Skip to content
A Chudnow & Sons Historical Museum Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

A Chudnow & Sons Historical Museum Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$361k
Granted FY2022
47
Grants FY2022
16
States reached
$92k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2022.

Arts & Culture$884kPhilanthropy$154kEducation$84kInternational$41kHuman Services$26kHealth$25kReligion$18kRecreation & Sports$13kOther$0
02FY2022 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k40 grants · $167k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $102k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $92k
$5,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$92,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION$27,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND ADI NEGEV$25,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND TIMNA PARK$20,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID$10,000
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$10,000
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$10,000
JEWISH HOME & CARE CENTER FOUNDATION$8,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$7,500
USC ADVANCEMENT GIFT SERVICES$7,500
AUTISM SPEAKS INC$5,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND TIMNA VALLEY$5,000
ARAVA INSTITUTE$5,000
UNICEF USA$5,000
FRIENDS IN SERVICE HELPING$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH HOME & CARE CENTER FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
NV
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
University of Judaism Foundation
—
3
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
4
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
5
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
6
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
7
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
8
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
9
Sherit Isroel
—
10
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
11
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
12
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Metrowest Nj; the most unlike its peers is Between Horses and Humans. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
18/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CEDARBURG LANDMARK PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC: $869,405 · Arts & CultureCEDARBURG LANDMARK PRESERVATION SOCIETY INC+1 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $92,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUN…JEWISH NATIONAL FUND ADI NEGEV: $25,000 · OtherJEWISH NATIONAL FUND …JEWISH NATIONAL FUND TIMNA PARK: $20,000 · OtherJEWISH NATIONAL FUND …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID: $10,000 · Other+23 more: $95,500 · Other+23 moreAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $36,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $7,500 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $5,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC: $5,000 · InternationalCentral Fund of Israel: $5,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $5,000 · International+1 more: $2,000 · InternationalUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $27,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $7,500 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC: $2,000 · EducationAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $5,000 · HealthNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $5,000 · HealthBIKUR CHOLIM: $3,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,000 · HealthJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ: $5,000 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyBetween Horses and Humans: $2,500 · PhilanthropyNorthwestern University: $10,000 · Recreation & Sports
Arts & Culture$879,405Other$242,500International$70,500Education$38,500Health$15,000Philanthropy$10,500Recreation & Sports$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Friends of Tel Aviv Univ: $36,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $27,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HOME AND CARE CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAwaken INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY-MARINE CORPS RELIEF SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METROWEST NJ: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBetween Horses and Humans: $2,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization A Chudnow & Sons Historical Museum Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from A Chudnow & Sons Historical Museum Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to A Chudnow & Sons Historical Museum Inc?

    Find your warmest path to A Chudnow & Sons Historical Museum Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on A Chudnow & Sons Historical Museum’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home