Montreal, QC · Charitable organization
Centre Chabad De Ville Mont Royal Chabad Centre of The Town of Mount Royal
To operate a synagogue.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k17 grants · C$28k
- C$10k–50k4 grants · C$113k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FONDATION A.R.E.E | C$40,000 |
| RABBINICAL COLLEGE | C$34,610 |
| BETH RIVKA ACADEMY | C$28,000 |
| JEWISH NIAGARA | C$10,000 |
| JPPS - BIALIK | C$7,435 |
| COMMUNAUTÉ CHABAD MONTRÉAL OUEST | C$4,000 |
| MENUCHA VESIMCHA | C$3,545 |
| THE FAMILY STORE | C$3,000 |
| CHABAD HOPE CENTER | C$2,000 |
| CHAI CENTER | C$1,770 |
| YAGDIL TORAH | C$1,000 |
| CHABAD MILE END | C$1,000 |
| CAMP JARDIN D'ISRAEL | C$1,000 |
| CHABAD ST. LAZARE | C$770 |
| LA FONDATION LEVI | C$500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
21 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$57k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CACONGREGATION ANSHEI YISROEL2× · 2021–2022 · C$69k · revenue +13%
- RCRABBINICAL COLLEGE6× · 2018–2024 · C$63k · revenue +70%
- BRBETH RIVKA ACADEMY5× · 2018–2024 · C$41k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- JRJEWISH RUSSIAN CHARITY FUNDone grant, 2023 · C$36k · revenue -5% · 94% of their budget
- COCHABAD OF OLD MONTREALone grant, 2021 · C$26k
- CSCONGR. SHEVES ACHIMgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$7k · revenue +489%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.
Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning
Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.
Operation of a jewish synagogue.
To operate a synagague and promote jewish religieus and moral and ethical values and practices
Organiser et maintenir une synaguogue avec l'object de la pratique et l'avancement de la religion.
Providing religious programming including seminars and lectures. maintining a synagogue for daily religious services provide subsidized kosher meals for students. sponsoring social events that promote humanity. sponsoring social events…
Synagogue
To advance religion by teaching religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith by setting up jewish courses for men and women of all ages.
Fosters the study of traditional judaism through programmes directed at adults and children.
École dont la vocation est la promotion de l'éducation religieuse
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre Chabad Chabanel and the most unlike its peers is Maison Belfield. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CONGREGATION ANSHEI YISROEL ↗
- Who funds RABBINICAL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds BETH RIVKA ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds FONDATION A.R.E.E ↗
- Who funds JEWISH RUSSIAN CHARITY FUND ↗
- Who funds MENUCHA VESIMCHA ↗
- Who funds JPPS - BIALIK ↗
- Who funds CHAI CENTER ↗
- Who funds JEWISH NIAGARA ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY STORE ↗
- Who funds BETH CHABAD OF C.SL. ↗
- Who funds CONGR. SHEVES ACHIM ↗
- Who funds MADA COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds NON PROFIT LOAN ↗
- Who funds COMMUNAUTÉ CHABAD MONTRÉAL OUEST ↗
- Who funds QUALITY CHINUCH ↗
- Who funds CHABAD ST LAZARE ↗
- Who funds CHARITYEX FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAHARAM TAV FUND ↗
- Who funds MAISON BELFIELD ↗
- Who funds CHABAD COTE DES NEIGES ↗
- Who funds CHABAD MILE END ↗
- Who funds GARDEN OF HANNAH CAMP (PARDAS CHANAH ↗
- Who funds LUB YESHIVA TORONTO ↗
- Who funds CHABAD CHABANEL ↗
- Who funds CAMP JARDIN D'ISRAEL ↗
- Who funds CHABAD OF NEWFOUNDLAD INC. ↗
- Who funds CHABAD UNIVERSITE DE MONTREAL ↗
- Who funds CENTRE SEPHARADE DE TORA LAVAL ↗
- Who funds CHABAD NANAIMO ↗
- Who funds LA FONDATION LEVI ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Federation Cja · Chabad Chai Center / Centre Chabad Chai · L'Organisation de la jeunesse Chabad Loubavitch/Chabad Loubavitch Youth Organization · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Congregation Bais Menachem Chabad-Lubavitch · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Association Chabad sur le Campus · Organisation Chabad Westmount Westmount Chabad Organization · Congregation de L'Aide Fraternelle Ezras Achim · Le Centre Chabad Ville St-Laurent · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.