Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

2030 Foundation of Topeka Inc

Solicit, collect, manage, and/or distribute charitable funds for the use or benefit of children located in and around Topeka, KS.

$158k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20232025.

Health$88kHuman Services$75kPhilanthropy$61kReligion$36kFood & Nutrition$30kYouth Development$21kAnimals$6k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $34,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $158,157 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $123,657 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Topeka Community Foundation$10,000
Birthright of Topeka Inc$7,000
Team Blake Foundation$6,000
The DK Impact$6,000
Sole Reason Foundation$5,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Sole Reason Foundation: $15k → 14%Sole Reason Foundation: $10k → 14%Sole Reason Foundation: $6k → 14%TARC Inc: $24k → 14%TARC Inc: $10k → 14%Florence Crittenton Services of Topeka: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of 2030 Foundation of Topeka Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in KS; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

2030 Foundation of Topeka Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$210k · 8 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$210k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
0%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    Team Blake Foundation
    3× · 2023–2025 · $38k · revenue +22% · 27% of their budget
  • TI
    TARC INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $34k · revenue +1%
  • BO
    BIRTHRIGHT OF TOPEKA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • FH
    FELLOWSHIP HI-CREST INC
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue -3%
  • CF
    CAPPER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +25%
  • FC
    Florence Crittenton Services of Topeka Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bridge of Topeka Inc

To empower at risk youth to be servant leaders

Youth Development
2
Cornerstone of Topeka Inc

All of Cornerstone efforts are directed toward interrupting the cycle of homelessness, providing decent, safe, accessible and affordable housing of choice to moderate and low-income households, and revitalizing Topeka neighborhoods.

Housing & Shelter
3
Topeka Rescue Mission Inc

The topeka rescue mission is dedicated to helping the homeless and hungry by providing emergency shelter to approximately 2,000 men, women and children and serving over 400,000 meals annually. trm provides a christian social service…

Housing & Shelter
4
The Topeka Public Schools Foundation

To enhance educational opportunities for all students through a partnership of our community and its public schools.

5
Greater Topeka Partnership Foundation

To provide sources of charitable support and provide funding for the establishment or support of educational, employment, economic and training opportunities designed to provide relief of the poor, distressed and underprivileged as well as…

Community Improvement
6
Tarc Foundation

The purpose of the foundation is to ensure a strong financial base through active community involvement in order to support tarc, inc's mission of enhancing the lives of people affected by developmental and related disabilities through…

Health
7
Topeka Center for Peace & Juctice

The mission of the topeka center for peace and justice is to serve as a community resource to promote peace and justice using restorative principles

8
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
9
Tipton Christian School

Education and instruction for grades k-6th

Education
10
Disability Rights Center of Kansas Inc

Zealously advocating for the disability rights of kansans to protect their full participation as citizens.

Civil Rights
11
Bike Share Kc

Bike share kc provides the greater kansas city area with a bike share system designed for transportation, recreation, and exercise.

Human Services
12
Topeka Collegiate School Inc

To prepare students for advanced education, successful careers and responsible citizenship through academic excellence and humanitarian ideals.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Topeka Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Sole Reason Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BIRTHRIGHT OF TOPEKA INC — $20,000 · OtherBIRTHRIGHT OF TOPEKA INCCOMMUNITY RESOURCES COUNCIL INC — $17,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY RESOURCES COUNCI…KANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC — $15,000 · OtherKANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SI…CAPPER FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherCAPPER FOUNDATIONTHEDKIMPACT — $6,000 · OtherTHEDKIMPACTPRAIRIELAND VISITING ANIMALS ASSOCIATION — $6,000 · OtherPRAIRIELAND VISITING ANIMA…TARC INC — $34,020 · Human ServicesTARC INCSOLE REASON FOUNDATION — $30,500 · Human ServicesSOLE REASON FOUNDATIONFlorence Crittenton Services of Topeka Inc — $7,500 · Human ServicesFlorence Crittenton Servi…TOPEKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $60,514 · PhilanthropyTOPEKA COMMUNITY FOUN…Team Blake Foundation — $38,000 · HealthTeam Blake Fo…TOPEKA NORTH OUTREACH INC — $25,000 · ReligionTOPEKA NORTH…FELLOWSHIP HI-CREST INC — $11,000 · ReligionFELLOWSHIP H…PROJECT TOPEKA FOOD DRIVE — $30,000 · Food & NutritionPROJECT TO…GREATER TOPEKA YOUTH FOUNDATION INC — $5,825 · Youth Development
Other$74,000Human Services$72,020Philanthropy$60,514Health$38,000Religion$36,000Food & Nutrition$30,000Youth Development$5,825

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTOPEKA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $60,514 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTeam Blake Foundation — $38,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetTARC INC — $34,020 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOLE REASON FOUNDATION — $30,500 over 3y, 15% of budgetPROJECT TOPEKA FOOD DRIVE — $30,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetTOPEKA NORTH OUTREACH INC — $25,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT OF TOPEKA INC — $20,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCES COUNCIL INC — $17,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetKANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP HI-CREST INC — $11,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCAPPER FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFlorence Crittenton Services of Topeka Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER TOPEKA YOUTH FOUNDATION INC — $5,825 over 1y, 3.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Topeka Community FoundationKS26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Topeka Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization 2030 Foundation of Topeka Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph