· Private foundation
A to Z Impact Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k24 grants · $28k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MANJUSHREE CHARITABLE SOCIETY | $125,000 |
| THE WATER TRUST INC | $25,000 |
| COVENANT HOUSE | $5,000 |
| MYRIAD USA INC | $3,675 |
| MTINDO FOUNDATION INC | $3,500 |
| MERIDIAN INSTITUTE | $2,550 |
| GIRLS GARAGE | $1,180 |
| LONG ISLAND COUNCIL OF CHURCHES | $1,000 |
| CAMP - A FASD COMMUNITY | $1,000 |
| LANDPATHS | $900 |
| PROJECT STREET VET | $900 |
| ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO | $900 |
| SEAN CASEY ANIMAL RESCUE INC | $750 |
| INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS | $750 |
| URBAN INITIATIVES INC | $750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 83% of grant dollars ($1.3M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 17% that went abroad ($251k) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $373k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Beyond the US — 17% of all-years giving ($251k)
2 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TLTHE LTP FOUNDATION INC3× · 2020–2022 · $300k · revenue +51% · 50% of their budget
- TWTHE WATER TRUST INC7× · 2017–2024 · $240k · revenue +43%
- LCLwala Community Alliance2× · 2018–2020 · $25k · revenue +961%
Funded once
- NYNEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATIONone grant, 2020 · $108k
- DDASRAgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +125%
- SSSOCIAL SECURITY WORKS EDUCATION FUNDgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue +74%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to build a movement of global citizens whose actions will help achieve our vision of a world without extreme poverty.
Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.
To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.
Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…
Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…
For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…
Nuru is a global collective that enables inclusive and sustainable prosperity by identifying communities at the stability tipping point, strengthening rural livelihoods and market systems, and fostering stabilizing connections that repair…
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
Global communities brings together local ingenuity and global insights to save lives and secure strong futures.
Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Little Sisters of the Assumption Family Health Service Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hudson Valley Center for Comp Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
103 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 103 of the 161 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE LTP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE WATER TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
- Who funds DASRA ↗
- Who funds NYAYA HEALTH ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL SECURITY WORKS EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds RED DOOR COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
- Who funds Lwala Community Alliance ↗
- Who funds COMPREHENSIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE ASSUMPTION FAMILY HEALTH SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Peace Development Fund ↗
- Who funds THE SULLIVAN COUNTY FEDERATION FOR HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds WILKES UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ZANMI BENI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LIFE HOUSE FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds OUR LADY OF ARMENIA INC ↗
- Who funds LONG ISLAND COUNCIL OF CHURCHES INC ↗
- Who funds JOYEUX FOUNDATION US ↗
- Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY WORKSHOP INC DBA FORWARD GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds CONVENERS-ORG ↗
- Who funds NOVA UKRAINE ↗
- Who funds THE PEOPLES PARTNERS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE NEW JERSEY INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Deerfield Partnership Foundation · Rippleworks Inc · The Ford Foundation · Fjc · The Rockefeller Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · The Windham Foundation Inc · Pinkerton Foundation · The Vermont Community Foundation · Select Equity Group Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization A to Z Impact Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Safe Passage Inc — 55% of income from government
- Vermont Works for Women Inc — 52% of income from government
- Covenant House New Jersey Inc — 34% of income from government
- Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont — 31% of income from government
- Come Alive Outside — 27% of income from government
- Outright Vermont — 13% of income from government
- Moore Free Library — 12% of income from government
- Karuna Center for Peacebuilding Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to A to Z Impact Foundation?
Find your warmest path to A to Z Impact Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.