Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Quebec, QC · Charitable organization

Association Chabad sur le Campus

Promotion of jewish culture and religion engage jewish students learning of culture

C$37k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$500
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHABAD OF MILE ENDC$9,500
CAMP JARDIN D'ISRAEL (CGI)C$8,000
ACADEMIE BETH RIVKAHC$7,525
RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF CANADAC$6,095
COMMUNAUTÉ CHABAD DU VIEUX-MONTRÉALC$650
QUALITY CHINUCHC$600
CYLOC$500
CHABAD OF LASALLEC$500
CHABAD OF DOWNTOWNC$500
CHABAD OF DESSOEURSC$500
CHABAD COTE DES NEIGEC$500
CHABAD OF DORVALC$500
CHABAD OF SOUTH SHOREC$400
YAVNEHC$180
CENTRE SEPHARDE DE TORA LAVAC$180
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$39k · 12 repeat orgsC$36k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
11

Total granted

C$39k
C$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+20%

Still filing today

100%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$20k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • AB
    ACADEMIE BETH RIVKAH
    4× · 2019–2024 · C$13k · revenue +42%
  • CJ
    CAMP JARDIN D'ISRAEL
    3× · 2020–2024 · C$10k · revenue +23%
  • CV
    CHABAD VILLE ST LAURENT
    2× · 2019–2020 · C$6k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • AB
    ACADEMIE BETH RIVKAH
    one grant, 2020 · C$4k
  • RC
    RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF QUEBEC TOMCHEI TMIMIM BNEI MENACHE
    one grant, 2023 · C$3k · revenue 0%
  • M
    MTC
    one grant, 2019 · C$3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Centre Communautaire Chabad de Saint-Lazare

Services religieux activites de synagogue célébrations religieuse

—
2
Association Chabad sur le Campus

Promotion of jewish culture and religion engage jewish students learning of culture

—
3
Chabad Latino MontrÉAl Community

To advance religion by teaching religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith by setting up jewish courses for men and women of all ages.

—
4
École Maimonide

École dont la vocation est la promotion de l'éducation religieuse

—
5
Yeshiva Merkaz Torah B'montreal-Central Rabbinical Seminary
—
6
Chabad of Midtown

Fosters the study of traditional judaism through programmes directed at adults and children.

—
7
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
8
Communauté Chabad de Mont-Tremblant

To operate a synagague and promote jewish religieus and moral and ethical values and practices

—
9
École juive sepharadic/the sepharadic cheder

Soutien et rapprochement de la jeunesse a la religion juive

—
10
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
11
CommunautÉ Mada Chabad Mada Chabad Community

A fournir et a renforcer les programmes en hebreu culturelles et religieuses et des milieux de la jeunesse juivee et promouvoir la formation du caractère er du civisme.

—
12
Congrégation Kol Yaacov

Études toraniques activités religieuses de prières et rituels religieux culture juive

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Organisation Chabad of Downtown Montreal Organisation Chabad De Centre Ville MontrÉAl and the most unlike its peers is Le Centre D'accomplissement Lanaar. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
11/31
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetACADEMIE BETH RIVKAH — C$13,325 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP JARDIN D'ISRAEL (CGI) — C$9,600 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHABAD OF MILE END — C$9,500 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetCHABAD VILLE ST LAURENT — C$6,136 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetRABBINICAL COLLEGE OF CANADA — C$6,095 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHAYA MUSHKA SEMINARY — C$4,035 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHAI CENTER — C$3,469 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRABBINICAL COLLEGE OF QUEBEC TOMCHEI TMIMIM BNEI MENACHE — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGARDEN OF HANNAH CAMP — C$1,550 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBETH RAMBAM — C$1,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCYLO — C$654 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNAUTÉ CHABAD DU VIEUX-MONTRÉAL — C$650 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetQUALITY CHINUCH — C$600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHABAD OF DORVAL — C$572 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCHABAD OF DOWNTOWN — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHABAD OF DESSOEURS — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD COTE DES NEIGE — C$500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHABAD OF SOUTH SHORE — C$400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUT CBM — C$283 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION BAIS MENACHEM — C$253 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD ZICHRON KEDOSHIM — C$252 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYAVNEH — C$204 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD OF DOWNTOWN VANCOUVER — C$200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRE SEPHARDE DE TORA LAVA — C$180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYAVNEH — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD OF NEWFOUNDLAND — C$155 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLA — C$107 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD OF DOLLARD — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION OF THE FOLLOWERS OF THE RABBI OF LUBAVITCH — C$100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHABAD OF WATERLOO — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE LANAAR — C$90 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Federation CjaRayjo Charitable TrustOrganisation Chabad W…Centre Chabad De Vill…Jewish Community Foun…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…L'Organisation de la …Aaron and Susan Liebe…VMM Zichron Chaim Cha…Congrégation Beth Cha…Chabad Chai Center / …Congregation Bais Men…
Federation CjaQC24× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Federation Cja · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Organisation Chabad Westmount Westmount Chabad Organization · Centre Chabad De Ville Mont Royal Chabad Centre of The Town of Mount Royal · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · L'Organisation de la jeunesse Chabad Loubavitch/Chabad Loubavitch Youth Organization · Aaron and Susan Lieberman Foundation · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity · Congrégation Beth Chabad C.S.L. · Chabad Chai Center / Centre Chabad Chai · Congregation Bais Menachem Chabad-Lubavitch

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 822382792:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Association Chabad sur le Campus’ filings →