Skip to content

· Private foundation

Abraham & Florence Mendel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0167% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$422kEducation$25kYouth Development$2kPhilanthropy$2kInternational$300Other$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$1,850
Median grant
1
States reached
$45k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ICHUD MOSDOS HACHINUCH$50,000
HEBREW ACADAMY OF LONG BEACH$10,325
VARIOUS AMOUNTS UNDER 250$1,850
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$575
ZICHRON AVOS$360
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 71% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YESHIVA TORAS CHAIM OF SOUTH SHORE: $40k → 6%YESHIVA DARCHAI TORAH: $50k → 13%TZUR FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%YESHIVA TORAS CHAIM SOUTH SHORE: $36k → 6%CONG OHAVEI SHALOM: $1k → 13%ORTHODOX UNION: $11k → 17%MERCY CHASIDEI VISHNITZ: $2k → 20%YESHIVA TORAS CHAIM SOUTH SHORE: $9k → 6%MISC CONTRIBUTIONS: $8k → 17%MERKAZ CHASIDEI VIZNITZ INC: $1k → 20%YESHIVA TORAS CHAIM SOUTH SHORE: $5k → 6%CENTER FOR INITIATIVES JEWISH EDUCATION: $3k → 17%YESHIVA BEIS YOSEF TZVI: $1k → 20%NORTH SHORE HEBREW ACADEMY: $7k → 6%MISC CONTRIBUTIONS: $7k → 17%NORTH SHORE HEBREW ACADEMY: $6k → 6%BAYIS LEPLATIOS: $1k → 20%NORTH SHORE HEBREW ACADEMY: $5k → 6%MEDNEL FAMILY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%HEBREW ACADAMY OF LONG BEACH: $10k → 6%DAVIS RENOV STAHLER YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL: $10k → 6%AGUDATH ISRAEL: $1k → 17%DRS YESHIVA HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 6%ALWAYS OUR KIDS INC: $1k → 20%MISC CONTRIBUTIONS: $8k → 6%ALWAYS OUR KIDS: $1k → 20%HEBREW ACADAMY OF LONG BEACH: $7k → 6%ICHUD MOSDOS HACHINUCH: $50k → 20%DONATIONS UNDER 500: $3k → 6%CONG TOLDOS AVROHOM YITZCHOK: $10k → 20%VARIOUS DONATIONS: $3k → 6%CONG TOLDOS AVROHOM YITZCHAK: $5k → 20%BAIS MEDRASH OF HARBORVIEW: $3k → 6%CONG TOLDOS AVRUHOM YITZCHOK: $2k → 20%VARIOUS DONATIONS: $2k → 6%CONG TOLDOS AVROHOM YITZCHOK: $2k → 20%VARIOUS AMOUNTS UNDER 250: $2k → 6%TOLDOS AVRUM YITZCHOK: $1k → 20%KHAL ZICHRON MEIR MOSHE: $2k → 6%SHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $7k → 6%AHAVAS CHESED: $2k → 20%ICHUD MOSDOS HACHINUCH: $61k → 20%ICHUD MOSDOS HACHINUCH: $50k → 20%ICHUD MOSDOS HACHINUCH: $38k → 20%ICHUD MOSDOS HACHINUCH: $25k → 20%ICHUD MOSDOS HACHINUCH: $25k → 20%ICHUD MOSDES HACHINUCH: $20k → 20%ICHUD MOSDES HACHINUCH: $18k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$432k · 14 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
36

Total granted

$432k
$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+71%

Still filing today

21%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
EducationPhilanthropyReligionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    NORTH SHORE HEBREW ACADEMY
    3× · 2019–2021 · $19k · revenue +61%
  • SS
    SHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $8k · revenue +22%
  • AO
    ALWAYS OUR KIDS INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $2k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • YD
    YESHIVA DARCHAI TORAH
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • YA
    YESHIVA AND MESIVTA TORAS CHAIM OF GREATER NEW YORK AT SOUTH SHORE
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • OU
    ORTHODOX UNION
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Yeshiva Shaarei Oorah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for high school aged students

Religion
4
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
5
Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
6
Yeshiva of Los Angeles Girls High School

To provide academic excellence in both limudei kodesh and secular studies.

—
7
Kollel Ohr Hatorah Inc

To expand torah education

Religion
8
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
9
Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
10
Yeshiva Shaar Hatalmud

Providing jewish education to high school age students.

Education
11
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
12
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva Ohr Yehuda Inc; the most unlike its peers is Always Our Kids Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ICHUD MOSDOS HACHINUCH IN BROOKLYN: $249,000 · OtherICHUD MOSDOS HACHINUCH IN BROOKLYNYESHIVA DARCHAI TORAH: $50,000 · OtherYESHIVA DARCHAI TORAHYESHIVA TORAS CHAIM SOUTH SHORE: $49,920 · OtherYESHIVA TORAS CHAIM SOUTH SHOREYESHIVA AND MESIVTA TORAS CHAIM OF GREATER NEW YORK AT SOUTH SHORE: $40,000 · OtherYESHIVA AND MESIVTA TORAS CHAIM OF GREATER NEW YORK AT SOUTH SHOREIndividual grant recipient: $38,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $23,020 · Other+40 more: $118,003 · Other+40 moreSHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $7,600 · EducationCENTER FOR INITIATIVES IN JEWISH EDUCATION: $2,500 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BET EL YESHIVA: $500 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationALWAYS OUR KIDS INC: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER INC: $500 · PhilanthropyTHE VAANI TEFILLAH FOUNDATION: $500 · Philanthropy
Other$567,943Education$10,700Youth Development$2,000Religion$1,800Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTH SHORE HEBREW ACADEMY: $18,930 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $7,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR INITIATIVES IN JEWISH EDUCATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALWAYS OUR KIDS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VAANI TEFILLAH FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BET EL YESHIVA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA OHR YEHUDA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTH SHORE HEBREW ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds SHULAMITH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR INITIATIVES IN JEWISH EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds ALWAYS OUR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds TZUR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KESHER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY21.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Caroline & Joseph S Gruss Life Monument Funds Inc · The Ojc Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Abraham & Florence Mendel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Abraham & Florence Mendel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Yeshiva Ohr Yehuda Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Abraham & Florence Mendel’s filings →

More from the funding graph