· Public charity
100 Black Men of America Inc
The mission of the 100 Black Men of America, Inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 48 grants below total $906,452 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,053,486 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $147,034 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $63k
- $10k–50k36 grants · $717k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $126k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| 100 BMO SOUTH FLORIDA | $70,600 |
| 100 BMO ATLANTA INCV | $55,000 |
| 100 BMO GREATER KANSAS | $45,100 |
| 100 BMO METRO BATON ROUGE INC | $37,500 |
| 100 BMO CENTRAL VIRGINIA | $36,500 |
| 100 BMO SAVANNAH INC | $30,000 |
| 100 BMO METRO ST LOUIS INC | $30,000 |
| 100 BMO SOUTH METRO ATLANTA | $30,000 |
| 100 BMO MADISON INC | $26,000 |
| 100 BMO MILLEDGEVILLE | $26,000 |
| 100 BMO AUSTIN INC | $26,000 |
| 100 BMO GREATER DALLAS | $25,954 |
| 100 BMO LAS VEGAS INC | $25,700 |
| 100 BMO PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY INC | $23,600 |
| 100 BMO METRO HOUSTON INC | $21,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $359k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
54 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $257k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- 1B100 Black Men of Metropolitan Houston5× · 2018–2025 · $260k · revenue +138% · 35% of their budget
- 1B100 BLACK MEN OF MADISON INC5× · 2018–2025 · $220k · revenue +89% · 31% of their budget
ONE HUNDRED BLACK MEN INC5× · 2018–2025 · $200k · revenue +21%
Funded once
- 1B100 BMO LONG ISLAND INCone grant, 2018 · $46k
- 1B100 Black Men of Augusta Incone grant, 2021 · $35k · revenue +12% · 29% of their budget
- 1B100 BLACK MEN OF GREATER ORLANDOone grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide scholarships and other educational assistance to students
Providing mentoring and education assistance to youth within St. Mary Parish, Louisiana
Provide mentoring/education
The mission of 100 black men of greater huntsville is to improve the quality of life within our communities and enhance economic and educational opportunities for at-risk youth.
Mentoring young men
The mission of the 100 Black Men of America, Inc. is to improve the quality of life within our communities and enhance educational and economic opportunities.
Mentorship of young Black men
The mission of the 100 Black Men of Greater Cleveland, Inc. is to improve the quality of life within our communities and enhance educational and economic opportunities for all African American youth through mentoring across four pillars:…
To Provide Scholarship help for minority students
Young men mentorship
Mentor Young Men
The 100 Black men of the Inland Empire Inc mission is provide youth with mentoring, Education, Health and Wellness and Economic empowerment
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 100 Black Men and the most unlike its peers is Triangle East Chapter 100 Black Men of America Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds 100 Black Men of Metropolitan Houston ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF MADISON INC ↗
- Who funds ONE HUNDRED BLACK MEN INC ↗
- Who funds 100 Black Men of Atlanta INC ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF SOUTH METRO INC ↗
- Who funds Triangle East Chapter 100 Black Men of America Inc ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF METROPOLITAN BATON ROUGE LTD ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF GREATER DETROIT INC ↗
- Who funds DEKALB CO CHAPTER OF 100 BLACK MEN ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF NORTH METRO ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF GREATER WASHINGTON DC ↗
- Who funds 100 Black Men of the Philadelphia Region Inc ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF GREATER COLUMBIA INC ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF SAVANNAH INC ↗
- Who funds 100 Black Men of Charlotte Inc ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF LAS VEGAS INC ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF CHICAGO INC ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN GREATER MOBILE INC ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF INDIANAPOLIS INC ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF GRENADA ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF SACRAMENTO INC ↗
- Who funds 100 Black Men of Jacksonville Inc ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF LONG BEACH INC ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF SYRACUSE INC ↗
- Who funds 100 BLACK MEN OF JACKSON INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Wells Fargo Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization 100 Black Men of America Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.