Skip to content

· Private foundation

Abrams Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$264k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$378kInternational$309kHuman Services$199kPhilanthropy$141kRecreation & Sports$131kReligion$124kCivil Rights$107kArts & Culture$102kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k20 grants · $76k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $129k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$7,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ABRAMS HEBREW ACADEMY$60,000
JCC ASSN-ABRAMS CAMPS$43,500
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$30,000
CONGREGATION BROTHERS OF ISRAEL$12,875
JEWISH FEDERATION OF PRINCETON$12,500
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN D ADOM$10,000
AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUC FOUNDATION$10,000
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
STAND WITH US$8,000
GREENWOOD HOUSE$7,500
FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENCE FORCES$7,000
ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CTR FOR THE BLIND$7,000
FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH$7,000
CENTRAL FUND OF ISRAEL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CTR FOR THE BLIND: $7k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CTR FOR THE BLIND: $7k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CTR FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CTR FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CTR FOR THE BLIND: $5k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CTR FOR THE BLIND: $4k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CTR FOR THE BLIND: $4k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CTR FOR THE BLIND: $3k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 37 repeat orgs$90k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +62% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
20

Total granted

$1.5M
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
0%

Still filing today

49%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalCivil RightsFood & NutritionArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ABRAMS HEBREW ACADEMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $378k · revenue +59%
  • GREENWOOD HOUSE HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED
    9× · 2017–2025 · $66k · revenue +26%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $41k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF PMB
    one grant, 2017 · $19k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY CHILDRENS SERV
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
4
The Jerusalem Connection
—
5
Hand in Hand American Friends of the Center for Jewish-Arab Education in Isra

To promote partnership and coexistence among jewish and arab citizens of israel by providing support for integrated schools and providing funding for and assisting in program development in connection with israeli nonprofits with similar…

International
6
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
7
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
8
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
9
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
10
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
11
The Jewish Agency - American Section Inc

The jewish agency-american section, inc. (jaas) was organized to work with and in support of non profit organizations active in the fields of immigration and absorption in israel; youth care and training; teaching of hebrew and jewish…

Human Services
12
Boundless Israel Inc

The organization is a think-action tank partnering with community leaders to revitalize israel education and take bold collective action to combat jew-hatred.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Israel Education Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Task Inc Trenton Area Soup Kitchen Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
17/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JCC ASSN-ABRAMS CAMPS: $130,500 · OtherJCC ASSN-ABRAMS CAMPSJEWISH FEDERATION OF PRINCETON: $111,500 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF PRINCETONAMERICAN RED MAGEN DAVID: $86,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED MAGEN DAVIDJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICE: $80,500 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICEAMERICAN FRIENDS MAGEN DAVID: $76,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS MAGEN DAVIDFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENCE FORCES: $58,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DEFENCE FORCESSTAND WITH US: $55,500 · OtherSTAND WITH USCONGREGATION BROTHERS OF ISRAEL: $34,075 · Other+38 more: $231,050 · Other+38 moreABRAMS HEBREW ACADEMY: $378,000 · ReligionABRAMS HEBREW ACADEMYJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $106,500 · InternationalJEWISH NATION…AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · InternationalAMERICAN ISRA…FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC: $40,500 · InternationalFRIENDS OF IS…Central Fund of Israel: $7,000 · InternationalGREENWOOD HOUSE HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED: $66,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $38,500 · Health+2 more: $1,000 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $38,000 · PhilanthropySUNSHINE FOUNDATION: $4,000 · PhilanthropyISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $40,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $22,500 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $2,000 · Civil Rights
Other$863,125Religion$378,000International$204,000Health$105,500Philanthropy$42,000Human Services$40,000Civil Rights$24,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetABRAMS HEBREW ACADEMY: $378,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $106,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWOOD HOUSE HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED: $66,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC: $40,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $40,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $38,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC: $38,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $22,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTASK Inc Trenton Area Soup Kitchen Inc: $14,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $11,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNY COMMUNITY FRIDGE CORP: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEFRONT INC: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRutgers Hillel Corporation: $4,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSUNSHINE FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKIDSBRIDGE INC: $2,600 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMANSPACE INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PARKINSON ALLIANCE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ABRAMS HEBREW ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWOOD HOUSE HOME FOR THE JEWISH AGED ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ISRAEL DISABLED VETERANS INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEKET ISRAEL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds TASK Inc Trenton Area Soup Kitchen Inc ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds NY COMMUNITY FRIDGE CORP ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds HOMEFRONT INC ↗
  • Who funds Rutgers Hillel Corporation ↗
  • Who funds SUNSHINE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Gerald Freedman Charitable Foundation IncNJ13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Gerald Freedman Charitable Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Mercer Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · American Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Abrams Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Abrams Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 47%
  • Womanspace Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Homefront Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Abrams’ filings →

More from the funding graph