Montreal, QC · Private foundation
The Fay Holocaust Life Foundation/ la Fondation de Vie de 'Holocauste Fay
The purpose of the foundation is to receive and maintain a fund for the following charitable purposes: 1.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- C$10k–50k1 grant · C$20k
- C$50k–250k2 grants · C$274k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CFO SHEFA CHAIM | C$205,183 |
| ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY (VMM) | C$68,989 |
| JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION MONTREAL | C$20,449 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$205k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- ZCZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY6× · 2018–2024 · C$461k · revenue +5%
- JHJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION MONTREAL2× · 2022–2024 · C$151k · revenue +27%
- VIVIZNITZ INSTITUTION2× · 2018–2022 · C$118k · revenue +270%
Funded once
- JCJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION MONTREALgraduatedone grant, 2021 · C$3.1M · revenue +97%
- FFFISCHMAN FAMILY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · C$1.2M · revenue -21% · 63% of their budget
- SSSHMILU & SARI ROSENBERGone grant, 2021 · C$1.2M · revenue -70% · 95% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
Support of jewish education and institutions
The charity collected funds from the public for the purpose of providing scholarships for deserving students attending haichel hatorah b'zion institutions.
The foundation donates funds to charitable religious organisations and educational institutions.
Administered the charitable activities of the zolty family and others for the advancement of education and jewish religion and loans to the needy.
To make donations to charitable organizations
Solicitation of donations
Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.
To relieve poverty by providing reasonable financial means for food shelter and other supplies or services to needy persons in israel
Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.
During the fiscal period, the organization accepted funds which were dispersed as scholarships to deserving students and to sholars doing research to be used in the study of judaism.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congrégation Reshith Chochma Première Mesifta du Canada / Congregation Reshith Chochma First Mesifta of Canada and the most unlike its peers is Congrégation Skver. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds FISCHMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHMILU & SARI ROSENBERG ↗
- Who funds CFO SANZ INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY ↗
- Who funds CFO SHEFA CHAIM ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds VIZNITZ INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds MCB ↗
- Who funds Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal ↗
- Who funds FIRST MESIVTA ↗
- Who funds FIRST MESTIFTA HUTCHISON BRANCH ↗
- Who funds Chasdei Shlomo ↗
- Who funds KOLEL BELZ ↗
- Who funds CONG. BELA ↗
- Who funds YAM HETALMUD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Congregation Skver ↗
- Who funds MANUCHA VESIMCHA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Maharam Tav Fund · The Micha Life Foundation la Fondation de Vie Micha · Fondation Ebs/Ebs Foundation · Fondation B'NAI LEVY / B'NAI LEVY Foundation · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Heitner Charitable Foundation · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Shmilu and Sari Rosenberg Foundation · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.