Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Saint-Laurent, QC · Private foundation

Le Centre Chabad Ville St-Laurent

Operate a synagogue & provide educational activities & religious services

C$65k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$35k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k14 grants · C$19k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$46k
C$500
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$218k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BETH ORAC$35,456
MACHSON TZVI HERSHC$11,000
BETH RIVKAHC$6,128
CHABAD OF THE TOWNC$5,828
RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF CANADAC$4,085
CHABAD OF CENTERPOINTEC$1,200
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF KEREN HATZOLOHC$654
FONDATION DE L'ECOLE MAIMONIDEC$500
COMMUNAUTÉ SEPHARADE HEKHAL SHALOMC$202
SYNAGOGUE UN ARBRE DE VIE-OR MENACHEMC$125
CHABAD LASALLEC$56
CONGRÉGATION BETH CHABAD CSLC$50
ROHR CHABAD NDGC$49
INSTITUT YAVNEC$36
KOLLEL MENACHEMC$15
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$47k · 9 repeat orgsC$54k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +66% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
12

Total granted

C$47k
C$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+29%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$49k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CHABAD OF TOWN
    3× · 2018–2024 · C$16k · revenue +89%
  • BR
    BETH RIVKAH
    4× · 2020–2024 · C$11k · revenue +23%
  • RC
    RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF CANADA
    6× · 2018–2024 · C$8k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · C$2k
  • VZ
    VMM ZICHROM CHAIM CHARITY
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue +5%
  • CO
    CHABAD OF NEWFOUNDLANDgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$200 · revenue +29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
2
Association Chabad sur le Campus

Promotion of jewish culture and religion engage jewish students learning of culture

—
3
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
4
École Maimonide

École dont la vocation est la promotion de l'éducation religieuse

—
5
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
6
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
7
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
8
Chabad of Midtown

Fosters the study of traditional judaism through programmes directed at adults and children.

—
9
Fondation Sépharade Kollel Avrechim / Sephardic Kollel Avrechim foundation

Organiser et maintenir une synaguogue avec l'object de la pratique et l'avancement de la religion.

—
10
Fondation Yam Hatalmud/Yam Hatalmud foundation

To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.

—
11
Chabad Latino MontrÉAl Community

To advance religion by teaching religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith by setting up jewish courses for men and women of all ages.

—
12
Chabad Côte-des-Neiges

Religious observation of orthodox judaism foster religious educational cultural social and recreational activities for the cultivation and promotion of orthodox judaism

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congrégation Beth Chabad C.S.L. and the most unlike its peers is Fondation De L'ecole Maimonide. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
14/28
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBETH ORA — C$35,456 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetCHABAD OF TOWN — C$16,453 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBETH RIVKAH — C$11,383 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMACHSON TZVI HERSH — C$11,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRABBINICAL COLLEGE OF CANADA — C$7,964 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHABAD OLD MONTREAL — C$3,970 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetCHAI CENTER — C$2,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKOLLEL MENACHEM — C$1,860 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetVMM ZICHROM CHAIM CHARITY — C$1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD OF CENTERPOINTE — C$1,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEZRAT ACHIM — C$1,110 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHABAD NEWFOULAND — C$701 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF KEREN HATZOLOH — C$654 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION DE L'ECOLE MAIMONIDE — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHABAD ST LAZARE — C$300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNAUTÉ SEPHARADE HEKHAL SHALOM — C$202 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHABAD OF NEWFOUNDLAND — C$200 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCHABAD ETUDIANTS JUIFS FRANCOPHONES — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSYNAGOGUE UN ARBRE DE VIE-OR MENACHEM — C$125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD SASKATOON — C$103 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGRÉGATION BETH CHABAD CSL — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROHR CHABAD NDG — C$49 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUT YAVNE — C$36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYALDEI — C$36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE — C$23 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARIZAL — C$20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION BAIS MENACHEM CHABAD — C$3 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Federation CjaJewish Community Foun…Rayjo Charitable TrustOrganisation Chabad W…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Centre Chabad De Vill…Fondation Familiale G…L'Organisation de la …Congregation de L'Aid…Fondation Miryam Berd…Aaron and Susan Liebe…Association Chabad su…
Federation CjaQC20.3× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Federation Cja · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Organisation Chabad Westmount Westmount Chabad Organization · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Centre Chabad De Ville Mont Royal Chabad Centre of The Town of Mount Royal · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation · L'Organisation de la jeunesse Chabad Loubavitch/Chabad Loubavitch Youth Organization · Congregation de L'Aide Fraternelle Ezras Achim · Fondation Miryam Berdugo Cohen · Aaron and Susan Lieberman Foundation · Association Chabad sur le Campus

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under judaism.

Source object 810124495:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Le Centre Chabad Ville St-Laurent’s filings →