Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montréal, QC · Charitable organization

Nachlas Educational Centre

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to enable them to follow religious courses given at nachlas education centre distribute religious publication about jewish laws and cutsoms

C$13k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$12k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k4 grants · C$572
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$12k
C$180
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$502k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHAI CENTERC$12,320
CHABAD OF NDGC$192
CLYOC$180
CHABAD OF ST LAZAREC$100
CHABAD OF MILE ENDC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$292k · 19 repeat orgsC$16k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
5

Total granted

C$292k
C$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+182%

Still filing today

89%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$292 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HATZOLOS ARIZAL
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$207k · revenue +78%
  • CC
    CHAI CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$42k · revenue +86%
  • RC
    RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF QUEBEC
    2× · 2018–2019 · C$16k · revenue +174%

Funded once

  • RC
    RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF QUEBEC
    one grant, 2023 · C$15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · C$360
  • CA
    CONG ANASHgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$100 · revenue +178%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
2
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
3
Congregation Shir Chadash Inc

Operation of a jewish synagogue.

—
4
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
5
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
6
Shmuel Zahavy Cheder Chabad School

The charity operates a synagogue for all members of the community. the charity offers lectures and classes about the traditional heritage of judaism the state of israell and the richness of the hebrew language. the charity also maintains a…

—
7
Communauté Sepharade Hekhal Shalom

Synagogue

—
8
Fondation Sépharade Kollel Avrechim / Sephardic Kollel Avrechim foundation

Organiser et maintenir une synaguogue avec l'object de la pratique et l'avancement de la religion.

—
9
Association Chabad sur le Campus

Promotion of jewish culture and religion engage jewish students learning of culture

—
10
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
11
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
12
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre Chabad Chabanel and the most unlike its peers is Maharam Tav Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHATZOLOS ARIZAL — C$207,087 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCHAI CENTER — C$42,477 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetRABBINICAL COLLEGE OF QUEBEC — C$16,300 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetRabbinical College Canada — C$9,600 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCONGREGATION TZEIRI DAAS VLDAATH — C$5,514 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetCLYO — C$3,322 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCONGR. LUBAVITCH — C$1,154 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetONEG SHABBOS — C$1,090 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMESIVTA KEREN MENACHEM — C$850 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMONTREAL TORAH CENTER — C$636 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD ST LAZAR — C$500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCONGR. NUSACH ARI — C$490 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCHABAD OF THE AVENUE — C$438 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAHRAM TAV FUND — C$422 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETH RIVKAH — C$400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD OF NEWFOUNDLAND — C$218 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD CHABANEL — C$200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD OF NDG — C$192 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD OF MILE END — C$100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONG ANASH — C$100 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetMIFAL KLITA — C$72 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HATZOLOS ARIZAL ↗
  • Who funds CHAI CENTER ↗
  • Who funds RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF QUEBEC ↗
  • Who funds Rabbinical College Canada ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION TZEIRI DAAS VLDAATH ↗
  • Who funds CLYO ↗
  • Who funds CONGR. LUBAVITCH ↗
  • Who funds ONEG SHABBOS ↗
  • Who funds MESIVTA KEREN MENACHEM ↗
  • Who funds MONTREAL TORAH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD ST LAZAR ↗
  • Who funds CONGR. NUSACH ARI ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD OF THE AVENUE ↗
  • Who funds MAHRAM TAV FUND ↗
  • Who funds BETH RIVKAH ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD OF NEWFOUNDLAND ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD CHABANEL ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD OF NDG ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD OF MILE END ↗
  • Who funds CONG ANASH ↗
  • Who funds MIFAL KLITA ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chabad Chai Center / …Jewish Community Foun…Congregation de L'Aid…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Association Chabad su…Congregation Bais Men…Centre Chabad De Vill…Rayjo Charitable TrustMaharam Tav FundMy Charity FundLe Centre Chabad Vill…L'Organisation de la …
Chabad Chai Center / Centre Chabad ChaiQC16.7× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chabad Chai Center / Centre Chabad Chai · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Congregation de L'Aide Fraternelle Ezras Achim · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Association Chabad sur le Campus · Congregation Bais Menachem Chabad-Lubavitch · Centre Chabad De Ville Mont Royal Chabad Centre of The Town of Mount Royal · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Maharam Tav Fund · My Charity Fund · Le Centre Chabad Ville St-Laurent · L'Organisation de la jeunesse Chabad Loubavitch/Chabad Loubavitch Youth Organization

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of schools and education.

Source object 137144804:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Nachlas Educational Centre’s filings →