Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Outremont, QC · Charitable organization

Kolel Mareh Yechkel Congregation

To carry on a synagogue and enhance religious awareness

C$9k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$3k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$750
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$524k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KTVC$3,000
MCBC$1,350
MESIFTA KEREN MENACHEMC$1,200
CONG YETEV LEVC$830
CONG BAIS CHABADC$750
Individual grant recipientC$630
CONGREGATION YESHIVA ZERA KODESHC$620
KOLEL SHOMREI HACHOMOSC$232
CHIBAS YERUSHOLAYIMC$165
BIKUR CHOLIMC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$217k · 17 repeat orgsC$50k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
23

Total granted

C$217k
C$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+23%

Still filing today

88%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$795 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • YS
    YESHIVN SHERAT HAPLETOT
    4× · 2017–2022 · C$36k · revenue +538%
  • YL
    YETEV LEV
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$9k · revenue +15%
  • MT
    Maharam Tov Fund
    2× · 2017–2018 · C$5k · revenue +238%

Funded once

  • CI
    CONG IMREI CHAIM
    one grant, 2017 · C$15k
  • ZC
    ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY FUND
    one grant, 2017 · C$9k · revenue -6%
  • YN
    YESHIVA NOVOMINSK
    one grant, 2017 · C$7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
2
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
3
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
4
École Maimonide

École dont la vocation est la promotion de l'éducation religieuse

—
5
CongrÉGation Belz

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.

—
6
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
7
Fondation Yam Hatalmud/Yam Hatalmud foundation

To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.

—
8
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
9
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
10
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
11
Fonds Immobilier Satmar/ Satmar Building Fund

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
12
Congrégation Kehal Toldos Yakov Yosef

1.- to foster and encourage the practice and study of the jewish religion and development of behaviour among the jewish community with the goal of advancing the jewish religion. 2. -to organize causes classes lectures and seminars with the…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Académie Yeshiva Toras Moshe de Montréal and the most unlike its peers is Maharam Tav Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
21/27
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCONG TETEV LREV — C$124,225 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetYESHIVN SHERAT HAPLETOT — C$35,975 over 4y, 8.5% of budgetMCB — C$9,488 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYETEV LEV — C$9,444 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY FUND — C$9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMaharam Tov Fund — C$5,492 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONG YESHIVN ZERA KODESH — C$5,120 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCONG SKVEN — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMESIFTA KEREN MENACHEM — C$3,950 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetKTV — C$3,750 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBETH JACOB TEACHAM COLLEGE — C$3,650 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCONG BETH CHABAD — C$3,450 over 2y, 27% of budgetFIRST MESIRTA CANANN — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONG BELZ — C$2,666 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKOLLEL SHOMRE HACHOMOS — C$2,161 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBETH ESTHER — C$1,886 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONG SKVER — C$1,350 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetToras Moshe — C$950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLA — C$950 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLF — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION DE BEAD AMEINU — C$500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCONG LUBAVITCH — C$388 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMACHZEKEI TORAH — C$360 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetELIZER MESHILEM FEISID — C$325 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION AHAS ISRAEL — C$215 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHIBAS YERUSHOLAYIM — C$165 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM — C$140 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Zichron David and Pes…Charité Tzedakah Mont…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Maharam Tav FundVMM Zichron Chaim Cha…Mifalei Chaim Bechese…Fondation de la Famil…The M.K. Foundation/L…Fondation Ebs/Ebs Fou…Rosenberg Family Foun…D E Foundation / la F…Shmilu and Sari Rosen…
Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger FundQC23.4× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Maharam Tav Fund · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Fondation Ebs/Ebs Foundation · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · Shmilu and Sari Rosenberg Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under judaism.

Source object 886881390:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Kolel Mareh Yechkel Congregation’s filings →