Skip to content

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Centre Chabad De Ville Mont Royal Chabad Centre of The Town of Mount Royal

To operate a synagogue.

C$141k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
Regions reached
C$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k17 grants · C$28k
  • C$10k–50k4 grants · C$113k
C$1,000
Median grant
5
Regions reached
C$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION A.R.E.EC$40,000
RABBINICAL COLLEGEC$34,610
BETH RIVKA ACADEMYC$28,000
JEWISH NIAGARAC$10,000
JPPS - BIALIKC$7,435
COMMUNAUTÉ CHABAD MONTRÉAL OUESTC$4,000
MENUCHA VESIMCHAC$3,545
THE FAMILY STOREC$3,000
CHABAD HOPE CENTERC$2,000
CHAI CENTERC$1,770
YAGDIL TORAHC$1,000
CHABAD MILE ENDC$1,000
CAMP JARDIN D'ISRAELC$1,000
CHABAD ST. LAZAREC$770
LA FONDATION LEVIC$500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$272k · 21 repeat orgsC$158k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
35

Total granted

C$272k
C$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+21%

Still filing today

90%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$57k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CONGREGATION ANSHEI YISROEL
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$69k · revenue +13%
  • RC
    RABBINICAL COLLEGE
    6× · 2018–2024 · C$63k · revenue +70%
  • BR
    BETH RIVKA ACADEMY
    5× · 2018–2024 · C$41k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • JR
    JEWISH RUSSIAN CHARITY FUND
    one grant, 2023 · C$36k · revenue -5% · 94% of their budget
  • CO
    CHABAD OF OLD MONTREAL
    one grant, 2021 · C$26k
  • CS
    CONGR. SHEVES ACHIMgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$7k · revenue +489%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
2
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
3
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
4
Congregation Shir Chadash Inc

Operation of a jewish synagogue.

—
5
Communauté Chabad de Mont-Tremblant

To operate a synagague and promote jewish religieus and moral and ethical values and practices

—
6
Fondation Sépharade Kollel Avrechim / Sephardic Kollel Avrechim foundation

Organiser et maintenir une synaguogue avec l'object de la pratique et l'avancement de la religion.

—
7
Organisation Chabad of Downtown Montreal Organisation Chabad De Centre Ville MontrÉAl

Providing religious programming including seminars and lectures. maintining a synagogue for daily religious services provide subsidized kosher meals for students. sponsoring social events that promote humanity. sponsoring social events…

—
8
Communauté Sepharade Hekhal Shalom

Synagogue

—
9
Chabad Latino MontrÉAl Community

To advance religion by teaching religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith by setting up jewish courses for men and women of all ages.

—
10
The Chabad Rehovot Fund
—
11
Chabad of Midtown

Fosters the study of traditional judaism through programmes directed at adults and children.

—
12
École Maimonide

École dont la vocation est la promotion de l'éducation religieuse

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre Chabad Chabanel and the most unlike its peers is Maison Belfield. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
43/43
Grantees still filing
28/43
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONGREGATION ANSHEI YISROEL — C$69,050 over 2y, 9.1% of budgetRABBINICAL COLLEGE — C$62,978 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetBETH RIVKA ACADEMY — C$41,050 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetFONDATION A.R.E.E — C$40,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetJEWISH RUSSIAN CHARITY FUND — C$36,000 over 1y, 94% of budgetMENUCHA VESIMCHA — C$31,670 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetJPPS - BIALIK — C$12,035 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCHAI CENTER — C$10,796 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH NIAGARA — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FAMILY STORE — C$9,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBETH CHABAD OF C.SL. — C$8,805 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCONGR. SHEVES ACHIM — C$6,700 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMADA COMMUNITY CENTER — C$5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNON PROFIT LOAN — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNAUTÉ CHABAD MONTRÉAL OUEST — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetQUALITY CHINUCH — C$3,854 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCHABAD ST LAZARE — C$3,080 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCHARITYEX FOUNDATION — C$2,760 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAHARAM TAV FUND — C$2,680 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAISON BELFIELD — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHABAD COTE DES NEIGES — C$1,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCHABAD MILE END — C$1,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGARDEN OF HANNAH CAMP (PARDAS CHANAH — C$1,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUB YESHIVA TORONTO — C$1,319 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCHABAD CHABANEL — C$1,143 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP JARDIN D'ISRAEL — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD OF NEWFOUNDLAD INC. — C$750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHABAD UNIVERSITE DE MONTREAL — C$680 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRE SEPHARADE DE TORA LAVAL — C$515 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHABAD NANAIMO — C$500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLA FONDATION LEVI — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHABAD OF REGINA — C$500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHABAD LUBAVITCH YOUTH ORG — C$430 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEZRAT TORAH FUND — C$400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOR MENACHEM — C$387 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH MAZAL CTR — C$360 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKOL MENACHEM — C$250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANADA HELPS — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD JEWISH CENTRE OF DORVAL — C$250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBEIS CHAYA ACADEMY — C$210 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCGILL CHILDCARE CTR — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORPORATION SPANISH AND PORTUGESE JEWS — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD CSL — C$100 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Federation CjaQC22.7× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Federation Cja · Chabad Chai Center / Centre Chabad Chai · L'Organisation de la jeunesse Chabad Loubavitch/Chabad Loubavitch Youth Organization · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Congregation Bais Menachem Chabad-Lubavitch · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Association Chabad sur le Campus · Organisation Chabad Westmount Westmount Chabad Organization · Congregation de L'Aide Fraternelle Ezras Achim · Le Centre Chabad Ville St-Laurent · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under judaism.

Source object 890808140:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Centre Chabad De Ville Mont Royal Chabad Centre of The Town of Mount Royal’s filings →