Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ability to Succeed Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$20kHuman Services$13kRecreation & Sports$13kEducation$7kFood & Nutrition$6kYouth Development$3kReligion$2k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$244k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LETTING EVERYONE ACHIEVE DREAMS$3,000
J'S HOUSE$2,000
KIDS' MEALS INC$2,000
WORLD VISION INC$2,000
HOPE SPEAKS INTERNATIONAL$2,000
FRIENDS OF KINGWOOD BASEBALL$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%J'S HOUSE: $3k → 16%J'S HOUSE: $2k → 16%KIDS' MEALS INC: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Ability to Succeed Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Ability to Succeed Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$35k · 6 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
3

Total granted

$35k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+90%

Still filing today

67%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsInternationalReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    Softball Sisters
    2× · 2020–2021 · $8k · 32% of their budget
  • YM
    Young Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area
    4× · 2021–2024 · $8k · revenue +12%
  • L
    LIFT-UP
    2× · 2023–2024 · $7k

Funded once

  • HI
    HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • CI
    COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SAN ANTONIOgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +90%
  • PM
    PROBE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Communities in Schools of Central Texas

Communities in schools of central texas (cisct) ensures students have holistic support, removing academic and nonacademic barriers to their success in school.

Education
2
Communities in Schools of Baytown Inc

Our mission is to surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Education
3
Kids Hope Usa

Kids Hope USA connects churches and organizations with neighborhood elementary schools to operate a proven, established school-based mentoring program. Through these partnerships, Kids Hope USA mobilizes Christ-followers as trained…

Education
4
Girls Incorporated of Greater Houston

The mission of Girls Incorporated of Greater Houston is to inspire all girls to be strong, smart and bold.

Youth Development
5
Communities in Schools of the South Plains Inc

To meet the needs of students in at-risk situations by improving academics, marketable skills, attendance, and behavior through the partnership of school, home, and community so that young people stay in school, learn successfully and…

Youth Development
6
Communities in Schools of the Heart of Texas

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Human Services
7
St John's School

See Schedule OSt. John's School is an independent, co-educational day school presenting a 13-year sequence of college preparatory training. A non-profit institution, it was founded in 1946 to provide the community with a school of exacting…

—
8
Presbyterian School

Family, School, and Church united in the education and support of each child - this is the founding premise upon which Presbyterian School nurtures and challenges its students. The school provides an educational program of the highest…

Education
9
The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…

—
10
Yes Prep Public Schools Inc

YES Prep Public Schools, Inc. prepares low-income youth to enter a four-year college or university by implementing an innovative and rigorous academic program which also emphasizes community service.

Education
11
Lutheran Education Association of Houston

The mission of the Lutheran Education Association of Houston (LEAH) is to operate and champion exemplary Lutheran schools in the Houston area to expand Christ's Kingdom.

—
12
The Greatest School in West Houston

Christian pre-school from age 3-months to school-age, and school from

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities in Schools of Houston Inc; the most unlike its peers is Softball Sisters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WORLD VISION INC: $13,450 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCSERVE HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $4,900 · InternationalSERVE HOPE INTERNATIONALYoung Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area: $8,000 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Asso…JS HOUSE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesJS HOUSE INCKIDS' MEALS INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesKIDS' MEALS INCLIFT-UP: $6,515 · OtherLIFT-UPHOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $3,000 · OtherHOUSTON INDEPENDE…LETTING EVERYONE ACHIEVE DREAMS: $3,000 · EducationLETTING EVERYON…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF HOUSTON INC: $2,750 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN …FRIENDS OF KINGWOOD BASEBALL: $1,500 · EducationFRIENDS OF KING…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SAN ANTONIO: $1,500 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN …Softball Sisters: $8,000 · Recreation & SportsSoftball Siste…HOPE SPEAKS INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 · HealthPROBE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $1,500 · Religion
International$18,350Human Services$15,000Other$9,515Education$8,750Recreation & Sports$8,000Health$2,000Religion$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD VISION INC: $13,450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSoftball Sisters: $8,000 over 2y, 32% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJS HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSERVE HOPE INTERNATIONAL: $4,900 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLETTING EVERYONE ACHIEVE DREAMS: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF HOUSTON INC: $2,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE SPEAKS INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SAN ANTONIO: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROBE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ability to Succeed Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ability to Succeed Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ability to Succeed Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ability to Succeed Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ability to Succeed’s filings →

    More from the funding graph