Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

A Gift From Rachel Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2022
9
Grants FY2022
8
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Health$28kInternational$18kHuman Services$5kHousing & Shelter$5kPhilanthropy$4kEducation$3kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2022 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The National Meningitis Association Inc$1,500
Meningitas Foundation of America Inc$1,050
Direct Relief$750
Samaritans Purse$600
Seattle Childrens Hospital$500
World Vision$500
United Way Worldwide$500
Autism Speaks$250
The Bible Project$220
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Good Karma Bikes: $500 → 8%Family Promise of Hawaii: $2k → 9%Good Karma Bikes: $250 → 8%Good Karma Bikes: $200 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MI
NY
OR
CA
VA
AZ
NC
HI
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$53k · 12 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$53k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+367%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
ReligionHealthHuman ServicesInternationalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $7k · revenue +134%
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    5× · 2017–2022 · $5k · revenue +94%
  • VC
    VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS
    5× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • TE
    THE EMILY STILLMAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue -64%
  • FP
    FAMILY PROMISE OF HAWAIIgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +367%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

2
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
3
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

4
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
5
Bloodwater Mission Inc

Bloodwater mission, inc. (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization registered in nashville, tennessee that operates an international nonprofit that partners with african community-driven organizations to end water and hiv/aids…

Religion
6
Mission Mutual

Equipping mission, ministry, and philanthropic organizations (of similar vision) with the organizational and relational perspective needed to accelerate and enhance their collective impact. mission mutual exists to provide centralized…

International
7
Global Voice
8
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
9
Global Poverty Project Inc

Our mission is to build a movement of global citizens whose actions will help achieve our vision of a world without extreme poverty.

Social Science
10
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

11
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
12
Blue Letter Bible

The specific purpose of this corporation is to present a biblical, christian ministry of the gospel, hope, encouragement and strength to as many people as possible. the intent of those who will conduct this corporation's work is to present…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc and the most unlike its peers is National Meningitis Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

National Meningitis Association Inc — $11,775 · OtherNational Meningitis Association IncMeningitas Foundation of America Inc — $6,150 · OtherMeningitas Foundation of America IncSeattle Childrens — $3,900 · OtherSeattle ChildrensIndividual grant recipient — $3,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCamp Unity Eastside — $3,000 · OtherCamp Unity EastsideMENINGITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC — $2,800 · OtherMENINGITIS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC+1 more — $500 · OtherDIRECT RELIEF — $5,400 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFWORLD VISION INC — $5,138 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $7,100 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PUR…BIBLEPROJECT — $2,105 · ReligionBIBLEPROJECTAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $3,125 · HealthAUTISM SP…THE EMILY STILLMAN FOUNDATION — $2,500 · HealthTHE EMILY…UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE — $3,850 · PhilanthropyVALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS — $3,450 · EducationFAMILY PROMISE OF HAWAII — $1,500 · Human ServicesGOOD KARMA BIKES INC — $950 · Human Services
Other$31,225International$10,538Religion$9,205Health$5,625Philanthropy$3,850Education$3,450Human Services$2,450

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNational Meningitis Association Inc — $11,775 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $7,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $5,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $5,138 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE — $3,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS — $3,450 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $3,125 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Unity Eastside — $3,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetTHE EMILY STILLMAN FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBIBLEPROJECT — $2,105 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF HAWAII — $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGOOD KARMA BIKES INC — $950 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds National Meningitis Association Inc
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE
  • Who funds VALLEY CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC
  • Who funds Camp Unity Eastside
  • Who funds THE EMILY STILLMAN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BIBLEPROJECT
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF HAWAII
  • Who funds GOOD KARMA BIKES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization A Gift From Rachel Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph