Skip to content

· Private foundation

A H Gage Private Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$99kHealth$42kReligion$25kHuman Services$24kEnvironment$24kFood & Nutrition$22kPublic Safety & Disaster$21kScience & Tech$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,700
Median grant
6
States reached
$741k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICARES$4,700
Individual grant recipient$4,700
Individual grant recipient$4,700
MERCY CORPS$4,700
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$4,700
CORVALLIS DAYTIME DROP IN CENTER$4,700
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$4,700
HOPE FOR HAITI$4,700
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$4,700
SOUTH CORVALLIS FOOD BANK$4,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BORDER ANGELS: $5k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $750 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
OR
OH
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$297k · 18 repeat orgs$89k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
28

Total granted

$297k
$84k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+19%

Still filing today

33%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEnvironmentHealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OCEAN CONSERVANCY
    6× · 2019–2025 · $18k · revenue +58%
  • SC
    SOUTH CORVALLIS FOOD BANK
    3× · 2023–2025 · $14k · revenue +180%
  • HH
    HAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • IR
    INDIAN RIVER VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue -32%
  • GL
    GREENBELT LAND TRUST
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -58%
  • PC
    PROJECT CURE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.": - count it: our work is…

International
2
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
3
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
4
Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

Environment
5
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
6
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
7
International Medical Corps

To save lives & relieve suffering through health interventions & related activities that strengthen communities affected by conflict, natural disasters & disease outbreaks.

International
8
Amazon Conservation Team

The amazon conservation team (act) partners with indigenous and other local communities to protect tropical forests and strengthen traditional culture.

Science & Tech
9
Health in Harmony

Health in Harmony's mission is to reverse tropical rainforest deforestation for planetary health.

Health
10
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
11
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
12
Rights and Resources Institute Inc

Rri's mission is to support local communities and indigenous peoples' struggles against poverty and marginalization by promoting greater global commitment and action towards policy, market, and legal reforms that secure their rights to…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope for Haiti Inc; the most unlike its peers is Corvallis Daytime Drop-in Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
16/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $34,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICARES: $31,900 · OtherAMERICARESPARTNERS IN HEALTH: $28,900 · OtherPARTNERS IN HEALTHMERCY CORPS: $27,900 · OtherMERCY CORPSSCVIM: $20,000 · OtherSCVIMIndividual grant recipient: $19,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+16 more: $49,950 · Other+16 moreHOPE FOR HAITI INC: $24,400 · InternationalHOPE FOR HAITI INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $19,400 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN IN…HAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10,000 · InternationalHAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATIO…GRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA: $5,250 · InternationalGRAMEEN FOUNDATION USAInternational Rescue Committee INC: $4,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 · InternationalFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,000 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $3,500 · InternationalLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $3,500 · International+1 more: $750 · InternationalOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $18,400 · EnvironmentGREENBELT LAND TRUST: $5,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,500 · Environment+1 more: $750 · EnvironmentINDIAN RIVER VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC: $12,500 · HealthCORVALLIS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER: $4,700 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $750 · HealthSOUTH CORVALLIS FOOD BANK: $14,400 · Food & NutritionBORDER ANGELS: $5,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $750 · Human ServicesREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $5,000 · Civil RightsCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $500 · Civil Rights
Other$233,450International$82,800Environment$25,650Health$17,950Food & Nutrition$14,400Human Services$5,750Civil Rights$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOPE FOR HAITI INC: $24,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $19,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $18,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH CORVALLIS FOOD BANK: $14,400 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetINDIAN RIVER VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA: $5,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREENBELT LAND TRUST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT CURE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBORDER ANGELS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORVALLIS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER: $4,700 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHINTIMINI WILDLIFE CENTER: $4,700 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFINCA INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEarthworks: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOPE FOR HAITI INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH CORVALLIS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds INDIAN RIVER VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC ↗
  • Who funds HAITIAN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds GREENBELT LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT CURE INC ↗
  • Who funds BORDER ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds CORVALLIS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHINTIMINI WILDLIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds FINCA INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN WORLD RELIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY10.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization A H Gage Private Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from A H Gage Private Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Lutheran World Relief Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Greenbelt Land Trust: 31% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Hope for Haiti Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on A H Gage Private’s filings →

More from the funding graph