Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Corps de bénévoles Hatzoloh division Outremont

Provide first aid and pre-hospital care to members of the jewish orthodox.provide emergency first aid training to volunteer members.

C$125k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$69k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k9 grants · C$21k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$35k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$69k
C$2,500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$691k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAHARAM TAV FUNDC$68,920
SAUVETAGE DE MONTREAL HATZOLOH/ HATZOLOH RESUCEC$25,000
D&W DIVISION-HATZOLOH SERVICE MÉDICAL D'URGENCE BENEVOLEC$10,000
CONGREGATION BELZC$8,965
VIZNITZ INSTITUTIONC$2,980
CONGREGATION GATE DAVID OF BOBOVC$2,500
FONDATION YAM HATALMUDC$1,700
BONEI OAM FOUNDATION INC./ FONDATION BONEI OLAM INC.C$1,510
CENTRE COMMUNAUTAIRE AHAVAS CHESED INC/AHAVAS CHESEDC$1,360
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF KOLEL EMES V'EMUNAH WIZNITZC$1,000
REFUAH VCHESEDC$540
MENUCHA VESIMCHAC$180
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$257k · 10 repeat orgsC$48k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
8

Total granted

C$257k
C$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+9%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$29k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MAHARAM TAV FUND
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$128k · revenue +18%
  • CB
    CONGREGATION BELZ
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$40k · revenue +8%
  • CT
    CHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTRÉAL
    2× · 2019–2023 · C$26k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • MC
    MIFALEI CHAIM BECHESED
    one grant, 2022 · C$6k
  • TY
    THE YAD EZER FUND
    one grant, 2022 · C$6k · revenue -12%
  • CK
    CONGREGATION KEHAL TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF
    one grant, 2023 · C$2k · revenue -26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer

Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…

—
3
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
4
Ziv Tzedakah Foundation

Solicitation of donations

—
5
The Chabad Rehovot Fund
—
6
Olam Chesed Yobone Fund
—
7
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
8
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
9
Chasdei Levy Yitzcok

To relieve poverty by providing reasonable financial means for food shelter and other supplies or services to needy persons in israel

—
10
La Fondation Humanitaire Breslov

To provide funds for the religious and spiritual activities of the Breslov community.

—
11
CongrÉGation Et Yechiva Zera Kodesh

To operate a school for higher talmudic studies

—
12
Fonds Immobilier Satmar/ Satmar Building Fund

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Congrégation Charidem and the most unlike its peers is Maharam Tav Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAHARAM TAV FUND — C$128,340 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCONGREGATION BELZ — C$40,184 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTRÉAL — C$26,180 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAUVETAGE DE MONTREAL HATZOLOH/ HATZOLOH RESUCE — C$25,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetREFUAH VCHESED — C$19,080 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetD&W DIVISION-HATZOLOH SERVICE MÉDICAL D'URGENCE BENEVOLE — C$12,550 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetVIZNITZ INSTITUTION — C$11,980 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIMRAY CHAIM D'CHASIDAI WIZNITZ — C$8,666 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCONGREGATION GATE DAVID OF BOBOV — C$6,300 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetTHE YAD EZER FUND — C$6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION YAM HATALMUD — C$2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCONGREGATION KEHAL TOLDOS YAKOV YOSEF — C$2,200 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONGREGATION ATERES SHLOIME DE BOBOV — C$1,800 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetBONEI OAM FOUNDATION INC./ FONDATION BONEI OLAM INC. — C$1,510 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRE COMMUNAUTAIRE AHAVAS CHESED INC/AHAVAS CHESED — C$1,360 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMENUCHA VESIMCHA — C$1,035 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF KOLEL EMES V'EMUNAH WIZNITZ — C$1,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetRABBINICAL COLLEGE MESIFTA YOEL MOSHE OF CANADA — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION CHARIDEM — C$200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOHEL TORAH CONGREGATION — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maharam Tav FundCharité Tzedakah Mont…Mifalei Chaim Bechese…Fondation Ebs/Ebs Fou…Fondation de la Famil…Rosenberg Family Foun…The M.K. Foundation/L…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Zichron David and Pes…The Micha Life Founda…Jewish Community Foun…D E Foundation / la F…
Maharam Tav FundQC19.3× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maharam Tav Fund · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Fondation Ebs/Ebs Foundation · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · The M.K. Foundation/La Fondation M.K. · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · The Micha Life Foundation la Fondation de Vie Micha · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under supportive health care.

Source object 851828640:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Corps de bénévoles Hatzoloh division Outremont’s filings →