Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

A Keenan Tr Matthew Keenan End Fd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$88k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$538kEducation$116kPhilanthropy$86kHuman Services$50k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $72k
$11,965
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$19,942
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN$15,954
BREAD OF HEALING CLINIC INC$11,965
ASCENSION ST BEN CLINIC$11,965
ASCENSION SETON DENTAL CLINIC$11,965
Individual grant recipient$7,977
PENFIELD CHILDREN CENTER$7,977
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%ST JOSEPH ACADEMY: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$784k · 15 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
1

Total granted

$784k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+21%

Still filing today

60%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $111k · revenue +54%
  • BREAD OF HEALING INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $107k · revenue +114%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $71k · revenue +128%

Funded once

  • ST JOSEPH ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +21%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Froedtert & the Medical College of Wisconsin Community Physicians Inc

To advance the health of our communities through excellence and discovery, inspiring each person to live their unique, best life.

Health
2
Children's Medical Group Inc

To provide quality, accessible primary health care services to all children in our community, advocate for the well-being of all children, educate children, families, health care professionals and our community regarding the health of…

Health
3
Children's Specialty Group Inc

The mission of children's specialty group, inc. ("csg") is to provide the highest quality specialty health care services to infants, children and adolescents and to advance the effectiveness of health care through education and the…

Health
4
Center for Healthcare Careers of Southeast Wisconsin Inc

The mission of the center for healthcare careers of southeast wisconsin, inc. (chcsew) is to unite all appropriate stakeholders in a viable, flexible structure to locate, educate and support a workforce from service to professional levels…

Health
5
Prohealth Medical Group Inc

Continously improving the health of our community.

Health
6
Children's Hospital of Wisconsin Inc

Children's wisconsin, provides a comprehensive and integrated pediatric health care model that delivers superior quality and value by offering the best solution for the total health care needs of children within our community, state and…

Health
7
Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare - Foundation for St Francis and Franklin Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

8
Prohealth Waukesha Memorial Hospital Inc

Continuously improving the health of our community.

Health
9
Pediatric Physician Services Inc

The corporation is organized for charitable, educational and scientific purposes, and to provide healthcare services of pediatric specialty physicians and other personnel to the patients of johns hopkins all children's hospital and…

10
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
11
Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare - Southeast Wisconsin Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable. our catholic health ministry is dedicated to spiritually-centered, holistic care…

Health
12
Mental Health Emergency Center Inc

Mhec provides emergency crisis care that is patient-centered, recovery-orientated and culturally informed.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Froedtert Menomonee Falls Hospital Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Joseph Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BREAD OF HEALING INC — $106,940 · HealthBREAD OF HEALING INCCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC — $70,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUND…PENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $59,635 · HealthPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INCFroedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital Inc — $30,000 · HealthFroedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital I…ASCENSION SETON DENTAL CLINIC — $71,940 · OtherASCENSION SETON DENTAL CLINICCHILDREN WISCONSIN FOUNDATION — $61,567 · OtherCHILDREN WISCONSIN FOUNDATIONASCENSION ST BEN CLINIC — $36,940 · OtherASCENSION ST BEN CLINICASCENSION ST BEN'S CLINIC — $35,000 · OtherASCENSION ST BEN'S CLINICWOMEN'S CARE CENTER — $25,000 · OtherWOMEN'S CARE CENTERIndividual grant recipient — $24,635 · OtherIndividual grant recipientASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 · PhilanthropyASCENSION WISCONSIN F…CHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC — $58,500 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA C…Froedtert Menomonee Falls Hospital Foundation Inc — $27,500 · PhilanthropyFroedtert Menomonee F…+1 more — $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $111,054 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COL…ST JOSEPH ACADEMY INC — $5,000 · Human Services
Health$267,075Other$255,082Philanthropy$151,000Education$111,054Human Services$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $111,054 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBREAD OF HEALING INC — $106,940 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC — $70,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC — $59,635 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC — $58,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFroedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital Inc — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFroedtert Menomonee Falls Hospital Foundation Inc — $27,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetST JOSEPH ACADEMY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds BREAD OF HEALING INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ASCENSION WISCONSIN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PENFIELD CHILDREN'S CENTER INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DYSLEXIA CENTERS INC
  • Who funds Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital Inc
  • Who funds Froedtert Menomonee Falls Hospital Foundation Inc
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds AURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Herbert H Kohl Charities IncWI15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Berghammer Construction Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization A Keenan Tr Matthew Keenan End Fd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph