Skip to content
2030 Foundation of Topeka Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

2030 Foundation of Topeka Inc

Solicit, collect, manage, and/or distribute charitable funds for the use or benefit of children located in and around Topeka, KS.

$158k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Health$88kHuman Services$75kPhilanthropy$61kReligion$36kFood & Nutrition$30kYouth Development$21kAnimals$6k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $34,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $158,157 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $123,657 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Topeka Community Foundation$10,000
Birthright of Topeka Inc$7,000
The DK Impact$6,000
Team Blake Foundation$6,000
Sole Reason Foundation$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Sole Reason Foundation: $15k → 14%Sole Reason Foundation: $10k → 14%Sole Reason Foundation: $6k → 14%TARC Inc: $24k → 14%TARC Inc: $10k → 14%Florence Crittenton Services of Topeka: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of 2030 Foundation of Topeka Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in KS; by stated purpose, 0%.

2030 Foundation of Topeka Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$210k · 8 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$210k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
0%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    Team Blake Foundation
    3× · 2023–2025 · $38k · revenue +22% · 27% of their budget
  • TI
    TARC INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $34k · revenue +3%
  • BO
    BIRTHRIGHT OF TOPEKA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • FH
    FELLOWSHIP HI-CREST INC
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue -3%
  • CF
    CAPPER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +25%
  • FC
    Florence Crittenton Services of Topeka Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bridge of Topeka Inc

To empower at risk youth to be servant leaders

Youth Development
2
Cornerstone of Topeka Inc

All of Cornerstone efforts are directed toward interrupting the cycle of homelessness, providing decent, safe, accessible and affordable housing of choice to moderate and low-income households, and revitalizing Topeka neighborhoods.

Housing & Shelter
3
Topeka Rescue Mission Inc

The topeka rescue mission is dedicated to helping the homeless and hungry by providing emergency shelter to approximately 2,000 men, women and children and serving over 400,000 meals annually. trm provides a christian social service…

Housing & Shelter
4
The Topeka Public Schools Foundation

To enhance educational opportunities for all students through a partnership of our community and its public schools.

—
5
Greater Topeka Partnership Foundation

To provide sources of charitable support and provide funding for the establishment or support of educational, employment, economic and training opportunities designed to provide relief of the poor, distressed and underprivileged as well as…

Community Improvement
6
Tarc Foundation

The purpose of the foundation is to ensure a strong financial base through active community involvement in order to support tarc, inc's mission of enhancing the lives of people affected by developmental and related disabilities through…

Health
7
Topeka Center for Peace & Juctice

The mission of the topeka center for peace and justice is to serve as a community resource to promote peace and justice using restorative principles

—
8
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
9
Tipton Christian School

Education and instruction for grades k-6th

Education
10
Disability Rights Center of Kansas Inc

Zealously advocating for the disability rights of kansans to protect their full participation as citizens.

Civil Rights
11
Bike Share Kc

Bike share kc provides the greater kansas city area with a bike share system designed for transportation, recreation, and exercise.

Human Services
12
Topeka Collegiate School Inc

To prepare students for advanced education, successful careers and responsible citizenship through academic excellence and humanitarian ideals.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Topeka Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Sole Reason Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BIRTHRIGHT OF TOPEKA INC: $20,000 · OtherBIRTHRIGHT OF TOPEKA INCCOMMUNITY RESOURCES COUNCIL INC: $17,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY RESOURCES COUNCI…KANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $15,000 · OtherKANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SI…CAPPER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherCAPPER FOUNDATIONTHEDKIMPACT: $6,000 · OtherTHEDKIMPACTPRAIRIELAND VISITING ANIMALS ASSOCIATION: $6,000 · OtherPRAIRIELAND VISITING ANIMA…TARC INC: $34,020 · Human ServicesTARC INCSOLE REASON FOUNDATION: $30,500 · Human ServicesSOLE REASON FOUNDATIONFlorence Crittenton Services of Topeka Inc: $7,500 · Human ServicesFlorence Crittenton Servi…TOPEKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $60,514 · PhilanthropyTOPEKA COMMUNITY FOUN…Team Blake Foundation: $38,000 · HealthTeam Blake Fo…TOPEKA NORTH OUTREACH INC: $25,000 · ReligionTOPEKA NORTH…FELLOWSHIP HI-CREST INC: $11,000 · ReligionFELLOWSHIP H…PROJECT TOPEKA FOOD DRIVE: $30,000 · Food & NutritionPROJECT TO…GREATER TOPEKA YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $5,825 · Youth Development
Other$74,000Human Services$72,020Philanthropy$60,514Health$38,000Religion$36,000Food & Nutrition$30,000Youth Development$5,825

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTOPEKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $60,514 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTeam Blake Foundation: $38,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetTARC INC: $34,020 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOLE REASON FOUNDATION: $30,500 over 3y, 15% of budgetPROJECT TOPEKA FOOD DRIVE: $30,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetTOPEKA NORTH OUTREACH INC: $25,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT OF TOPEKA INC: $20,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCES COUNCIL INC: $17,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetKANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP HI-CREST INC: $11,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCAPPER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFlorence Crittenton Services of Topeka Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER TOPEKA YOUTH FOUNDATION INC: $5,825 over 1y, 3.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Topeka Community Foun…Amazonsmile Foundation
Topeka Community FoundationKS26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Topeka Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 2030 Foundation of Topeka Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 2030 Foundation of Topeka Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 2030 Foundation of Topeka’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home