Skip to content
← Canadian charitiesAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Quebec · Registered charity

CANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHEKEL HAKODESH OF NEW SQUARE

CANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHEKEL HAKODESH OF NEW SQUARE (Quebec) receives grants from 20 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$460,736 to it, the largest being THE ALBERT & EGOSAH REICHMANN FAMILY FOUNDATION (C$142,760). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.

C$498k
Revenue FY2024
20
Funders on record
C$461k
Grants received
—
Net assets
11/20 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 35%

Against its field

CANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHEKEL HAKODESH OF NEW SQUARE has grown faster than half of the 1,075 support of schools and education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−2% · below the median
Months of reserve1.0mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)15% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,075 support of schools and education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$182k) Expenses 100 (C$179k)2018 Revenue 129 (C$234k) Expenses 142 (C$254k)2019 Revenue 123 (C$223k) Expenses 128 (C$229k)2020 Revenue 112 (C$204k) Expenses 85 (C$153k)2021 Revenue 122 (C$223k) Expenses 100 (C$180k)2022 Revenue 228 (C$415k) Expenses 297 (C$532k)2023 Revenue 259 (C$471k) Expenses 232 (C$416k)2024 Revenue 274 (C$498k) Expenses 283 (C$508k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (274)Expenses (283)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of CANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHEKEL HAKODESH OF NEW SQUARE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (40% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 956 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

C$3k
’17
−C$20k
’18
−C$6k
’19
C$51k
’20
C$43k
’21
−C$117k
’22
C$55k
’23
−C$10k
’24
1.0
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 6 funders to 8 funders, grant income rose C$40k → C$163k.

From the CRA filings of CANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHEKEL HAKODESH OF NEW SQUARE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHEKEL HAKODESH OF NEW SQUARE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 31% of grant income and the top three 64%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHEKEL HAKODESH OF NEW SQUARE.

31%
largest funder
64%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 60% · 2018 69% · 2019 44% · 2020 88% · 2021 39% · 2022 53% · 2023 61% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

33% of CANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHEKEL HAKODESH OF NEW SQUARE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 55% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

CANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHEKEL HAKODESH OF NEW SQUARE draws 58% of its grant income from funders outside Quebec, across 3 regions in all.

In-province vs out-of-province, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Quebec out of province

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 20 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like CANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHEKEL HAKODESH OF NEW SQUARE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Quebec

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

98% of spending goes to programs.

Program 98%Management 1%Fundraising 0%

Governance

4
board members

Questions and answers

Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHEKEL HAKODESH OF NEW SQUARE?
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHEKEL HAKODESH OF NEW SQUARE (Quebec) receives grants from 20 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$460,736 to it, the largest being THE ALBERT & EGOSAH REICHMANN FAMILY FOUNDATION (C$142,760). 11 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHEKEL HAKODESH OF NEW SQUARE have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 20 organizations giving C$460,736 in grants to CANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHEKEL HAKODESH OF NEW SQUARE, 11 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHEKEL HAKODESH OF NEW SQUARE?
THE ALBERT & EGOSAH REICHMANN FAMILY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with C$142,760 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CANADIAN FRIENDS OF SHEKEL HAKODESH OF NEW SQUARE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Quebec.

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 20 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register