· Private foundation
Abraham Burtman Charity Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KREMPELS BRAIN INJURY CENTER | $2,600 |
| ARTS IN REACH | $2,500 |
| SEACOAST COMMUNITY SCHOOL | $2,500 |
| NEW DURHAM HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP | $2,000 |
| FARMINGTON 500 BOYS & GIRLS CLUB | $2,000 |
| NUTE HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $2,000 |
| THE KINGSWOOD YOUTH CENTER | $2,000 |
| FARMINGTON HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP | $2,000 |
| NEW DURHAM FOOD PANTRY | $1,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY | $1,500 |
| LYDIA'S HOUSE OF HOPE | $1,100 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 45% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +57% for the ones you funded once.
134 repeat relationships — 76 still active in FY2025, 58 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KYKINGSWOOD YOUTH CENTER INC6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +61%
- TCTRIANGLE CLUB INC6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +4%
- TCThe Chase Home6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +78%
Funded once
- STST THOMAS EPISCOPAL CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $2k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $1k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.
CityHope walks with individuals and families, empowering and equipping them with the necessary resources and skills needed to thrive in their communities. By providing support services to those experiencing financial hardships and housing…
Harbor Care's mission is to provide vital services, including housing and healthcare to all in our communities needing assistance. Our vision is one where everyone gets to live safe, stable, and healthy lives, filled with purpose, respect…
Transitional and permanent supportive housing - provides shelter in the greater Manchester NH area. Services include housing, counseling (including substance abuse counseling), job search assistance, etc.
To provide legal representation and social services advocacy to new hampshire low-income and underserved children across multiple legal contexts.
Headrest, Inc. is a nonprofit corporation that provides information and referral, crisis intervention and other related services through the uses of a telephone hotline and office visitations. Headrest also provides counseling and…
We exist to share the hope of the Gospel of Jesus Christ as well as provide shelter, food, and clothing to the poor and needy in obedience to Him.
ARCNH community recovery center is a Peer-to-Peer recovery coaching program that is designed to provide those on the path to recovery with individualized care and support from those with personal experiences with SUDS
See schedule othe children's advocacy center of hampshire county (cac) provides a coordinated, culturally competent, multidisciplinary team response to allegations of child abuse in a dedicated, child-friendly setting. the cac brings…
The dismas home of new hampshire provides a safe, nurturing environment to formerly incarcerated women. these women often have no place to go but the streets, a cheap boarding house or a location and situation that contributed to the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dover Childrens Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is New Durham Food Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 240 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KINGSWOOD YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds New Durham Food Pantry ↗
- Who funds TRIANGLE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds The Chase Home ↗
- Who funds HAVEN VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SUPPORT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Seacoast Community School ↗
- Who funds ZEBRA CROSSINGS ↗
- Who funds MALLEY FARM FOR WOMEN ↗
- Who funds HOPE ON HAVEN HILL INC ↗
- Who funds ARTS IN REACH - ENCOURAGING GROWTH THROUGH THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds MY FRIEND'S PLACE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · A Caring Community Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · First Seacoast Community Foundation Inc · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Federal Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Foundation for Seacoast Health · Arthur Jr Dobles & Olive G Dobles Crut · Granite United Way · Lighthouse Credit Union Foundation · Arthur L Getz Charitable Tr
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Abraham Burtman Charity Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.