Skip to content

· Private foundation

Abc Charities Formerly Indianapolis Ade Charities Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$678k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$215k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$4.9MEnvironment$1.4MInternational$663kRecreation & Sports$73kYouth Development$26kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $116k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $551k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$341k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATING MINISTRIES$214,702
STREAMS IN THE DESERT$132,986
CHILD LEGACY INTERNATIONAL$117,000
GRACE RELATIONS (SHEPARD COMMUNITY)$86,667
CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST$25,500
COLLEGE OF BIBLICAL STUDIES - HOUSTON$25,000
GOOD NEWS MINISTRIES$23,000
BROOKVILLE ROAD COMMUNITY CHURCH$20,000
SPORTS WORLD MINISTRY$12,000
CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP$10,200
EMERGING EAGLES$6,720
BAPTIST INTERNATIONAL EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES$3,840
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BLESSING OF HOPE: $37k → 9%CHILD LEGACY INTERNATIONAL: $175k → 7%COLLEGE OF BIBLICAL STUDIES - HOUSTOON: $115k → 16%CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $124k → 13%CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP: $83k → 8%THE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE: $100k → 8%BROOKVILLE ROAD COMMUNITY CHURCH: $30k → 5%BAPTIST INTERNATIONAL EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES: $222k → 5%GRACE RELATIONS (SHEPARD COMMUNITY): $87k → 16%INTERNATIONAL COOPERATING MINISTRIE: $1.2M → 14%STREAMS IN THE DESERT: $294k → 15%CHILD LEGACY INTERNATIONAL: $117k → 7%COLLEGE OF BIBLICAL STUDIES - HOUSTOON: $58k → 16%CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $82k → 13%CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP: $36k → 8%BROOKVILLE ROAD COMMUNITY CHURCH: $30k → 5%GRACE RELATIONS (SHEPARD COMMUNITY): $65k → 16%INTERNATIONAL COOPERATING MINISTRIE: $999k → 14%STREAMS IN THE DESERT: $238k → 15%CHILD LEGACY INTERNATIONAL: $109k → 7%COLLEGE OF BIBLICAL STUDIES - HOUSTON: $25k → 16%CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $58k → 13%CHILD EVANG FELLOWSHIP: $14k → 8%BROOKVILLE ROAD COMMUNITY CHURCH: $20k → 5%INTERNATIONAL COOPERATING MINISTRIES: $559k → 14%STREAMS IN THE DESERT: $182k → 15%CHILD LEGACY INTERNATIONAL: $108k → 7%COLLEGE OF BIBLICAL STUDIES - HOUSTOON: $14k → 16%CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $26k → 13%CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP: $10k → 8%BROOKVILLE ROAD COMMUNITY CHURCH: $20k → 5%INTERNATIONAL COOPERATING MINISTRIES: $483k → 14%STREAMS IN THE DESERT: $133k → 15%CHILD LEGACY INTERNATIONAL: $88k → 7%CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $26k → 13%BROOKVILLE ROAD COMMUNITY CHURCH: $10k → 5%INTERNATIONAL COOPERATING MINISTRIES: $215k → 14%STREAMS IN THE DESERT: $133k → 15%CHILD LEGACY INTERNATIONAL: $65k → 7%CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $26k → 13%INTERNATIONAL COOPERATING MINISTRIES: $76k → 14%GOOD NEWS MINISTRIES: $23k → 16%SPORTS WORLD MINISTRY: $13k → 16%SPORTS WORLD MINISTRY: $12k → 16%SPORTS WORLD MINISTRY: $12k → 16%SPORTS WORLD MINISTRY: $12k → 16%SPORTS WORLD MINISTRY: $12k → 16%SPORTS WORLD MINISTRY: $12k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
IN
PA
MO
KY
VA
NC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.9M · 13 repeat orgs$170k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
5

Total granted

$6.9M
$147k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+62%

Still filing today

31%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +32%
  • CL
    Child Legacy International Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $661k · revenue +11%
  • BI
    BAPTIST INTERNATIONAL EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $241k · revenue +124%

Funded once

  • TT
    THE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +62%
  • BO
    BLESSINGS OF HOPE
    one grant, 2022 · $37k
  • GC
    GRACE COLLECTIVE CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries: $3,578,782 · PhilanthropyThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Minis…STREAMS IN THE DESERT: $1,353,820 · OtherSTREAMS IN THE DESERTCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST: $340,235 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRISTBAPTIST INTERNATIONAL EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES INC: $241,470 · OtherBAPTIST INTERNATIONAL EVANGELISTIC MINISTRI…COLLEGE OF BIBLICAL STUDIES - HOUSTON: $211,889 · OtherCOLLEGE OF BIBLICAL STUDIES - HOUSTONGRACE RELATIONS (SHEPARD COMMUNITY): $151,667 · OtherGRACE RELATIONS (SHEPARD COMMUNITY)CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP INC: $136,328 · OtherBROOKVILLE ROAD COMMUNITY CHURCH INC: $110,119 · Other+8 more: $191,141 · Other+8 moreChild Legacy International Inc: $661,050 · ReligionChild Legacy…THE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INC: $100,000 · ReligionTHE TIMOTHY …Taylor University: $5,000 · EducationJUDEA HARVEST INCORPORATED: $1,700 · International
Philanthropy$3,578,782Other$2,736,669Religion$761,050Education$5,000International$1,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries: $3,578,782 over 6y, 5.0% of budgetChild Legacy International Inc: $661,050 over 6y, 10% of budgetBAPTIST INTERNATIONAL EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES INC: $241,470 over 6y, 5.1% of budgetCOLLEGE OF BIBLICAL STUDIES - HOUSTON: $211,889 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetTHE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTaylor University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDEA HARVEST INCORPORATED: $1,700 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Child Legacy International Inc ↗
  • Who funds BAPTIST INTERNATIONAL EVANGELISTIC MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF BIBLICAL STUDIES - HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds THE TIMOTHY INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Taylor University ↗
  • Who funds JUDEA HARVEST INCORPORATED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Abc Charities Formerly Indianapolis Ade Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Abc Charities Formerly Indianapolis Ade Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Abc Charities Formerly Indianapolis Ade Charities’ filings →

    More from the funding graph