Skip to content

· Private foundation

Aalfs Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$290k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$134k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$646kHuman Services$371kHealth$259kReligion$190kArts & Culture$174kRecreation & Sports$119kYouth Development$115kEducation$93kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $134k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$134,000
UNITED WAY OF SIOUXLAND$30,000
BOYS AND GIRLS HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES$25,000
ST THOMAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH ENDOWMENT$20,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS$15,000
GIRLS INC$10,000
SANFORD COMMUNITY CENTER$10,000
SIOUX CITY ART CENTER ASSOCIATION$10,000
SIOUX CITY LIBRARY FOUNDATION$10,000
SIOUX CITY PUBLIC MUSEUM$5,000
GOODFELLOW CHARITIES$5,000
THE ORPHEUM THEATRE ENDOWMENT INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
THE FIRST TEE OF SIOUXLAND$2,000
SATURDAY IN THE PARK$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $107k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CAMP HIGH HOPES: $100k → 13%CAMP HIGH HOPES: $5k → 13%WOMEN AWARE: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 21 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
6

Total granted

$1.5M
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+8%

Still filing today

48%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SR
    SIOUXLAND REGIONAL CANCER CENTER
    5× · 2017–2021 · $250k · revenue +112%
  • CH
    CAMP HIGH HOPES
    2× · 2017–2023 · $105k · revenue +111%
  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • MS
    MERCYONE SIOUXLAND ADVOCACY CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • S
    SAFEPLACE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -18%
  • TC
    THE CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF SIOUXLAND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sioux City Housing Trust Fund Inc

To act as the local governing board of sioux city housing trust fund by collecting and disbursing revenue for the purpose of encouraging the development and redevelopment of affordable housing for sioux city's income qualified residents.

Housing & Shelter
2
Sioux City Community Theater

Promotion of and presentation of dramatic arts

Arts & Culture
3
Sioux Falls State Theatre Company

The sioux falls state theatre company is a 501(c)(3) organization with a mission to preserve a historic landmark and provide community access to a unique state-of-the-art entertainment and education venue. the renovated state theatre will…

Arts & Culture
4
Siouxland Chamber of Commerce

Improve the quality of the siouxland area

—
5
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
6
Iowa Women's Foundation

The iowa women's foundation is committed to improving the lives of iowa's women and girls. we use research to uncover barriers to women's success as well as their greatest needs, and we invest our passion and resources accordingly.

Human Services
7
Siouxland Senior Center

To enrich the quality of life and support independence and vitality for our members. this is done by meeting the social, recreational and educational needs of members, in an environment that is fun, safe, inclusive and courteous for all

Human Services
8
Boys and Girls Home of Sioux City Iowa

Financial assistance to other 501(c)(3) organizations

—
9
South Central Iowa Community Action Program Inc

To provide advocacy and services for disadvantaged persons and bring about institutional change for the benefit of the people we serve and the community at large. (see schedule o).to achieve this mission, scicap operates programs to…

Community Improvement
10
Sioux Falls Arts Council

Our mission is to enrich sioux falls culture, economy, and opportunity by building a stronger and more vibrant arts community.

—
11
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Siouxland

Establish relationships between siouxland youth and mature, responsible screened adult volunteers.

—
12
Siouxland Pace Inc

To improve the health of the people and the communities we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Siouxland Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Orpheum Theatre Preservation Projectltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $320,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES INCST THOMAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH ENDOWMENT: $190,000 · OtherST THOMAS EPISCOPAL CHURCH ENDOWMENTSIOUX CITY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $90,000 · OtherSIOUX CITY LIBRARY FOUNDATIONSIOUX CITY ART CENTER ASSOCIATION: $90,000 · OtherSIOUX CITY ART CENTER ASSOCIATIONBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS: $55,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBSIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherSANFORD CENTER: $40,000 · Other+8 more: $94,000 · Other+8 moreSIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $486,000 · PhilanthropySIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONUNITED WAY OF SIOUXLAND INC: $145,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SIOUXLAND INCSIOUXLAND REGIONAL CANCER CENTER: $250,000 · HealthSIOUXLAND REGI…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF IOWA INC: $9,000 · HealthCAMP HIGH HOPES: $105,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesORPHEUM THEATRE ENDOWMENT INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureORPHEUM THEATRE PRESERVATION PROJECTLTD: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSATURDAY IN THE PARK INC: $9,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF SIOUXLAND INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentBRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationMORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · Education
Other$924,000Philanthropy$631,000Health$259,000Human Services$107,000Arts & Culture$54,000Youth Development$50,000Education$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $486,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetSIOUXLAND REGIONAL CANCER CENTER: $250,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SIOUXLAND INC: $145,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetCAMP HIGH HOPES: $105,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY: $50,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetSANFORD CENTER: $40,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetORPHEUM THEATRE ENDOWMENT INC: $30,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetORPHEUM THEATRE PRESERVATION PROJECTLTD: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF IOWA INC: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSATURDAY IN THE PARK INC: $9,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSAFEPLACE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF SIOUXLAND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWOMEN AWARE: $2,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SIOUXLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SIOUXLAND REGIONAL CANCER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SIOUXLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP HIGH HOPES ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY ↗
  • Who funds SANFORD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ORPHEUM THEATRE ENDOWMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds ORPHEUM THEATRE PRESERVATION PROJECTLTD ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF IOWA INC ↗
  • Who funds SATURDAY IN THE PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFEPLACE ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF SIOUXLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN AWARE ↗
  • Who funds BRIAR CLIFF UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MORNINGSIDE UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Missouri River Historical Development IncIA32.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Missouri River Historical Development Inc · The Chesterman Family Foundation · Peterson Family Foundation · Berenstein Family Foundation · Waitt Foundation · Gleeson Family Foundation · Ronald B and Joan B Krage Foundation · Michael & Marjory Bennett Foundation · The Roth & Letch Family Charitable Foundation · Helios Foundation · Siouxland Community Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Aalfs Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Aalfs Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Aalfs Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph