Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Thornhill, ON · Charitable organization

Friends Kiryat Hyaeled Jerusalem

Provide school care facilities for financially deprived pre-school age children and provide assistance for financially deprived seniors (over 55) in the state of israel.

C$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$907k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k5 grants · C$30k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$18k
  • C$50k–250k3 grants · C$255k
  • C$250k+2 grants · C$1.2M
C$18,392
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$26k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANIYEI IRCHOC$906,770
KOLLEL DAF YOMIC$250,000
KEHAL MACHZIKEI HADAS BELZC$100,000
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MISHON LA'CHOLEHC$90,000
BAIS TEFILLOH FRANKLINC$65,000
CONGREGATION BELZC$18,392
BNOT JERUSALEMC$8,550
KAV SHALOMC$7,500
ÉCOLE COMMUNAUTAIRE BELZ/BELZ COMMUNITY SCHOOLC$6,554
MERKAZ HACHINUCHC$6,000
KOLEL OF CONGREGATION CHASIDE BELZC$1,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$11M · 12 repeat orgsC$732k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
12

Total granted

C$11M
C$653k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+39%

Still filing today

75%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$79k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    ANIYEI IRCHO
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$4.5M · revenue +199%
  • KD
    KOLLEL DAF YOMI
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$1.3M · revenue +68%
  • CF
    CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MISHAN LA'CHOLE
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$689k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • ZC
    ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY
    one grant, 2018 · C$280k · revenue +5%
  • GO
    GATES OF MERCY
    one grant, 2019 · C$125k
  • MC
    MIFALEI CHAIM BECHESEDgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$80k · revenue +40%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
2
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
3
Reb Mayer Baal Hanes - Chibas Jerusalem

Providing scholarships to poor and low income students in israel.

—
4
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
5
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—
6
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
7
Or Chadash

Scholarships were granted to qualified students wh desired to continue their education. our agent in isreal rabbi '...' must approve all scholarship applications to ensure that the students qualify for financial assisstance due to faily…

—
8
Hatzolas Yisroel D'arizal

To advance education by providing scholarships and financial assistance to students at mosdos belz school in israel. to relieve poverty by providing financial assistance and interest-free loans to the poor. and to undertake activities…

—
9
Beth Hamedrash L'horaah

Operate a school for teaching religious studies

—
10
Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer

Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…

—
11
Kehilas Tosh

To provide financial assistance to needy people in difficult situations. to provide scholarships to qualified students

—
12
The Yeshivah Scholarship Fund of Israel

Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is CongrÉGation Belz and the most unlike its peers is Gates of Mercy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/26
Grantees still filing
17/26
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetANIYEI IRCHO — C$4,482,700 over 7y, 12% of budgetKUPAS HACHESED MEOROTH — C$2,017,300 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetKOLLEL DAF YOMI — C$1,250,500 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetCHASDEI LEVI YITZCHOK — C$739,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF MISHAN LA'CHOLE — C$688,750 over 6y, 8.0% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$280,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetKEHAL MACHZIKEI HADAS BELZ — C$272,500 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetKEHILAS BELZ — C$162,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetMIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED — C$79,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetKAV SHALOM — C$67,500 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetBAIS TEFILLOH FRANKLIN — C$65,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetCIRCLE OF LIFE — C$28,685 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTZIVOS HASHEM — C$28,100 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetNER ISRAEL — C$28,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCONGREGATION BELZ — C$25,392 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBAIS CHAYA MUSHKA SCHOOL FOR GIRLS — C$25,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetJHF — C$22,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBNOT JERUSALEM — C$10,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetÉCOLE COMMUNAUTAIRE BELZ/BELZ COMMUNITY SCHOOL — C$6,554 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMERKAZ HACHINUCH — C$6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TORONTO CHEDER — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKOLEL OF CONGREGATION CHASIDE BELZ — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION SIMCHAS CHAIM — C$500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHABAD JEWISH CENTRE OF BARRIE — C$100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Centre chabadCharité Tzedakah Mont…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Menucha VesimchaMifalei Chaim Bechese…Maharam Tav FundMoral Arc FoundationCongrégation BelzThe M.K. Foundation/L…Bais Tefilloh Frankl…Kolel of Congregation…Séminaire BNOT Jérusa…
Centre chabadQC16.6× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Centre chabad · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Menucha Vesimcha · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Maharam Tav Fund · Moral Arc Foundation · Congrégation Belz · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Bais Tefilloh Franklin · Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz · Séminaire BNOT Jérusalem / BNOT Jerusalem Seminary

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 856024013:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Friends Kiryat Hyaeled Jerusalem’s filings →