· Private foundation
Abboud Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $7k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $109k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST PETER & PAUL CHURCH | $37,455 |
| HESED HOUSE | $24,130 |
| FAMILY FOCUS | $16,000 |
| LOAVES & FISHES | $11,063 |
| THE BIG RAISE INC | $10,000 |
| STARBILITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| ST WILLIAM CATHOLIC CHURCH | $1,150 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES | $1,000 |
| LITTLE FRIENDS | $1,000 |
| ST PATRICK'S RESIDENCE NURSING AND REHABILITATION | $1,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $500 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION | $450 |
| ANTONINE SISTERS ADULT DAYCARE | $440 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $306 |
| HOPE FOR TANZANIA INC | $258 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $283k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
31 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LFLOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES9× · 2017–2025 · $178k · revenue +124%
- PAPUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE8× · 2017–2025 · $77k · revenue +139%
- SFSTARABILITY FOUNDATION INC3× · 2020–2025 · $37k · revenue +952%
Funded once
- UJUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +39%
- PAPEN AMERICAN CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +30%
- UWUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INCone grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -9%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…
The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.
Authoracare collective empowers people to be active participants in their care journey, enabling them to live on their own terms through personalized support for mind, body, and spirit.
As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.
Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…
Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…
The alliance for aging research is the leading nonprofit organization dedicated to changing the narrative to achieve healthy aging and equitable access to care.
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
The mission of leadingage is to be the trusted voice for aging. our 6,000+ members and partners include nonprofit organizations representing the entire field of aging services, 38 state associations, hundreds of businesses, consumer…
Asante exists to provide quality healthcare services in a compassionate manner, valued by the communities we serve.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Big Raise Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOAVES & FISHES COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC ACTION TO DELIVER SHELTER INC D/B/A HESED HOUSE ↗
- Who funds STARABILITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE BIG RAISE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE MORTON ARBORETUM ↗
- Who funds ANTONINE SISTERS ADULT DAY CARE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC ↗
- Who funds Run the Reagan Inc ↗
- Who funds Soles of Luv ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds ANTONINE VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds LITTLE FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds ONE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds Naperville Seniors In Action ↗
- Who funds 360 YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICA'S CHARITIES ↗
- Who funds Edward Foundation ↗
- Who funds GOLDEN YEARS INC ↗
- Who funds Hospice of the Valley ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Youngstown Fdn General · Premier Bank Foundation · Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group · The Dupage Community Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · F Ralph & Mary T Fagert Pfdn · Exchange Club Charitable Organization · Flor Navarro Family Foundation · Mahoning Valley Hospital Foundation · Naperville Rotary Charities Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · AbbVie Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Abboud Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.