Skip to content

· Private foundation

Abdolhossein and Guitty Ejtemai Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$7.5MArts & Culture$429kHealth$254kInternational$240kCrime & Legal$139kEducation$110kHuman Services$79kFood & Nutrition$27kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $168k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $160k
  • $250k+2 grants · $650k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$110M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$400,000
BAHA'I NATIONAL CENTER$250,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH$100,000
BAHA'I FUND$60,000
AFGHAN RELIEF FUND$25,000
IRAN 1400 INC$25,000
CHILDREN OF PERSIA$16,050
PARS PLACE$15,105
JOURNALISM FOR CHANGE INC$15,000
ARTS COUNCIL OF THE VALLEY$15,000
THE WASHINGTON BALLET$15,000
JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY$12,000
RAD ARTS FOUNDATION$10,000
EASTER SEALS$10,000
ASSOCIATION OF THE FRIENDS OF PERSIAN CULTURE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $173k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEW ERA CREATIVE SPACE: $500 → 9%AFGHAN RELEIF FUND: $25k → 7%AFGHAN RELIEF FUND: $25k → 7%DIAKONIA: $750 → 8%AFGHAN RELIEF FUND: $25k → 7%AFGHAN RELIEF FUND: $20k → 7%AFGHAN RELIEF FUND: $20k → 7%GUIDING EYES FOR THE BLIND: $100 → 9%AFGHAN RELEIF FUND: $20k → 7%AFGHAN RELIEF FUND: $15k → 7%AFGHAN RELIEF FUND: $12k → 7%afghan relief fund: $10k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
WV
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.6M · 65 repeat orgs$903k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

65 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 48 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

65
97

Total granted

$8.6M
$191k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+5%

Still filing today

38%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $712k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalArts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AR
    AFGHAN RELIEF FUND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $172k · revenue +89%
  • TT
    THE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER
    7× · 2017–2023 · $139k · revenue +92%
  • TW
    THE WASHINGTON BALLET
    7× · 2019–2025 · $95k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF LA VERNE
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue -10%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MD FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • UO
    University of Maryland Foundation The Baha'i Chair for World Peace
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way Worldwide

To improve lives by mobilizing caring power of communities around the world to advance common good.

Philanthropy
2
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
3
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
4
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
5
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
6
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
7
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
8
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
9
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
10
Arcadia Food Inc

Cultivate local food systems prioritizing health, equity, and sustainability, from farm forward.

Food & Nutrition
11
Meridian International Center

Meridian international center is a nonpartisan diplomacy institution founded in 1960 to advance american leadership. headquartered on a historic campus in washington dc, our mission is to empower leaders to advance the next era of…

International
12
Washington Office On Latin America

To advance human rights and social justice in the americas.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Virginia Congress of Parents and Teachers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 171 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/66
Grantees still filing
40/66
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL SPIRITUAL ASSEMBLY OF THE BAHAIS OF THE UNITED STATES: $4,755,000 · OtherNATIONAL SPIRITUAL ASSEMBLY OF THE BAHAIS OF THE UNITED STATESBAHA'I FUND: $1,629,000 · OtherBAHA'I FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $400,000 · OtherBAHA'I NATIONAL FUND: $321,110 · Other+130 more: $1,727,425 · Other+130 moreTHE WASHINGTON BALLET: $95,000 · Arts & CultureJOURNALISM FOR CHANGE INC: $90,000 · Arts & CultureRAD ARTS FOUNDATION: $15,570 · Arts & CultureARTS COUNCIL OF THE VALLEY: $15,000 · Arts & CultureJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $8,300 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $8,100 · Arts & CultureAFGHAN RELIEF FUND INC: $172,000 · Human Services+3 more: $1,350 · Human ServicesTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER: $138,500 · Civil RightsIRAN 1400 INC: $25,000 · InternationalCHILDREN OF PERSIA INC: $16,050 · InternationalSIAMAK POURZAND FOUNDATION: $15,000 · InternationalTwo Chairs Inc: $4,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 · International+6 more: $1,250 · InternationalBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $31,750 · HealthMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $3,925 · Health+8 more: $2,315 · HealthWomen Giving Back Inc: $23,500 · Employment
Other$8,832,535Arts & Culture$231,970Human Services$173,350Civil Rights$138,500International$64,300Health$37,990Employment$23,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAFGHAN RELIEF FUND INC: $172,000 over 9y, 8.2% of budgetTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER: $138,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetTHE WASHINGTON BALLET: $95,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetJOURNALISM FOR CHANGE INC: $90,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $31,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIRAN 1400 INC: $25,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetWomen Giving Back Inc: $23,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetRAD ARTS FOUNDATION: $15,570 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF LA VERNE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTS COUNCIL OF THE VALLEY: $15,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSAFEHOME SYSTEMS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $8,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFreedom Hill Elementary School PTA: $7,868 over 3y, 11% of budgetMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Theatre Company and School: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA: $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTwo Chairs Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC: $3,925 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetResonance Collective: $2,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetReal Food for Kids: $1,540 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFeeding America: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVIENNA YOUTH SOCCER INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIENNA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILLIPS PROGRAMS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCH WORLD SERVICE INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDIAKONIA INC: $750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTWOOD COUNTRY CLUB INC: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKEEN GREATER DC LLC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIRANIAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEW ERA CREATIVE SPACE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetToo Young to Wed Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSTREETLIGHT COMMUNITY OUTREACH MINISTRIES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCCER WITHOUT BORDERS: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $365 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGLEN ECHO PARK PARTNERSHIP FOR ARTS AND CULTURE INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD & FRIENDS INC: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AFGHAN RELIEF FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE WASHINGTON BALLET ↗
  • Who funds JOURNALISM FOR CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds IRAN 1400 INC ↗
  • Who funds Women Giving Back Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN OF PERSIA INC ↗
  • Who funds RAD ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF LA VERNE ↗
  • Who funds SIAMAK POURZAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTS COUNCIL OF THE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds SAFEHOME SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Freedom Hill Elementary School PTA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aryan Hope FoundationDE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aryan Hope Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Abdolhossein and Guitty Ejtemai Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Abdolhossein and Guitty Ejtemai Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Diakonia Inc: 51% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Connecticut Foodshare Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Glen Echo Park Partnership for Arts and Culture Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 171 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Abdolhossein and Guitty Ejtemai’s filings →

More from the funding graph