· Public charity
4-Ct Corp
Partner with community-based organizations across connecticut to empower individuals in need to improve their lives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1 grants below total $10,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $470,991 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $460,991 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NEWHALLVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD CORPORATION (NCC) | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
None of your grants could be placed against low income need for this view.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCOMUNIDAD HISPANA DE WALLINGFORD3× · 2021–2023 · $52k · revenue +18%
- JFJUNTA FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION INC2× · 2021–2022 · $29k · revenue +14%
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ARCHDIOCESE OF HARTFORD2× · 2022–2023 · $29k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- CDConnecticut Dept of Economic and Comm Devone grant, 2021 · $100k
- IRINTEGRATED REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICESgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +134%
- AOANGEL OF EDGEWOOD INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $17k · revenue +790%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Community action agency of new haven, inc. offers pathways to prosperity to those in poverty in the greater new haven area through: service - collaboration - advocacy - knowledge generation.
The connecticut housing coalition works to expand housing opportunity and to increase the quantity and quality of affordable housing available to people with low and moderate incomes in connecticut through advocacy, education and…
The mission of the connecticut association for community action is to strengthen the capacities of its members to empower people in need and improve the communities in which they live.
We encourage Connecticut residents to participate in government and their communities and we conduct public interest lobbying to advocate for consumer and environmental concerns.
To advance excellence in community-based nonprofits in connecticut.
Empower a statewide network of caring, consistent volunteer court appointed special advocates to advance the best interests of children who have experienced abuse or neglect so every child can find a safe, permanent home to thrive.
Eastern connecticut housing opportunities, inc. is a non-profit organization organized to provide affordable housing to low-income families of southeastern connecticut.
To foster collaborations to ensure a highly educated, diverse and sustainable nursing workforce to support the healthcare needs of connecticut residents.
To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.
To compete aggressively and successfully for jobs, talent and capital.
Open communities alliance is a connecticut-based civil rights organization that promotes access to opportunity for all people through education, organizing, advocacy, research and partnerships.
Providing programs and services to city of Hartford and its surrounding communities
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Opportunities Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hispanic Alliance of Southeastern Connecticut Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEW OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds COMUNIDAD HISPANA DE WALLINGFORD ↗
- Who funds JUNTA FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ARCHDIOCESE OF HARTFORD ↗
- Who funds INTEGRATED REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ANGEL OF EDGEWOOD INC ↗
- Who funds Hispanic Alliance of Southeastern Connecticut Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FREE CLINICS INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT INSTITUTE FOR REFUGEES AND IMMIGRANTS INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT INC ↗
- Who funds BUILDING ONE COMMUNITY CORP ↗
- Who funds THAMES VALLEY COUNCIL FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Connecticut Health Foundation Inc · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Fairfield County's Community Foundation Inc · Hispanic Federation Inc · Connecticut Association for Community Action Inc · The Scripps Family Fund for Education and the Arts · New Canaan Community Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization 4-Ct Corp funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Alliance for Community Empowerment Inc — 100% of income from government
- Angel of Edgewood Inc — 100% of income from government
- Thames Valley Council for Community Action Inc — 83% of income from government
- The Community Action Agency of Western Connecticut Inc — 81% of income from government
- New Opportunities Inc — 70% of income from government
- Catholic Charities Inc Archdiocese of Hartford — 39% of income from government
- Comunidad Hispana De Wallingford — 38% of income from government
- Integrated Refugee and Immigrant Services — 37% of income from government
- Connecticut Institute for Refugees and Immigrants Inc — 37% of income from government
- Junta for Progressive Action Inc — 35% of income from government
- Community Health Center Inc — 10% of income from government
- Hispanic Alliance of Southeastern Connecticut Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.