Skip to content

· Public charity

100x Development Foundation

100X DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION exists to glorify god through the care of orphans and the sharing of the good news of christ around the world.

$690k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$260k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$285kEducation$223kHuman Services$216kReligion$60kInternational$54k
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $495,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $690,100 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $195,100 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $170k
  • $250k+1 grant · $260k
$60,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HARBOR$260,000
NORFOLK SCHOOLS OF MALAWI$60,000
LANDMARK CHURCH OF CHRIST$60,000
UMBC FOUNDATION$50,000
ADULLUM HOUSE$40,000
CHIKONDI HEALTH FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $191k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%FREEDOM RAIN DBA THE LOVELADY CENTER: $191k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $195k on the FY2023 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$195k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CONSTRUCTION OF ORPHAN HOMES, ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT, ORPHAN SUPPORT, FOOD AND MEDICAL RELIEF

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
5/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LANDMARK CHURCH OF CHRIST: $60,000 · OtherLANDMARK CHURCH OF CHRISTNORFOLK SCHOOLS IN MALAWI INC: $60,000 · OtherNORFOLK SCHOOLS IN MALAWI INCMISSIONARY FUND: $53,757 · OtherMISSIONARY FUNDUMBC FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherUMBC FOUNDATIONSCHOLARSHIP FUND: $47,988 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP FUNDADULLAM INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $40,000 · OtherADULLAM INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIESCHILDREN'S HARBOR INC: $260,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HARBOR INCChikondi Health Foundation: $25,000 · HealthChikondi Health FoundationFREEDOM RAIN INC: $191,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM RAIN INCHOUSE TO HOUSE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $25,370 · Housing & ShelterVALIANT CROSS ACADEMY: $25,000 · Education
Other$311,745Health$285,000Human Services$191,000Housing & Shelter$25,370Education$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HARBOR INC: $260,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetFREEDOM RAIN INC: $191,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetHOUSE TO HOUSE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $25,370 over 1y, 13% of budgetChikondi Health Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM RAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE TO HOUSE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds VALIANT CROSS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Chikondi Health Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 100x Development Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 100x Development Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to 100x Development Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to 100x Development Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 100x Development’s filings →

    More from the funding graph