYE FOUNDATION OF AAPOS | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $257k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 38% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +120% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $234k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VUVanderbilt University Medical Center8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +120%
- MHMUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE INC7× · 2017–2024 · $699k · revenue +228%
- RSRYAN SEACREST FOUNDATION INC6× · 2017–2023 · $500k · revenue +231%
Funded once
- SGSUSAN G KOMEN FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $25k
- TSThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +47%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To welcome all to our music and arts community to learn, create, celebrate and heal.
Hear Your Song empowers children and teens living with serious illnesses and complex health needs to make their voices heard through collaborative songwriting. At the heart of our work is a "kid-driven," totally individualized process that…
The music institute of chicago ("music institute") leads people toward a lifelong engagement with music, by providing widely accessible resources for high quality music teaching, performing, and service activities.
Soundexchange is the premier music tech organization on a mission to power the (see schedule o)
Community music center of boston ("cmcb") transforms lives throughout greater boston by providing equitable access to excellent music education and arts experiences.
To advocate for and support living composers
Its mission is to bring joy and comfort, laughter and healing to children and young adults who are chronically or terminally ill. it does so through personalized songs that honor the child. its motto is: the medicine of music.
To develop a viable music industry in memphis for the future by providing a structured learning environment to enrich and equip our talents with proven tools to build the next generation of successful music professionals. the consortium…
To be north carolina's state orchestra, an orchestra achieving the highest level of artistic quality and performance standards, and embracing its dual legacies of statewide service and music education.
Settlement music school's mission is to provide the highest quality instruction in music and the related arts to children and adults, without regard to age, race or financial circumstances. settlement's broad range of programs, taught by…
See schedule oyoung musicians of talent need support. left alone with their gift,without the instruction and mentoring that allows them to thrive, eventhe most exceptional young artists will struggle, and many may fail toachieve their full…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Abilities First Inc and the most unlike its peers is Brett Eldredge Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center ↗
- Who funds MUSIC HEALTH ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds RYAN SEACREST FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PORTERS CALL ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds CANDID ↗
- Who funds VENTURA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Momentous Institute ↗
- Who funds OPERATION SONG INC ↗
- Who funds Touring Career Workshop ↗
- Who funds Songs for Sound Inc ↗
- Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds PROJECT CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds MUSICIANS ON CALL INC ↗
- Who funds ABE'S GARDEN ↗
- Who funds CREATIVETS ↗
- Who funds Notes For Notes Inc ↗
- Who funds BAREFOOT REPUBLIC INC ↗
- Who funds COUNTRY MUSIC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAVE THE MUSIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WO SMITH NASHVILLE COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds SONGWRITINGWITHINC ↗
- Who funds GRAMMY MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MUSIC FOR SENIORS ↗
- Who funds WEST FALLS CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds P E R C INC ↗
- Who funds PERSONAL COUNSELING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Project Miracle ↗
- Who funds Resounding Joy Inc ↗
- Who funds Children's Eye Foundation The Foundation Of AAPOS ↗
- Who funds IRIS ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds MAGNOLIA MEMORY CARE INC ↗
- Who funds CROWLEY ROTARY OUTREACH FORMERLY-COMMUNITY OUTREACH CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PAISLEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · The Cma Foundation · Gibson Gives Foundation Dba Gibson Gives · Memorial Foundation Inc · Les Paul Foundation · Nashville Predators Foundation · Hca Healthcare Foundation · The Frist Foundation · D'Addario Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Acm Lifting Lives funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Key Program Incorporated — 86% of income from government
- Care Dimensions Inc — 14% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.