Skip to content
Abboud Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Abboud Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$116k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$223kFood & Nutrition$181kReligion$133kHealth$57kPhilanthropy$11kArts & Culture$6kEnvironment$5kEducation$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $109k
$450
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PETER & PAUL CHURCH$37,455
HESED HOUSE$24,130
FAMILY FOCUS$16,000
LOAVES & FISHES$11,063
STARBILITY FOUNDATION$10,000
THE BIG RAISE INC$10,000
ST WILLIAM CATHOLIC CHURCH$1,150
ST PATRICK'S RESIDENCE NURSING AND REHABILITATION$1,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$1,000
LITTLE FRIENDS$1,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$450
ANTONINE SISTERS ADULT DAYCARE$440
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$306
HOPE FOR TANZANIA INC$258
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $283k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $250 → 11%THE BIG RAISE INC: $10k → 13%HOSPICE OF THE CALUMET AREA: $103 → 15%OHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $100 → 5%NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $103 → 17%HESED HOUSE: $24k → 8%THE BIG RAISE INC: $7k → 13%ANTONINE SISTERS ADULT DAYCARE: $500 → 19%HESED HOUSE: $15k → 8%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $100 → 11%THE BIG RAISE INC: $5k → 13%HESED HOUSE: $10k → 8%ANTONINE SISTERS ADULT DAYCARE: $450 → 19%HESED HOUSE: $10k → 8%ANTONINE SISTERS ADULT DAYCARE: $440 → 19%HESED HOUSE: $6k → 8%ANTONINE SISTERS ADULT DAYCARE: $370 → 19%HESED HOUSE: $5k → 8%ANTONINE SISTERS ADULT DAYCARE: $350 → 19%HESED HOUSE: $5k → 8%ANTONINE SISTERS ADULT DAYCARE: $250 → 19%360 YOUTH SERVICES: $600 → 7%ANTONINE SISTERS ADULT DAYCARE: $190 → 19%HESED HOUSE: $1k → 8%HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $250 → 19%SHARING CONNECTIONS: $100 → 7%WATERLEAF WOMEN'S CENTER: $103 → 7%WATERLEAF WOMEN'S CENTER: $102 → 7%WATERLEAF WOMEN'S CENTER: $50 → 7%LITTLE FRIENDS: $1k → 7%LOAVES & FISHES: $42k → 7%LOAVES & FISHES: $31k → 7%LOAVES & FISHES: $26k → 7%LOAVES & FISHES: $21k → 7%LOAVES & FISHES: $15k → 7%LOAVES & FISHES: $13k → 7%LOAVES & FISHES: $12k → 7%LOAVES & FISHES: $11k → 7%LOAVES & FISHES: $8k → 7%NAPERVILLE SENIORS IN ACTION: $1k → 7%360 YOUTH SERVICE: $100 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CA
MO
VA
AZ
NC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$590k · 31 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
60

Total granted

$590k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+27%

Still filing today

52%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyAnimalsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LF
    LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $178k · revenue +124%
  • PA
    PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $77k · revenue +139%
  • SF
    STARABILITY FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $37k · revenue +952%

Funded once

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +39%
  • PA
    PEN AMERICAN CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +30%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
2
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
3
Authoracare Collective

Authoracare collective empowers people to be active participants in their care journey, enabling them to live on their own terms through personalized support for mind, body, and spirit.

Human Services
4
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
5
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
6
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
7
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
8
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
9
Alliance for Aging Research

The alliance for aging research is the leading nonprofit organization dedicated to changing the narrative to achieve healthy aging and equitable access to care.

—
10
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
11
Leadingage Inc

The mission of leadingage is to be the trusted voice for aging. our 6,000+ members and partners include nonprofit organizations representing the entire field of aging services, 38 state associations, hundreds of businesses, consumer…

Housing & Shelter
12
Asante

Asante exists to provide quality healthcare services in a compassionate manner, valued by the communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Big Raise Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/48
Grantees still filing
36/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $178,174 · Human ServicesLOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICESPUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE: $76,580 · Human ServicesPUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HO…THE BIG RAISE INC: $21,800 · Human ServicesTHE BIG RAISE INC+12 more: $6,611 · Human ServicesST PETER & PAUL CHURCH: $117,807 · OtherST PETER & PAUL CHURCHFAMILY FOCUS: $114,931 · OtherFAMILY FOCUS+60 more: $43,556 · Other+60 moreSTARABILITY FOUNDATION INC: $37,123 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $8,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $2,500 · PhilanthropyPEN AMERICAN CENTER INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $250 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN WRITERS MUSEUM: $250 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $104 · Arts & CultureTHE MORTON ARBORETUM: $4,630 · EnvironmentAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,455 · HealthONE MISSION INC: $1,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $250 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $213 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $206 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $206 · Health+3 more: $205 · HealthRun the Reagan Inc: $2,500 · Food & NutritionFOX VALLEY FOOD FOR HEALTH INC: $100 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$283,165Other$276,294Philanthropy$47,623Arts & Culture$5,604Environment$4,630Health$3,535Food & Nutrition$2,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $178,174 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetPUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE: $76,580 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSTARABILITY FOUNDATION INC: $37,123 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BIG RAISE INC: $21,800 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEN AMERICAN CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MORTON ARBORETUM: $4,630 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetANTONINE SISTERS ADULT DAY CARE: $2,550 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRun the Reagan Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $1,455 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetANTONINE VILLAGE: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE FRIENDS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE MISSION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget360 YOUTH SERVICES: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $610 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA'S CHARITIES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEdward Foundation: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of the Valley: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWaterleaf Women's Center Inc: $255 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN WRITERS MUSEUM: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of the Valley Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $213 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $206 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $206 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation: $204 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWALTER & CONNIE PAYTON FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBEATITUDE HOUSE INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS FOR ANIMALS INC: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $105 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEVEL GROUND: $104 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEAST OHIO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS MIDWEST: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS CHICAGO: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO LIVING FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOX VALLEY FOOD FOR HEALTH INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARING CONNECTIONS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBACK ON MY FEET: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS: $51 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGATEWAY FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCaringBridge: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds STARABILITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BIG RAISE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MORTON ARBORETUM ↗
  • Who funds ANTONINE SISTERS ADULT DAY CARE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds Run the Reagan Inc ↗
  • Who funds Soles of Luv ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANTONINE VILLAGE ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds Naperville Seniors In Action ↗
  • Who funds ONE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds 360 YOUTH SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA'S CHARITIES ↗
  • Who funds Edward Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN YEARS INC ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of the Valley ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Youngstown Fdn GeneralPremier Bank Foundati…Northwestern Memorial…The Dupage Community …Arthur J Gallagher Fo…F Ralph & Mary T Fage…Exchange Club Charita…Flor Navarro Family F…Mahoning Valley Hospi…Naperville Rotary Cha…The Chicago Community…AbbVie Foundation
Youngstown Fdn GeneralOH21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Youngstown Fdn General · Premier Bank Foundation · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · The Dupage Community Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · F Ralph & Mary T Fagert Pfdn · Exchange Club Charitable Organization · Flor Navarro Family Foundation · Mahoning Valley Hospital Foundation · Naperville Rotary Charities Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · AbbVie Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Abboud Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Abboud Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 96 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Abboud Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home