Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Outremont, QC · Charitable organization

L'École Beth Tziporah

The charity operates an elementary and high school for jewish girls

C$77k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$32k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k7 grants · C$23k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$54k
C$7,500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BNOT JERUSALEM SEMINARYC$31,525
KOLEL BELZC$12,552
TEFILO LEMOISHE CONGREAGATIONC$10,000
CONGRÉGATION SKVERC$8,500
BETH JACOB DE RAV HIRSCHPRUNG SCHOOLC$7,500
ECOLE PREMIERE MESIFTA DU CANADAC$2,880
ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITYC$2,000
MIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED (MCB)C$1,400
VIZNITZ INSTITUTIONSC$732
TASHBARC$143
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$341k · 12 repeat orgsC$78k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
10

Total granted

C$341k
C$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+19%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$51k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • KT
    KEHAL TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF
    5× · 2017–2022 · C$57k · revenue +271%
  • CT
    CONGREGATION TOLDOT YOSSEF
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$46k · revenue +59%
  • TL
    TEFILA LEMOSHE
    3× · 2018–2024 · C$25k · revenue +172%

Funded once

  • MV
    MENUCHA VESIMCHAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$8k · revenue +34%
  • RC
    RAV CHESED
    one grant, 2020 · C$6k
  • WC
    WIZNITZ COMMUNITY CENTRE
    one grant, 2022 · C$4k · revenue -81%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
3
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
4
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
5
École Maimonide

École dont la vocation est la promotion de l'éducation religieuse

—
6
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
7
Fonds Immobilier Satmar/ Satmar Building Fund

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
8
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
9
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
10
Tav College / Collège Tav

To provide premises purchased classroom equipment and computers hired instructors etc to teach marketable skills and secular training towards employment for students who require a jewish environment during classes.

—
11
Hatzolas Yisroel D'arizal

To advance education by providing scholarships and financial assistance to students at mosdos belz school in israel. to relieve poverty by providing financial assistance and interest-free loans to the poor. and to undertake activities…

—
12
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is CongrÉGation Belz and the most unlike its peers is Maharam Tav Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMIFALEI CHAIM BEHESSED — C$163,680 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetKEHAL TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF — C$56,850 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetCONGREGATION TOLDOT YOSSEF — C$46,267 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBNOT JERUSALEM SEMINARY — C$31,525 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetTEFILA LEMOSHE — C$25,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetKOLEL BELZ — C$13,152 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCONGRÉGATION SKVER — C$8,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMENUCHA VESIMCHA — C$7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBETH JACOB DE RAV HIRSCHPRUNG SCHOOL — C$7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEHILLAS BELZ — C$6,820 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetVIZNITZ INSTITUTIONS — C$5,732 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYAM HATALMUD FOUNDATION — C$5,350 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCONGREGATION IMRAY CHAIM VIZNITZ — C$4,850 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWIZNITZ COMMUNITY CENTRE — C$3,600 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMAHARAM TAV — C$3,165 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONG BELZ — C$3,120 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetECOLE PREMIERE MESIFTA DU CANADA — C$2,880 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKOLEL NOAM ELIEZER — C$2,845 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBELZ COMMUNITY SCHOOL — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLA — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTASHBAR — C$143 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mifalei Chaim Bechese…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…The M.K. Foundation/L…Rosenberg Family Foun…Charité Tzedakah Mont…Maharam Tav FundAaron and Susan Liebe…The George Kohn Chari…The Micha Life Founda…The Friedman Family F…D E Foundation / la F…Fondation de la Famil…
Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB)QC21.4× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Maharam Tav Fund · Aaron and Susan Lieberman Foundation · The George Kohn Charitable Foundation / la Fondation Charitable George Kohn · The Micha Life Foundation la Fondation de Vie Micha · The Friedman Family Foundation/La Fondation Familiale Friedman · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under teaching institutions.

Source object 134669084:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on L'École Beth Tziporah’s filings →