Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Accion Politica Pcunista Dba Pcun

To promote civic participation.

$97k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Community Improvement$324kPublic Benefit$317kCivil Rights$207kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kHuman Services$30kCrime & Legal$26kHousing & Shelter$23k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $77,805 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $96,607 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $18,802 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$908k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MANO A MANO FAMILY CENTER$60,735
SALEM-KEIZER COALITION FOR EQUALITY$10,000
OREGON WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PAC$7,070
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PORTLAND AFRICAN-AMERICAN LEADERSHIP FORUM: $14k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 19% of Accion Politica Pcunista Dba Pcun’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 84% of the giving stays in OR; read by stated purpose it is 99% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Accion Politica Pcunista Dba Pcunlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$691k · 6 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$691k
$119k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
0%

Still filing today

100%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureCrime & LegalHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    FAMILY FORWARD ACTION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $184k · revenue +190% · 31% of their budget
  • A
    APANO
    2× · 2020–2021 · $140k · revenue +53%
  • IB
    IMAGINE BLACK
    2× · 2020–2021 · $126k · revenue +257% · 33% of their budget

Funded once

  • CO
    COMMUNITIES OF COLOR FOR A JUST OREGON
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • NE
    Northwest Employment Education and Defense Fund
    one grant, 2024 · $26k · revenue 0%
  • FH
    FARMWORKER HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $23k · revenue -14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pueblo Unido Pdx

Connect immigrants to legal, social, and interpretation services.

Human Services
2
New Progressive Network

Next up amplifies the voice of diverse youth to achieve a more just oregon

Civil Rights
3
Oregon Progress Forum

Next up amplifies the voice and leadership of diverse young people to achieve a more just and equitable oregon.

Environment
4
Family Forward Oregon

We work collectively to educate and advocate for systems that elevate the vital work of care and caregiving in its many forms within our community.

Human Services
5
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
6
Our Oregon

Promote economic and social fairness by working in coalition open a broad range of issues and activities in the public arena

Human Services
7
Causa of Oregon

Causa works to improve the lives of latino immigrants and their families through advocacy, leadership development, civic engagement and coalition building. latino immirgants and their families are the heart of causa and inspire, implement…

8
Rainier Beach Cummunity Empowerment Coalition

Rainier Beach Action Coalition is a grassroot, Black-led organization devoted to locally driven development. It promotes quality education, living wage jobs, affordable transportation and housing, and building community capacity in…

Community Improvement
9
Working Washington

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

10
Oregonians in Action

Land Use Issues

Environment
11
Latino Network Action Fund

Latino network action fund seeks to create a more representative democracy in oregon.

Community Improvement
12
Fair Housing Council of Oregon

FHCO is a statewide civil rights organization whose mission is to end illegal housing discrimination and promote equal access to housing choice through education and enforcement of fair housing law.

Unclassified

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Imagine Black Futures and the most unlike its peers is Unite Oregon Action. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITE OREGON ACTION — $110,673 · OtherUNITE OREGON ACTIONMano A Mano — $101,195 · OtherMano A ManoCOMMUNITIES OF COLOR FOR A JUST OREGON — $29,500 · OtherCOMMUNITIES OF COLOR FOR A JUST ORE…CAPACES LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE — $10,500 · OtherBIONAUTS CHILDCARE — $10,000 · OtherIMAGINE BLACK FUTURES — $14,427 · OtherSALEMKEIZER COALITION FOR EQUALITY — $10,000 · Other+2 more — $13,070 · OtherFAMILY FORWARD ACTION — $183,764 · Community ImprovementFAMILY FORWARD ACTIONIMAGINE BLACK — $125,673 · Civil RightsIMAGINE BLACKCENTER FOR INTERCULTURAL ORGANIZING — $29,327 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR INTERCU…APANO — $140,100 · Arts & CultureAPANOTIDES FOUNDATION — $140,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATIONNorthwest Employment Education and Defense Fund — $26,000 · Crime & LegalFARMWORKER HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $22,987 · Housing & Shelter
Other$299,365Community Improvement$183,764Civil Rights$155,000Arts & Culture$140,100Philanthropy$140,000Crime & Legal$26,000Housing & Shelter$22,987

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFAMILY FORWARD ACTION — $183,764 over 2y, 31% of budgetAPANO — $140,100 over 2y, 21% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $140,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIMAGINE BLACK — $125,673 over 2y, 33% of budgetUNITE OREGON ACTION — $110,673 over 2y, 17% of budgetMano A Mano — $101,195 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetCENTER FOR INTERCULTURAL ORGANIZING — $29,327 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNorthwest Employment Education and Defense Fund — $26,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFARMWORKER HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $22,987 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetIMAGINE BLACK FUTURES — $14,427 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSALEMKEIZER COALITION FOR EQUALITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seeding JusticeOR24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seeding Justice · Northwest Health Foundation Fund II · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Oregon Community Foundation · Portland Regional Educational Telecommunications Corporation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Service Employees International Union · Social Justice Fund Northwest · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Accion Politica Pcunista Dba Pcun funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 28%
  • Salemkeizer Coalition for Equality77% of income from government
  • Center for Intercultural Organizing28% of income from government
  • Farmworker Housing Development Corporation7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Accion Politica Pcunista Dba Pcun?

Find your warmest path to Accion Politica Pcunista Dba Pcun through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph